Share

Japan Draws Fire for Drastically Scaling Back Climate Reduction Target

Monika Scislowska
Published: November 15, 2013

In this Monday, Oct. 21, 2013 photo, smoke billows from an oil refinery in Kawasaki, southwest of Tokyo. Japan has drastically scaled back its target for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, complicating efforts to forge a global climate change pact. (AP Photo/Koji Sasahara)

TOKYO —Activists taking part in U.N. climate talks say Japan's decision to drastically scale back its target for reducing greenhouse gas emissions will hurt the battle against global warming.

The new target approved by the Japanese Cabinet on Friday calls for reducing emissions by 3.8 percent from their 2005 level by 2020.

The revision was necessary because the earlier goal of a 25 percent reduction from the 1990 level was unrealistic, the chief government spokesman, Yoshihide Suga, told reporters in Tokyo.

The move could complicate the international talks in Poland, which are supposed to lay the ground for a new emissions deal.

Wael Hmaidan, director of Climate Action Network, called Japan's move "outrageous," saying in Warsaw that it will have a "serious and negative impact on the negotiations."

Oxfam spokeswoman Kelly Dent said Japan's "dramatic U-turn" is a "slap in the face for poor countries" struggling with climate change.

(MORE: Feds Plan to Bury Nuke Waste in Nevada)

Under the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, Japan pledged to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 6 percent to 1.186 billion tons a year on average over the five years to March 2013. It has since opted out of the agreement, though came close to meeting that goal before the 2011 accident at the Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear power plant prompted shut-downs of all nuclear plants for safety checks.

The resulting shift back toward reliance on coal, oil and gas for power, and use of diesel generators, has hindered further progress.

Emissions in the fiscal year that ended in March were up 2.8 percent from the year before, and at 1.207 billion tons, the second highest after a record 1.218 billion tons in fiscal 2007.

The new goal announced Friday doesn't take into account possible emissions reductions if Japan restarts some of its nuclear plants, as the government is hoping to do. So it will be revised before the next climate pact is due to be set two years from now, said Masami Tamura, director of the Foreign Ministry's Climate Change Division.

"This target will be reviewed in the future and we hope we will come up with a new and good one," he said.

Environment Minister Nobuteru Ishihara plans to explain Japan's stance and seek understanding from other participants at the talks next week. Tokyo also is planning to provide $16 billion in aid for emissions reductions in developing countries and to commit $110 billion to research on energy and the environment.

Japan is among many Asian nations experiencing extreme weather that could be linked to climate change, a concern conveyed in an emotional appeal to "stop this madness" by Yeb Sano, envoy to the 190-nation Warsaw talks from the Philippines, where thousands are dead and missing from super-typhoon Haiyan.

(MORE: Planet Warming Faster Than Previously Thought)

In Warsaw, the initial reaction to Japan's announcement was consternation even though there is wide understanding of Japan's energy challenges after the 2011 tsunami.

"I don't have any words to describe my dismay," China's official Xinhua News Agency cited Su Wei, deputy chief of the Chinese delegation to the climate talks, as telling reporters in Warsaw.

In Japan, the powerful Federation of Economic Organizations, or Keidanren, has issued a counterproposal for cutting emissions.

Ishihara, the environment minister, has to have something to show other leaders in Warsaw, said Koh Nakajima, a Keidanren official involved in the talks. But without knowing if nuclear plants will resume operations, "It's not very sensible of Japan to say something just for the sake of saying something," he said.

Over the long term, both the government and Keidanren say they aim to halve Japan's greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 through use of best available technologies and holding industries accountable for meeting their own targets.

Compared with 1990, Japan has reduced emissions per unit of economic output by 13 percent, according to Keidanren's calculations.

(MORE: New Map Details Global Deforestation)

Japanese businesses are acutely aware of energy conservation, given the high costs for power, especially after the Fukushima accident.

In a recent interview, the president of electronic components maker Murata Manufacturing, spoke of taking light bulbs out of ceiling sockets to conserve costs.

"We set air conditioners to 28 (degrees Celsius, 82 F) and many other 'peanut' savings, we make everywhere," said Tsuneo Murata. "We've been doing many things for the sake of energy conservation."

Before the Fukushima disaster, Japan's carbon emissions were on a par with European industrial nations such as France, Germany and Britain.

They will hit 1.227 billion tons this year, the government-affiliated Institute of Energy Economics Japan estimates, up nearly 16 percent from 1990.

MORE: Warming Made 2012 A Record-Breaking Year

Warmest Year on Record - New Hampshire

Warmest Year on Record - New Hampshire

Like much of New England, 2012's most unusual heat occurred in the spring, including a 90-degree reading in Concord on April 16 that came earlier on the calendar than any other 90-degree reading in the city's history. (Photo: Tom Brakefield/Thinkstock)

  • Warmest Year on Record - New Hampshire
  • Warmest Year on Record - Vermont
  • Warmest Year on Record - Massachusetts
  • Warmest Year on Record - Rhode Island
  • Warmest Year on Record - Connecticut
  • Warmest Year on Record - New York
  • Warmest Year on Record - New Jersey
  • Warmest Year on Record - Delaware
  • Warmest Year on Record - Ohio
  • Warmest Year on Record - Illinois
  • Warmest Year on Record - Missouri
  • Warmest Year on Record - Kansas
  • Warmest Year on Record - Oklahoma
  • Warmest Year on Record - Texas
  • Warmest Year on Record - New Mexico
  • Warmest Year on Record - Utah
  • Warmest Year on Record - Wyoming
  • Warmest Year on Record - Nebraska
  • Warmest Year on Record - South Dakota

Featured Blogs

Heavy Rainfall Trends

By Christopher C. Burt
August 22, 2014

Yet another phenomenally intense rainfall event has occurred in the U.S. this morning (August 22nd) when 3.95” of rain in one hour was measured by a COOP observer at a site 3 miles southwest of Chicago’s Midway Airport. The return period for such at Midway Airport (according to NOAA’s ‘Precipitation Frequency Data Server’) is once in 500 years. This is similar to the Baltimore, Detroit, and Islip, New York events last week (although the Islip event was probably more in the range of once in a 1000 years). Brian Brettschneider of Borealis Scientific LLC has kindly offered this guest blog today featuring research he has done on heavy rainfall trends for 207 sites across the U.S. for a homogenous POR of 1949-2013.

Atlantic Disturbance 96L (Interim Update)

By Dr. Jeff Masters
August 22, 2014

Live Blog: Tracking Hurricane Arthur as it Approaches North Carolina Coast

By Shaun Tanner
July 3, 2014

This is a live blog set up to provide the latest coverage on Hurricane Arthur as it threatens the North Carolina Coast. Check back often to see what the latest is with Arthur. The most recent updates are at the top.

Tropical Terminology

By Stu Ostro
June 30, 2014

Here is some basic, fundamental terminology related to tropical cyclones. Rather than a comprehensive and/or technical glossary, this represents the essence of the meaning & importance of some key, frequently used terms.

2013-14 - An Interesting Winter From A to Z

By Tom Niziol
May 15, 2014

It was a very interesting winter across a good part of the nation from the Rockies through the Plains to the Northeast. Let's break down the most significant winter storms on a month by month basis.

What the 5th IPCC Assessment Doesn't Include

By Angela Fritz
September 27, 2013

Melting permafrost has the potential to release an additional 1.5 trillion tons of carbon into the atmosphere, and could increase our global average temperature by 1.5°F in addition to our day-to-day human emissions. However, this effect is not included in the IPCC report issued Friday morning, which means the estimates of how Earth's climate will change are likely on the conservative side.