Born,NYC. From age 6 - 11 jotted down graphics(left hand) notes(right hand) enough to fill 4.5 moving boxes. Compiled those 32kpgs into Sciencious...
By: vis0, 3:38 AM GMT on January 29, 2012
Hope those whom read (try to decipher*) my wxu blog notice by what i state we are in a Galacsic window change. As of ~Jan 21st (~2wk physics lag/friction to change) its the last third of the Galacsic descending season. Lets see whats in store, hope you noticed that as soon as we went through the ascension on the sun towards the right hand side of the universe (as to the Northern Hemispheres viewpoint only) aka: days getting longer, it became more active. As i stated a few weeks before why this should happen and how the ml-d influence at nearly #2.3 would seemingly look like all of a sudden winter and tornadic storms came back.
*hey if thousands take their time to decipher drawings of ancient times why not words that might have "Gnowledge"** and the writer is still alive thus one can find more info directly from me instead of guessing what i meant years after my passing.
By: vis0, 1:08 PM GMT on January 20, 2012
'cause of the 'ml-d' its AOI will receive 3 to 3.5 times the amount of precip. for the winter storm passing the NE around 2120122 than if the 'ml-d' in nyc did not existed or was set to ON(cycle) or if we get 3''only < 1'' to a dusting would have fallen w/o the ml-d, if we see 6'' then only 2-3 '' would have fallen w/o the ml-d, etc.
Tis crazy comment comes from knowing that we are still in the middle area of the present 'Descending Galacsic season' of this 'Galacsic Year' i.e. a Galacsic year is from spring (true passover) Till the next (true passover). That Galacsic year is divided into the ascending Galacsic season and the descending Galacsic season respectively spring/summer & fall/winter. Now each Galacsic season is divided into thirds this present third began ~November 21st (~2 week delay for Galacsic influence/energies to steer the physical properties of the dimension we live in) and it ends ~January 1st 2012. Now if the 'ml-d' is set to influence its AOI at nearly 2 times the output (for 3 of its 5 settings 2 left at null) then if the precip. for this THIRD in the ml-d's AOI IS AT A SLIGHT DROUGHT OR 1.5 TO 2.0 TIMES BELOW THE "NORM" AS TO PRECIP. IN THE ML-D'S AOI. THAT MEANS WITHOUT THE 'ML-D' set as it is we'd have a serious drought in the northeast to southeast. i hope someone chooses to test the device so i could turn it off before the tornadic season if not whatever was to occur it will be ~2 times that hopefully its to be a very low activity year, but since i stopped reading NASAs star charts last year i don't know what is to occur naturally as i did at over 95% accurate including the Atlantic tropical season from the 1980s till 2011 and sent for ~15 of those years my predictions to NWS, the weather Channel, Colorado St. &several other media outlets. The ball is in the scientific community's court, either we test the 'ml-d' in Africa in a non battle zone country/area that needs precip or i leave it ON over the U.S. of A or whatever area of the world i happen to be visiting [for ml-d's AOI triggered earthquakes near nyc see previous blogbits ,peace
By: vis0, 11:36 AM GMT on January 11, 2012
Fronts /LOWs that would "poof" not make it through the drier air masses during this descending Galacsic trimester (began Nov ~21st 2011 till Jan 21st 2012, with a ~2 wk delay on both ends) now 'cause of the explain Sun's affect on the "ml-d" and the"ml-d"'s settings close to #2.3 will lead to storms slowly building / holding more moisture/wind mixing...of course one could say its just the sun's rays angle's coming to a more direct angle as to the Northern Hemisphere and physics. That's where i have to control my ego 'cause the only real way to prove this "ml-d" really works is in a LAB (no scientist, science related media outlet or research site ever responded to my many requests to do this)or to test it in the real world. The problem with the latter is during natural droughts of 1.5 to 2 times the dryness as to the normal precip. for an area if the "ml-d" is not set above 2 times the norm ("ml-d" set above #2.3, explained on earlier blogbits how above this #, quakes near or above the Richter scales 4.0 seem to be triggered) to generate precip. conditions, then it appears as if its still a drought or just normal precip pattern and that's what i state has occurred from Nov 2011 till the present Jan 11th 2012. PLEASE REMEMBER TO LOOK AT THE ML-D 'S AOI AND SEE HOW FROM THE MID ATLANTIC TO THE MID-WEST ACTIVITY BEGINS TO CHURN.
