Ozone pollution improving in the U.S.

By: Dr. Jeff Masters , 7:03 PM GMT on May 01, 2007

Air pollution season is here, and the good news is that ozone pollution in 2006 was considerably better than in previous years. Along with pollution due to small particles (particulate matter), ground-level ozone is the most serious pollutant in the U.S. Ozone levels in 2006 showed improvement in 23 out of 35 of the major cities in the U.S. (Figure 1) compared to 2005, and was at or below the 10-year average in all but five cities. Atlanta, Georgia, showed the greatest jump in the number of unhealthy days, from 17 in 2005 to 30 days in 2006; however, this number was still below the 10-year average. Many western cities reached levels at or above the 10-year average, including San Diego, Sacramento, Denver, and Las Vegas. This was in part due to much above average summertime temperatures in the western U.S. (Figure 2). Los Angeles had the worst ozone pollution in the U.S., with 46 unhealthy days. Los Angeles also was the most polluted city overall in 2006, according to the American Lung Association. However, Los Angeles' bad ozone days declined by 16% in 2006 compared to 2005.

Figure 1. The number of days in May through September of 2005 and 2006 in which ground-level ozone reached Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups--an Air Quality Index (AQI) above 100. Corresponding 10-year averages are also shown. Image credit: EPA.

Ozone pollution has improved
Is the improvement seen in ozone levels in 2006 merely due to a lack of meteorological conditions that favor air pollution? To check, I've plotted the difference in surface temperature (degrees C) from May-September 2006, compared to the 10-year average from 1995-2005 (Figure 2). The chemical reactions that form ozone are most efficient at high temperatures, so if the summer of 2006 was cooler than usual, we'd expect a drop in ozone levels. However, the summer of 2006 was the second warmest in U.S. history--but ozone levels still dropped. All of the cities where ozone increased significantly in 2006 over 2005 levels were areas where temperatures were above average. Los Angeles had summer temperatures more than 1 degree C above normal, yet still recorded a drop in ozone, suggesting that strategies to control ozone pollution there are paying dividends. In fact, new rules to limit nitrogen oxide emissions from power plants have been enacted nation-wide in the past few years, and the ozone pollution statistics from 2006 are evidence that these emissions rules are working. Ozone pollution since 1980 has dropped 21% (Figure 3), despite the fact that the average summer temperatures have generally been increasing.

Figure 2. The difference in surface temperature (degrees C) from May-September 2006, compared to the 10-year average from 1995-2005. Temperatures were above the 10-year average across most of the country, except for New Mexico, and portions of the Ohio Valley surrounding Kentucky. Image credit: NCAR/NCEP.

Figure 3. Trends in ozone air pollution in the U.S. (white line) and uncertainty (blue areas, marking the standard deviation). The federal standard of 0.08 ppm is indicated by the dashed line. Since 1980, maximum ozone levels have declined 21%. Since 1990, the decline has been 9%. Note that the lowest ozone levels were recorded in 2004, which was an exceptionally cool summer across most of the U.S. Image credit: U.S. EPA.

Next blog (Thursday): Pollution costs and deaths exceed the impact of a new Hurricane Katrina hitting the U.S. each year.

Jeff Masters

Reader Comments

Comments will take a few seconds to appear.

Post Your Comments

Please sign in to post comments.

Log In or Join

Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.

Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted

Viewing: 638 - 588

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13Blog Index

12:11 AM GMT on May 04, 2007
not sure of the limitations on nhc but expect a differt approch remeber new cap at the helm so its a whole different ballgame and the first year for new cap is only just beginning
Member Since: July 15, 2006 Posts: 197 Comments: 64931
636. Bamatracker
7:35 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
interetsting draekon
Member Since: May 17, 2006 Posts: 6 Comments: 1367
635. StoryOfTheCane
7:34 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
i think im no longer going to be completely trusting NHC forecasts, aren't they being limited to what they can tell the public now? Im sure that would entail not being able to let the public know of an active season ahead, they're probably going to now be more conservative than ever before. Does anybody know exactly what they are limited from informing?
634. Drakoen
7:33 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
hello everyone i just saw this.


