Share

The Hidden Hazard In The Western Wildfires

Climate Central
Published: October 25, 2013

Across the American West, climate change has made snow melt earlier, spring and summers hotter and fire seasons longer.

One result has been a doubling since 1970 of the number of large wildfires raging each year. And depending on the rate of future warming, the number of big wildfires in western states could increase as much as six-fold over the next 20 years.

Beyond the clear danger to life and property in the burn zone, smoke and ash from large wildfires produces staggering levels of air pollution, threatening the health of thousands of people, often hundreds of miles away from where these wildfires burn.

(MORE: Wildfires & Air Pollution, A Hidden Hazard at Climate Central)

The critical component of a fire’s smoke is so-called “fine particle” air pollution, which is a direct threat to human health even during relatively short exposures.

And the pollution levels produced by these wildfires are extremely high: high enough to potentially increase mortality in susceptible populations, like the elderly and those with heart conditions, and increase emergency room visits for asthma sufferers and others with respiratory conditions.  

This analysis looks at air pollution from some of the largest wildfires in the West over the past 12 years. 

We found that:

Wildfires caused the worst air pollution day of the year in the affected areas, for all of the fires analyzed. And the worst day of the year was bad, often as bad or worse than air pollution levels in Beijing. In 9 of the 11 fires analyzed, particulate pollution from the fire made the air unhealthy to breathe for anyone, not just children and sensitive populations.

Wildfires burning within 50-100 miles of a city routinely caused air quality to be 5 to 15 times worse than normal, and often 2-3 times worse than the worst non-fire day of the year.

This year has seen particularly bad examples. Grants Pass, Ore., experienced hazardous air quality this summer, caused by the Douglas Complex and Big Windy Complex fires burning in Southern Oregon.

For nine days this summer, Grants Pass had air quality so poor that it was unhealthy for anyone to be outside. On five of those days, fine particle pollution was literally off the charts — higher than the local air quality meter could read.

Big metro areas are also susceptible to wildfire pollution. At least twice in the past 12 years, cities like Los Angeles, San Diego, and Riverside, Calif., have seen Beijing-level air pollution caused by wildfires burning in southern California.

Rapidly warming spring temperatures and a shrinking snowpack make for a longer fire season, up to two months longer on average across the West. Hotter summers dry out the forest more rapidly and intensely than in the past, and fire suppression practices have increased the fuel supply, further increasing the risk of large, intense fires.

Exposure to fine particulates in wildfire smoke – particles about 30 times smaller than the width of a human hair – pose a significant health risk for anyone, but particularly children, the elderly, and people with existing respiratory problems.

They can penetrate deep into the lungs, increasing the mortality risk and health and lung problems, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

As we continue to warm the planet, wildfires will increase in intensity and size, causing an increasing number of severely unhealthy air pollution days that in turn increase mortality in the elderly and those with heart conditions, while sending a growing number of children and sensitive people to emergency rooms in respiratory distress.

See the full report, Wildfires & Air Pollution, A Hidden Hazard at Climate Central.

Related Content from Climate Central

MORE: Massive Wildfires in New South Wales, Australia

This picture taken on October 24, 2013 shows a firefighter back burning near Faulconbridge in the Blue Mountains. (SAEED KHAN/AFP/Getty Images)


Featured Blogs

Upgraded HWRF and GFDL Hurricane Models Excelled During Hurricane Arthur

By Dr. Jeff Masters
July 11, 2014

There have been major upgrades this year to the two operational National Weather Service (NWS) regional hurricane prediction systems, the GFDL and HWRF models. Both models did well for track and intensity forecasts for Hurricane Arthur, and the average intensity errors wer comparable to the other two top NWS intensity prediction models (LGEM and DSHIPS.)

Warmest Days of the Year for the U.S.

By Christopher C. Burt
July 9, 2014

NOAA recently produced an interesting map showing when the hottest day of the year is likely to occur in the contiguous U.S. Complimenting this map is one produced by Brian Brettschneider of Borealis Scientific, LLC, which illustrates the date of summer’s midpoint (peak of summer average temperatures) which was reproduced in my blog posted last August. Brian has also produced maps of such for the Fall, Winter and Spring seasons. There is also some other great material from Brian herein.

Live Blog: Tracking Hurricane Arthur as it Approaches North Carolina Coast

By Shaun Tanner
July 3, 2014

This is a live blog set up to provide the latest coverage on Hurricane Arthur as it threatens the North Carolina Coast. Check back often to see what the latest is with Arthur. The most recent updates are at the top.

Tropical Terminology

By Stu Ostro
June 30, 2014

Here is some basic, fundamental terminology related to tropical cyclones. Rather than a comprehensive and/or technical glossary, this represents the essence of the meaning & importance of some key, frequently used terms.

2013-14 - An Interesting Winter From A to Z

By Tom Niziol
May 15, 2014

It was a very interesting winter across a good part of the nation from the Rockies through the Plains to the Northeast. Let's break down the most significant winter storms on a month by month basis.

What the 5th IPCC Assessment Doesn't Include

By Angela Fritz
September 27, 2013

Melting permafrost has the potential to release an additional 1.5 trillion tons of carbon into the atmosphere, and could increase our global average temperature by 1.5°F in addition to our day-to-day human emissions. However, this effect is not included in the IPCC report issued Friday morning, which means the estimates of how Earth's climate will change are likely on the conservative side.