Share

Plan to Bury Nuke Waste in Nevada Draws Fire

By: Ken Ritter
Published: November 15, 2013

SEBASTIEN BOZON/AFP/Getty Images

LAS VEGAS -- Federal plans to truck radioactive material from a World War II-era plant in Tennessee to Nevada for burial in the desert are rekindling a long-running battle to prevent the Silver State from becoming the nation's nuclear dumping ground.

U.S. Department of Energy officials told residents at a town hall meeting Wednesday in Las Vegas that the state doesn't have authority to prevent shipments of uranium waste from Oak Ridge, Tenn., to the Nevada National Security Site north of Las Vegas.

A similar meeting was scheduled late Thursday in rural Pahrump.

(MORE: New Map Shows the Expanse of Deforestation)

Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval, who protested the waste transport and burial plan when it became public last summer, issued a statement Thursday calling it premature to say whether the state will seek a federal court order to block the shipments.

Sandoval aide Mary-Sarah Kinner pointed to continuing talks between state and Energy Department to address concerns about the plan.

Energy Department administrators said they've revised transportation plans, agreed to bury the waste deeper than initially planned, and performed evaluations "above and beyond regulatory requirements" to address state concerns, including the safety of the waste for 10,000 years.

A truck was loaded at Oak Ridge in June, and officials told residents in Las Vegas they want to begin shipments under armed guard in January, before the trip certification expires. Up to 100 shipments would follow before 2017. Shipping times and routes would be kept secret.

The delay is costing $2.5 million a month, department spokeswoman Aoife McCarthy said.

Tracy Mustin, a deputy to Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz, declared Wednesday that moving the potentially deadly material some 2,000 miles was "necessary and in the interest of national security."

"We're confident that we can execute the program safely and securely," Mustin said.

The assurances brought criticism from several of the 80 or so people who attended Wednesday's town hall meeting, including veterans of the decades-long battle that has so far blocked a plan to entomb waste from nuclear plants in tunnels at Yucca Mountain, about 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas.

(MORE: This Water Bottle Has a Secret)

Yucca Mountain is at the western edge of the former Nevada Test Site weapons proving ground, more than 30 miles from the proposed burial spot at the southeast corner of the renamed Nevada National Security Site.

Judy Treichel, executive director of the Nevada Nuclear Waste Task Force and a longtime Yucca Mountain project opponent, noted that the waste began as nuclear fuel in the 1960s at the Indian Point nuclear reactor on New York's Hudson River.

She said she suspected the Energy Department improperly downgraded the material to low-level nuclear waste to make disposal easier.

A project administrator, Frank Marcinowski, responded that the material had been processed to make it more stable.

It doesn't qualify as high-level waste, Marcinowski said, and there was no reason to continue to store it in Tennessee because it had been deemed unusable for industrial, research or weapon production.

(WATCH: How You Can Help the Victims of Typhoon Haiyan)

The waste is contained in 403 solid metal canisters the size of a fat baseball bat or oversized umbrella. The containers would be buried in trenches below a 40-foot level at which a layer of shipping containers filled with radioactively contaminated materials ranging from worker uniforms to machine parts would be stacked. An 8-foot layer of dirt would top the site.

Marcinowski called the burial site ideal due to its remoteness, 24-hour National Security Site guard, scarce rainfall and groundwater level at 750 feet below the surface.

Senate Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid, a leader of the years-long fight to block and defund the Yucca Mountain project, said in a statement Thursday that he wasn't convinced the Oak Ridge waste should be sent to Nevada.

"I'm pleased that DOE and the governor's office continue discussions on this proposal," he said.

MORE: An Abandoned Soviet Nuclear Arsenal

Inside an abandoned Soviet nuclear arsenal located underground in the town of Krasnokamianka in Crimea, Ukraine. (Sam Namos/SamNamos.com)


Featured Blogs

I am a Failed Father

By Shaun Tanner
April 17, 2014

Being a father is very hard! I know, I sound like a whiner, but I felt especially bad this week when I caused my daughter to miss the lunar eclipse.

California Drought/Polar Vortex Jet Stream Pattern Linked to Global Warming

By Dr. Jeff Masters
April 16, 2014

From November 2013 - January 2014, a remarkably extreme jet stream pattern set up over North America, bringing the infamous "Polar Vortex" of cold air to the Midwest and Eastern U.S., and a "Ridiculously Resilient Ridge" of high pressure over California, which brought the worst winter drought conditions ever recorded to that state. A new study by Utah State scientist S.-Y. Simon Wang found that this jet stream pattern was the most extreme on record, and likely could not have grown so extreme without the influence of human-caused global warming.

March 2014 Global Weather Extremes Summary

By Christopher C. Burt
April 15, 2014

March featured a number of anomalous extreme weather events such as the floods in portions of Egypt and New Zealand, a freak hailstorm in Asmara, Eritrea, record warmth in much of Europe, severe cold and snow in the eastern half of the U.S. and heavy rainfall in the Pacific Northwest that culminated in a deadly landslide in Washington. Preliminary data from NASA indicates that globally (land-ocean temperature index), it was the 4th warmest March on record (since 1880).

Polar Vortex, Global Warming, and Cold Weather

By Stu Ostro
January 10, 2014

Some thoughts about the recent viral meme(s).

What the 5th IPCC Assessment Doesn't Include

By Angela Fritz
September 27, 2013

Melting permafrost has the potential to release an additional 1.5 trillion tons of carbon into the atmosphere, and could increase our global average temperature by 1.5°F in addition to our day-to-day human emissions. However, this effect is not included in the IPCC report issued Friday morning, which means the estimates of how Earth's climate will change are likely on the conservative side.

Astronomical VS. Meteorological Winter

By Tom Niziol
March 1, 2013