Macro or Micro: Can You Tell These Images Apart?

By: By Laura Dattaro and Edecio Martinez
Published: November 8, 2013

One day last year, a picture showed up on Paul Kelly’s door. Kelly, a biologist at Salem State University, thought it was an image of calcified bone material taken by his officemate using a scanning electron microscope, a device that creates images at the atomic scale.

It turned out to be a photo not of something very small, but of something very big — sand dunes in the Sahara, taken by satellites. It belonged to Stephen Young, a geographer who worked a few floors away and who had noticed that Kelly’s microscopic images sometimes exhibited the same patterns as his own macroscopic ones.

“We’re both interested in spatial patterns,” Young told “I’m just interested in them at the macro scale and Paul’s interested in them at the micro scale.”

Kelly, for example, sometimes works with other geologists in the building, looking at thin slices of minerals under the electron microscope. When minerals shatter, they follow specific breaking patterns that stay consistent even when scaled up.

“It’s the same at the microscope and macroscopic levels,” Kelly told “The way minerals shatter and the way rocks shatter is going to be the same no matter what the scale.”

The scope of Young’s images ranges from about one mile to about 3,000 miles; Kelly’s are generally a millimeter to a micrometer. At the closest, Young said, the sizes in their images are different by a magnitude of a million.

Still, it can be hard to tell the pictures apart. Kelly and Young decided to gather a collection of their work and display them in a “Macro or Micro?” exhibition at Salem State’s Winfisky Gallery and the Traina Center for the Arts at Clark University. Visitors often guessed wrong, including trained scientists.

The exhibit also stirred interest in some of the university’s art students, who are going to use Kelly’s microscope to make artwork.

Can you tell which is which? Click through the slideshow above to guess whether each image is “macro” or “micro.”

(MORE: Nikon Small World Contest Winners Show Beauty of the Microscopic)

Featured Blogs

More Water For California: New Enormous Water Works Programs Are Expensive

By Dr. Jeff Masters
April 18, 2014

From November 2013 - January 2014, a remarkably extreme jet stream pattern set up over North America, bringing the infamous "Polar Vortex" of cold air to the Midwest and Eastern U.S., and a "Ridiculously Resilient Ridge" of high pressure over California, which brought the worst winter drought conditions ever recorded to that state. A new study by Utah State scientist S.-Y. Simon Wang found that this jet stream pattern was the most extreme on record, and likely could not have grown so extreme without the influence of human-caused global warming.

A Warm Winter in Alaska

By Christopher C. Burt
April 18, 2014

In contrast to much of the contiguous U.S., the National Weather Service (NWS) in Alaska noted in a post this week that Alaska has enjoyed its third warmest ‘winter’ on record for 2013-2014. The period of time they are calling ‘winter’ is for the six months of October 2013 through 2014. Here are a few details.

I am a Failed Father

By Shaun Tanner
April 17, 2014

Being a father is very hard! I know, I sound like a whiner, but I felt especially bad this week when I caused my daughter to miss the lunar eclipse.

Polar Vortex, Global Warming, and Cold Weather

By Stu Ostro
January 10, 2014

Some thoughts about the recent viral meme(s).

What the 5th IPCC Assessment Doesn't Include

By Angela Fritz
September 27, 2013

Melting permafrost has the potential to release an additional 1.5 trillion tons of carbon into the atmosphere, and could increase our global average temperature by 1.5°F in addition to our day-to-day human emissions. However, this effect is not included in the IPCC report issued Friday morning, which means the estimates of how Earth's climate will change are likely on the conservative side.

Astronomical VS. Meteorological Winter

By Tom Niziol
March 1, 2013