Member Since: October 28, 2006 Posts: 57 Comments: 32857
632. thisisfurious
7:24 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Chiklit - about the underpass thing: generally overpasses are one of the most dangerous places to "take cover" in a tornado. However, there is a naughty little misnomer that its safe! So suddenly you have people caught on the roads during a tornado and they are all flocking to the most dangerous place (rather than a ditch, where they would be safer). I know for me, before I learned that it was unsafe - I spent many years thinking it was what people were supposed to do (what did I know about Tornadoes - I was from Utah!). I saw tornado videos that people made and it always showed them under the overpasses. I just thought that's what you did. Apparently there were other not so lucky people in my thought camp.
631. airman45
7:24 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Could be. Thats an interesting theory. However I have never heard of a tornado in Portugal, although there was one in Spain a few years ago. Come on now NRAamy, Im being good tonight and not rubbing anything in.......yet.
Member Since: April 2, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 3518
630. NRAamy
7:10 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Gee, Airman...are you sure it isn't because they didn't live in Portugal?

Member Since: January 24, 2007 Posts: 320 Comments: 31971
629. airman45
7:07 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Interesting that so many people were injured under overpasses. Any idea why?

One reason I saw on a show about tornadoes a few years ago is the wind is being funneled through a small space and can actually increase the velocity by 30% in that small space.
Member Since: April 2, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 3518
627. StormJunkie
6:38 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Afternoon all!

Interesting point 882. Granted that is around the 144hr time frame. THat being said, what I find interesting is the difference in the way the high plays out over the next week according to the Ukmet. Every other model has been putting a big break in the high and pushing the Western portion to the south....The Ukmet keeps it bridged and does not push it as far south. This seems unlikely since it is the outlier as of now.
Member Since: August 17, 2005 Posts: 26 Comments: 18190
626. TheCaneWhisperer
6:28 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Severe Weather starting to fire in Central and Southeast Florida. Very ripe outside right now!

Humidity: 60%
Dew Point: 72 F / 22 C
Wind: Calm
Wind Gust: 0.0 mph / 0.0 km/h
Pressure: 30.00 in / 1015.8 hPa (Falling)
Heat Index: 93 F / 34 C
Visibility: 10.0 miles / 16.1 kilometers
UV: 12 out of 16
Clouds: Scattered Clouds 2200 ft / 670 m

(Above Ground Level)
625. 882MB
6:11 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Hey everybody, What has happened with the UKMET 12Z it look really weird! But the other models also showing a LOW PRESSURE IN THAT AREA MEANDERING!
Member Since: September 29, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 1009
624. weatherboykris
5:48 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Posted By: Chicklit at 5:16 PM GMT on May 03, 2007.

Nice post about 'Today in Weather History' Taz...Interesting that so many people were injured under overpasses. Any idea why?
Here in east Central Florida today it's smoky, breezy and dry.

The poeple get sucked out of the overpasses.

Member Since: December 9, 2006 Posts: 125 Comments: 11346
623. weatherboykris
5:47 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
TSR has released their May forecast update.They dropped their TS numbers slightly with 16/9/4,compared to 17/9/4 last month.
Member Since: December 9, 2006 Posts: 125 Comments: 11346
622. Tazmanian
5:24 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Chicklit well most people sould no not to hid under a overpasses
621. hurricane23
5:17 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Posted By: Crisis57 at 13:09 EDT le 03 mai 2007.

I here you i think i worded that wrong H23 i didn't mean a repeat of storms i meant a repeat of the placement of the B-high.

We'll the high is hard to predict to weeks out but overall as the weeks progress we will begin to get a better idea how the steering pattern might be shaping up.
Member Since: May 14, 2006 Posts: 8 Comments: 13873
620. Chicklit
5:16 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Nice post about 'Today in Weather History' Taz...Interesting that so many people were injured under overpasses. Any idea why?
Here in east Central Florida today it's smoky, breezy and dry.
Member Since: July 11, 2006 Posts: 14 Comments: 12033
619. Crisis57
5:09 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
I here you i think i worded that wrong H23 i didn't mean a repeat of storms i meant a repeat of the placement of the B-high
618. hurricane23
5:04 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Posted By: Crisis57 at 12:33 EDT le 03 mai 2007.