NOW IF THE GALACSIC SEASON TO FOLLOW TRENDS FOR A NORMAL SEASON AS TO TWO, GOT THAT TWO GALACSIC LATITUDE AREAS WHICH INCLUDE FROM TEXAS TO CHICAGO EXTREME SOUTHERN CANADA TO ~40% INTO THE ATLANTIC (WEST TO EAST) DOWN TO FLORIDA COAST THEN THOSE AREAS WILL HAVE ~ 2 TIMES THE NORM IN PRECIP. / STORMS OR IN OTHER WORD DOUBLE WHAT IS TO OCCUR IF NO ML-D EXISTED. ,Y HEART BREAKS WHEN THIS OCCURS AND TORRENTIAL FLOODS TO MASSIVE TORNADO OUTBREAKS OCCUR BUT ITS THE ONLY I CAN TEST THE "ML-D"U TILL SOME LAB / SCIENCE RESEARCH GROUP ASKS ME TO PROVE IT IN A LAB OR BETTER YET SOME NON PROFIT GROUP BRINGS ME/ THE ML-D TO A DROUGHT STRICKEN AREA OF THE WORLD FOR 3 TO 4 MONTHS (THAT HAS LITTLE SEISMIC ACTIVITY LIKE AREAS OF AFRICA)TO SEE IF THE ML-D CAN ATTRACT FIRST CLOUDS THEN PRECIP
By: vis0, 4:59 AM GMT on January 04, 2012
(words within quotes are words i made up to describe parts of a science i call "Galacsic" or inventions that work via Galacsics. The 5 categorizes of sciences to me are physics - quantum m - galacsics - ....)
Tweaked the "ml-d" to ~#2.26 and please take note that as we head towards the Sun's max more direct light interactions with Earth's northern hemisphere (~june 20/21st) the more the time within every day (24 hrs.) that the "ml-d" setting "hg-bulges" upward. In other words JUST AS AN SAMPLE: if i set the "ml-d" at #2.20 and its June, the ascending "hg-bulge" (created by direct light, (indirect light) heat, friction, gravity & 1 more thing) causes the "ml-d" setting to rise past #2.3 for 4-6 hours. While during December the "hg-bulge" will have "ml-d" setting to rise pass #2.3 for no more than ~2 hours, so if i state that a quake is more likely to be triggered by an "across the board" setting of #2.3, then if the setting is just under #2.3 then the odds are greater of a quake being triggered between December 21st towards June 22nd, as opposed to June 22nd thru Dec 21st.
i state the "hg-bulge" affect as it means the "ml-d" will have a greater effect on its AOI as to its settings of ALMOST 2 times the precip., winds & temperatures. (last year 2010-11 i had it set for precip., winds & directional flow (creates more turbulence / crosswinds throughout the levwls of atmospheres)
If one wonders to ask: but, if the ml-d was almost set to the same precip. why was the same area last year pounded by precip / snow, simple i state the "ml-d" influences WHAT IS TO OCCUR VIA WHAT I CALL "GALACSIC TREND" SO IF THE "GALACSIC" TREND FROM
LATE FALL 2011 TILL THE PRESENT WAS TOBE IN A DROUGHT IN THE "ML-D'S" AOI (MAINLY THE NORTHEAST SEARCH: ML-D,NYC, AOI) THEN THE ML-D AT ~#2.3 BALANCES OUT WHAT SEEMS TO HAVE BEEN REGULAR DROUGHT PERIOD INTO AN AVERAGE PRECIP. OR JUST BELOW AVERAGE, FROM LATE FALL TO THE PRESENT
NOW THE "GALACSIC" SEASONS FLOW IN A CALENDAR YEAR IN AN ASCENDING AND DESCENDING YEARLY CYCLE(S) AND THE FULL "GALACSIC CYCLE" TAKES ~ 8 YEARS AND ARE WHAT INFLUENCES ROSSBY WAVES TO SOLAR ACTIVITY'S PRIMARY WINDOW (explained from my 1970s notes how that influences the sun's 8-11yr cycle of several journal sites including on livejournal AS "AKAMRX"). Also why since ~1980s till last year my predictions sent to science and media outlets or on the webnet where at 95% plus accurate at real long term 8 year predictions, its not me its the science of Galacsics.
AGAIN THIS IS AS TO A MAN MADE AFFECT as in nature earthquakes do not follow any weather events / patterns, but when it involves my use of the "ml-d" it seems to follow certain weather events being i am not focusing the "ml-d's" gravity vortex onto a specific layer of the planet, but the an entire "Galacsic longitude zone" (the latter i have explain with maps on several web sites from myfox, sevenload, ipernity, search my blogbits here for those links. )