Thanks alot H23 his points of views and the article itself is very interesting if that high stays in place like he says wouldn't that be a repeat of what we saw in 2005?

A repeat of 2005 is extremely unlikely as those type of seasons will only occur about once every fifty years.

One thing thats very important is not to put to much focus on numbers that are predicted as it only takes one to ruin lives.IF we have 25 systems form out in the middle of the atlantic it wont matter cause its the ones that actually make landfall that have the greatest impact.Use this time wisely and take advantage of tax free week on hurricane supplies coming a few weeks and have that hurricane plan in place.Adrian

Adrian's Weather
Member Since: May 14, 2006 Posts: 8 Comments: 13873
617. Tazmanian
4:46 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
dos any one no what day it is today????

The May 3, 1999, Oklahoma Tornado Outbreak was the first stage of a severe weather event that lasted from May 3 to May 6 and brought violent storms to Oklahoma, Kansas, Arkansas, and Tennessee. This article concentrates on the events in Oklahoma. On May 3, 66 tornadoes broke out in Oklahoma and Kansas. The most significant tornado first touched down southwest of Chickasha, Oklahoma, and became an F5 before dissipating over Midwest City, Oklahoma. The tornado tore through Bridge Creek, Oklahoma, leveling the town. Forty-eight people perished during the outbreak. This tornadic event ranks in severity with the Palm Sunday tornado outbreak of 1965. With a total of 66 tornadoes, it was the most prolific tornado outbreak in Oklahoma history, although not the deadliest.

Contents [hide]
1 Outbreak description
2 The Moore F5
2.1 Path
2.2 Casualties
2.3 Impact
2.3.1 The risk of using overpasses as storm shelters
2.3.2 Fujita scale
3 Other significant tornadoes
4 Damage estimates
5 See also
6 External links and references

[edit] Outbreak description
The day started sunny, warm, and humid. The Storm Prediction Center in Norman, Oklahoma initially issued a "slight risk" for severe weather for most of the state of Oklahoma early that morning. By late morning the latest observations and forecasts began to indicate an increasing likelihood of widespread severe weather, and the SPC upgraded sections of the southern plains to "moderate risk." By 3 pm, it had become evident that a widespread severe weather event was imminent. Parts of Oklahoma and Kansas were then further upgraded to "high risk." When a "high risk" is issued, this usually indicates a significant threat for severe thunderstorms and tornadoes including damaging tornadoes. The SPC issued a tornado watch by mid-afternoon as conditions gathered together for what would be a historic tornado outbreak. The CAPE values reached nearly 6,000 J/kg during the day.

The beautiful May morning gave way to raging dark skies in the afternoon. Large supercell thunderstorms developed and in the late afternoon through the mid-evening hours of that Monday, tornadoes began to break out across the state.

Total Confirmed
F0 Confirmed
F1 Confirmed
F2 Confirmed
F3 Confirmed
F4 Confirmed
66 33 12 10 7 3 1

(based on NOAA Storm Data)

[edit] The Moore F5

[edit] Path

A home torn apart by the Moore, Oklahoma F5 tornadoThe most significant touched down just southwest of the community of Amber, Oklahoma, and headed northeast, parallel to Interstate 44, just after another tornado had passed over the airport in Chickasha, OK. (Note: it may be argued that the storms touching down in Chickasha and Amber were the same storm; however, for weather tracking purposes, each touchdown is counted as a separate tornado which is most probable.) The storm continued moving northeast, destroying the community of Bridge Creek and crossing I-44 just north of Newcastle.

The tornado then crossed the Canadian River, passing into far southern Oklahoma City. As it passed over Bridge Creek, Oklahoma, around 6:54 pm, a Doppler On Wheels (DOW: Wurman et al. 1997, Wurman 2001) mobile Doppler radar detected winds of 301 +/- 20 mph [1] inside the tornado at a height of 32 m AGL (Wurman et al. 2007). (The old record was a 257-268 mph wind measurement from a Doppler radar near Red Rock, Oklahoma, as reported in a formal publication by Bluesetein et al. (1993)). These winds, however, occurred above the ground, and winds at the surface may not have been quite this intense. The tornado continued on into Moore and then passed over the intersection of Shields Boulevard and Interstate 35 and back into Oklahoma City, crossing Interstate 240 near Bryant Avenue. The storm then turned more northerly, striking parts of Del City and Tinker Air Force Base near Sooner Road as an F4 before diminishing over Midwest City and finally lifting near the intersection of Reno Avenue and Woodcrest Drive.

[edit] Casualties

The frame of a pickup truck wrapped around a utility pole from the Moore, Oklahoma F5 tornado36 people were killed in this tornado. More than 10,500 buildings and 47 businesses were destroyed. This tornado caused $1.1 billion in damage, making it the fourth costliest single tornado in U.S. history. This was the deadliest tornado since the April 10, 1979 Wichita Falls, Texas Tornado which killed 42 people. However, early warning saved many lives. Warnings were issued well in advance of the tornado's arrival, and the Oklahoma City broadcast media interrupted programming to follow the storms on radar and even by helicopter. The death toll would have been much higher if people had not been warned so far in advance. Following the storm, three of the local television stations in Oklahoma City: KOCO-TV, KWTV and KFOR-TV continued coverage of the damaging and deadly tornadoes throughout the day on May 4.

[edit] Impact
Outbreak death toll State Total County County
Kansas 6 Sedgwick 6
Oklahoma 40 Cleveland 11
Grady 12
Kingfisher 1
Logan 1
McClain 1
Payne 1
Pottawatomie 1
Oklahoma 12
Tennessee 3 Perry 3
Texas 1 Titus 1
Totals 50
All deaths were tornado-related

[edit] The risk of using overpasses as storm shelters
Three of the deaths reported in the tornado were from people who took shelter underneath overpasses in the area of the path of the Moore-Bridge Creek F5 tornado. The deaths occurred at the 16th Street overpass over Interstate 44 in Newcastle (just east of Bridge Creek), at the Shields Boulevard overpass over Interstate 35 in Moore, and the overpass at mile marker 176.5 on Interstate 35 in rural northwestern Payne County (west of Stillwater).

The two overpass deaths associated with the Oklahoma City storm occurred when the tornado was at its most violent (i.e. F4 or F5) intensity. However, it is of note that the tornado that caused the fatality at Interstate 35 mile marker 176.5 in Payne County was of F2 intensity when it struck the overpass and was NOT in an urban area. This suggests, contrary to the Kansas Turnpike video (see the El Dorado Lake Tornado), that a tornado need not be a large, violent tornado with a considerable debris cloud to cause fatal injuries to people seeking shelter from storms under overpasses. In addition to the fatal injuries to three people, there were also many severe, potentially life-threatening and gruesome injuries inflicted upon people underneath the overpasses that in some cases has left these people with permanent disabilities.

[edit] Fujita scale
This tornado's remarkable wind speed, at the high extreme of the Fujita Scale's F5, led to much speculation that the scale would be modified to include an F6 category, due to the winds possibly exceeding 320 mph. This speculation ignored the fact that the Fujita scale measures damage rather than windspeed, since the scale was developed prior to the introduction of Doppler radar. Windspeed estimates associated with the different categories represent the speeds scientists believe are required to produce that damage rather than the windspeed in that particular storm. The damage caused by an F5-designated tornado leaves very little room for a higher category

thats right today is may 3dr 2007 wish is 5 year a go we had this
616. ricderr
4:38 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
pat's down.....pat's down
Member Since: June 27, 2006 Posts: 688 Comments: 24002
615. BoyntonBeach
4:37 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
I guess I'm the lucky one. We had great downpour last night..
Member Since: July 5, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 1
614. lilmax
4:33 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
I remember an old blog by one of the members saying the first storm would be May 15th. I've been marking my calendar. And we all have noticed the GFS forecasting that system 284 hours from now. Lands right around May 15th.
613. Crisis57
4:33 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Thanks alot H23 his points of views and the article itself is very interesting if that high stays in place like he says wouldn't that be a repeat of what we saw in 2005?
612. hurricane23
4:25 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Whats up Skye....

No rain just bright blue skys out there.Iam cool with that for now but we definately need the rain.
Member Since: May 14, 2006 Posts: 8 Comments: 13873
611. hurricane23
4:23 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
crisis57 just sent that out to you.
Member Since: May 14, 2006 Posts: 8 Comments: 13873
610. Skyepony (Mod)
4:22 PM GMT on May 03, 2007

Chance of Wetting Rain (CWR)

Is the likelihood, expressed as a percent, of a wetting rainfall (1/100th of an inch) at a grid point during the indicated valid period.

The low isn't really expected to develop, gfs & other models play it up more then what is expected with all that shear. It's not suppose to bring us the rain 23~ but if it fails to errode the ridge then you can kiss your 30% chance on sunday goodbye, cause there won't be a backdoor front...
Member Since: August 10, 2005 Posts: 418 Comments: 43834
609. Crisis57
4:16 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Very interesting post you put up H23 do you mind emailing it to me so i can read the rest of it. I just hope that everyone in the gulf and Florida is ready for this season and didn't let there guard down after 2006.
608. hurricane23
4:14 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Dont think there much chance of any kind of development there you can see the clouds being blown of to the NE.As far as the rain chances for south florida they look very low about 30 percent at best threw the weekend.The only bright side is temps are set to cool of a bit this weekend but should ramp back up into the mid to upper 80's by early next week with dry conditions persisting.Adrian

Adrian's Weather
Member Since: May 14, 2006 Posts: 8 Comments: 13873
607. moonlightcowboy
4:12 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
23, I'd like to read all of it, too. Sounds very interesting. Is it too long to post?
Member Since: July 9, 2006 Posts: 184 Comments: 29682
606. hurricane23
4:09 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
No problem Sheri anytime....

SJ sent you the complete article threw email.

Its quite interesting as he seems to think the ridge will hold strong and force systems on a westward path towards the states.
Member Since: May 14, 2006 Posts: 8 Comments: 13873
605. newt3d
4:08 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
I have a slightly unrelated question for yall, hopefully someone with some forecasting experience can shed some light on this for me.

When my local weather man forecasts that there is a 30% chance of rain, what does he mean?

1. There is a 30% chance that it will rain in the next 24 hours at a particular location?
2. 30% of the channel's viewing area will receive rain in the next 24 hours?
3. A certain location will receive rain for 30% of the day?
4. 30% of the people watching the news will see rain 30% of the time?

Do these numbers have any actual defined meaning, or are they just a heuristic measure?
Member Since: October 6, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 94
604. Skyepony (Mod)
4:06 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
I figured ya'lled be hyping the potental blob in here..

gfs. The NWS has been talking about the surface low forming for 24hrs now. Should move off to the NE but hoping it will erode the ridge before it leaves, giving FL a chance at a backdoor front come sunday...
Member Since: August 10, 2005 Posts: 418 Comments: 43834
603. catastropheadjuster
4:03 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
StormjJunkie & H23- Thanks for stopping by. SJ I agree if everyone would get on board especially all the good folks here In the WUBA Family and passed the word on it might help, I mean well never know unless EVERYONE does it. Cause I know there's alot of people here, Just the word of mouth does wonders. Me and u both know this.
Member Since: August 24, 2006 Posts: 21 Comments: 3689
602. StormJunkie
3:59 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
That is what I meant kman. Thanks!

I know 23, just giving you a hard time!

Great article you posted there. Nice sighting of source and all. I would love to read the rest of it.

Member Since: August 17, 2005 Posts: 26 Comments: 18190
601. hurricane23
3:54 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
This was sent to me by a friend yesterday afternoon threw email and it included Larry Cosgrove's thoughts on this summer and the tropics in 2007.For those how dont know Larry he is a broadcast/private meteorologist always gives a very detailed forcast.

Here is part of his thoughts on the tropics...

The Tropics
After a long period of westerly flow dominating the equatorial regions, GOES
EAST and METEOSAT 2 images show a slow regrouping of deep mean easterlies
over north central Brazil and central Africa. Perhaps most importantly
(favoring future tropical cyclone formation and growth), mesoscale convective
clusters are appearing while monsoonal-type synoptic-scale groupings are
disappearing from the Amazon and Congo Basins.

Thoughts on ridge...

) When all three heat ridges (Sonoran, Bermudan, Azores) interconnect, deep
mean easterlies will increase the threat of tropical cyclone landfalls in
the Florida Peninsula and along the Gulf Coast (most likely strike: Texas) in
late summer and early autumn.

A look at the overall synoptic pattern for atmospheric features and the SST
anomalies present around and over North America would seem to favor an
abundance of hot weather and increased potential for tropical cyclone landfalls.
The presence of abundant warm water through the lower reaches of the Atlantic
Basin, an upcoming (probably moderate intensity) La Nina episode and increased
ridging from the southeast to the middle part of the U.S. favors
disturbances striking the Florida Peninsula and western Gulf Coast. Some of the systems
may recurve seaward or toward Newfoundland, depending on the position and
strength of the Azores heat ridge."

If you want his complete forcast just email me and i'll sent it to you.Adrian
Member Since: May 14, 2006 Posts: 8 Comments: 13873
600. plywoodstatenative
3:54 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Patrap you just had to say the words weaken it. i was hoping that it would be more along the line of staying strong and giving us some much needed rain.
Member Since: November 15, 2005 Posts: 16 Comments: 4189
599. Caymanite
3:00 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
WOW!! Finally, a rain shower here on 7-mile beach on Grand Cayman.Hope it will last a while.
Member Since: December 9, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 315
598. hurricane23
2:18 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Me stretch you gotta be kidding with guys here posting all kind large images lol!Anyway i was trying to post an image someone requested.Useing thumbnails is the correct way to post images during busy times but things are all quite and will likely stay that way for a couple of weeks.
Member Since: May 14, 2006 Posts: 8 Comments: 13873
597. kmanislander
2:15 PM GMT on May 03, 2007

If you mean where we live the answer is that I am on Grand Cayman in the Cayman Islands and Pottery is in Trinidad
Member Since: August 19, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 16806
596. 21N71W
2:12 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Morning All,
Patrap, what is that blob thing coming up towards Cuba at the end of the GFS x run you posted?
Member Since: August 1, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 180
595. StormJunkie
2:06 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Morning all.

23, I am just going to start calling you stretch...lol☺

No problem kman, hey where are you and pottery?
Member Since: August 17, 2005 Posts: 26 Comments: 18190
594. catastropheadjuster
2:03 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Good Morning everyone. Listen if you'll would please stop bye my blog and read it. It's important.
Member Since: August 24, 2006 Posts: 21 Comments: 3689
593. pottery
1:57 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
There is still plenty dry air, North of 10 deg. North. But the dry air is lifting North and the ITCZ is begining to lift north as well. ITCZ is still a long way south, less than 5 deg.
Member Since: October 24, 2005 Posts: 0 Comments: 26997
592. hurricane23
1:46 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Here is a pic of current SAL across the atlantic basin.More here

Adrian's Weather
Member Since: May 14, 2006 Posts: 8 Comments: 13873
590. Stormxyz
1:40 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
storyofthecane. Just wondering if you could post a pic of the SAL. I believe you posted earlier that it was weaking or at least the dry air across the atlantic was weaking.

Is there a pic you could put up? thanks in advance
589. hurricane23
1:10 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
Yea patrap the dry weather across most of florida is expected to continue.Dont see any significant rain chances anytime soon.A couple of more weeks till the rainy season gets going for us.Lets hope.

Adrian's Weather
Member Since: May 14, 2006 Posts: 8 Comments: 13873
588. Patrap
1:04 PM GMT on May 03, 2007
The GFSx shows the trouble here tommorrow..then slides it toward Fla and weakens it,..sadly. Link
Member Since: July 3, 2005 Posts: 452 Comments: 144123

Viewing: 638 - 588

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13Blog Index

Top of Page
Ad Blocker Enabled

Category 6™


Cat 6 lead authors: WU cofounder Dr. Jeff Masters (right), who flew w/NOAA Hurricane Hunters 1986-1990, & WU meteorologist Bob Henson, @bhensonweather

JeffMasters's Recent Photos

Fall Color in Pictured Rocks
Pictured Rocks Beach Day
Pictured Rocks dunes and clouds
Grizzlies in Lake Clark National Park