hcubed's WunderBlog

Someone won the superball lottery.
Posted by: hcubed, 2:45 PM GMT on November 29, 2012 +0
Wasn't me...
  Permalink | A A A
Another season closing, start next year's prep now.
Posted by: hcubed, 3:23 PM GMT on November 28, 2012 +0
Well, as of today, there are 2 days left in the 2012 season - and it ends with 19 named storms.

We made it to Tony this year.

Looks like (unless they modify the list), we went 19/9/1 - looks like Michael was the only "major".

So we keep a record going - we're now to 2601 since a "major" hit the U.S. mainland (a storm with winds equal to or greater than 111mph).

That's unprecedented. Or, just plain dumb luck.

Sure, they'll be talking about Sandy for years (it's gonna take years to get everything back into some semblance of order).

There are still places in Mississippi that don't have anything built back.

But as bad as Sandy was, it wasn't like Camille. Or Elena. Or Katrina.

Some will try to blame Sandy on a CO2 level of .00039103 (391.03 parts per MILLION) - which, according to some, is about .00004103 above the upper safe level for humanity.

Then again, they blame every single weather event since the dawn of time on CO2, so I guess I can thank the world's biggest emitters (China and India) for the 7 straight seasons I haven't had to run.

But I'll still pack. I'll still prepare. But I won't spend time on needless panic - until the next major barrels down on us.
Updated: 8:39 PM GMT on November 28, 2012   Permalink | A A A
One college cutting hours to avoid Obamacare.
Posted by: hcubed, 2:27 AM GMT on November 23, 2012 +0
Link

"...Pennsylvania's Community College of Allegheny County (CCAC) is slashing the hours of 400 adjunct instructors, support staff, and part-time instructors to dodge paying for Obamacare.

"It's kind of a double whammy for us because we are facing a legal requirement [under the new law] to get health care and if the college is reducing our hours, we don't have the money to pay for it," said adjunct biology professor Adam Davis.

On Tuesday, CCAC employees were notified that Obamacare defines full-time employees as those working 30 hours or more per week and that on Dec. 31 temporary part-time employees will be cut back to 25 hours. The move will save an estimated $6 million.

"While it is of course the college’s preference to provide coverage to these positions, there simply are not funds available to do so," said CCAC spokesperson David Hoovler. "Several years of cuts or largely flat funding from our government supporters have led to significant cost reductions by CCAC, leaving little room to trim the college’s budget further."

The solution, says United Steelworkers representative Jeff Cech, is that adjunct professors should unionize in an attempt to thwart schools seeking similar cost-savings efforts from avoiding Obamacare.

"They may be complying with the letter of the law, but the letter of law and the spirit of the law are two different things," said Mr. Cech. "If they are doing it at CCAC, it can't be long before they do it other places."

Under the new CCAC policy, adjunct professors will only be allowed to teach 10 credit hours a semester. Adjuncts are paid $730 per credit hour.

"We all know we are expendable," said Mr. Davis, "and there are plenty of people out there in this economy who would be willing to have our jobs."

*** And if anyone thinks that this will only be colleges that will use this "loophole" to save money, they're crazy.

But the other "option" - unionization - may be a double-edged sword. True, the union might force the college to give them the 30 hours needed to get full-time (and even get a raise in pay).

But the only way to pay the increased salary (and the estimated $6 million in Obamacare funding) is either increase the tuition or reduce the staff.

They don't seem to be concerned on the students. No mention of them anywhere in the story.
  Permalink | A A A
Longest heatwave record still standing after 89 years.
Posted by: hcubed, 5:27 AM GMT on November 20, 2012 +0
Well, since Tamino has shown he reads here, and since he has a problem posting replies from "non-believers", I'll simply repeat his post, then ask a question:

"...Since the turn of the millenium, we’ve been struck by some truly notable and very damaging heat waves. Probably foremost in the memory of those who follow such things are the 2003 European heat wave, 2010 in the Moscow region, and just this year in the U.S.

Those heat waves are very hot summertime events. But depending on what one calls a “heat wave,” it can strike at any time of year. The World Meteorological Organization defines a heat wave as when “the daily maximum temperature of more than five consecutive days exceeds the average maximum temperature by 5 °C (9 °F), the normal period being 1961–1990.” By this definition they can happen at any location during any season, even wintertime in Antarctica..."

So, since a heat wave is defined as a period in which "the daily maximum temperature of more than five consecutive days exceeds the average maximum temperature by 5 °C (9 °F), the normal period being 1961–1990", would you say that the record set in Marble Bar (Western Australia) of most consecutive days of maximum temperatures of 37.8 degrees Celsius (100 degrees Fahrenheit) or more, during a period of 160 such days from 31 October 1923 to 7 April 1924 classify as a "...truly notable and very damaging heat wave..."?

If it does classify as such, and if "...heat waves are one of the most dangerous aspects of global warming..." then how is it possible that this record still has not been met or exceeded - 89 years later - anywhere else in the world?

A warmer world = longer heatwaves, yet the 160 day period still stands. Even the source (Marble Bar) hasn't come close, has it? Wouldn't one expect that area (where temperatures in excess of 45 °C (113 °F) are common, and the average maximum temperature exceeds normal human body temperature for 6 months each year) to become even HOTTER?
  Permalink | A A A
Stockpile Twinkies while you can.
Posted by: hcubed, 1:09 AM GMT on November 17, 2012 +1
"...Hostess, the makers of Twinkies, Ding Dongs and Wonder Bread, is going out of business after striking workers failed to heed a Thursday deadline to return to work, the company said.

“We deeply regret the necessity of today’s decision, but we do not have the financial resources to weather an extended nationwide strike,” Hostess CEO Gregory F. Rayburn said in announcing that the firm had filed a motion with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to shutter its business. “Hostess Brands will move promptly to lay off most of its 18,500-member workforce and focus on selling its assets to the highest bidders.”

Hostess Brands Inc. had earlier warned employees that it would file to unwind its business and sell off assets if plant operations didn't return to normal levels by 5 p.m. Thursday. In announcing its decision, Hostess said its wind down would mean the closure of 33 bakeries, 565 distribution centers, approximately 5,500 delivery routes and 570 bakery outlet stores in the United States..."

source: nbcdfw.com

Well, another 18,500 people will be eligible for 93 weeks of unemployment.
  Permalink | A A A
Battleground states lose big - again.
Posted by: hcubed, 2:01 AM GMT on November 16, 2012 +0
"November Surprise"

"...The Department of Labor has announced that new jobless claims rose by a staggering 78,000 in the first week after the election, reaching a seasonally-adjusted total of 439,000. Over the past year, and in the weeks leading up to the election, jobless claims were said to be declining, dipping as low as 339,000, with the media proclaiming that they had reached the "lowest level in more than four years." Now, suddenly, the news seems far less rosy.

From the Department of Labor press release this morning:

In the week ending November 10, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 439,000, an increase of 78,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 361,000. The 4-week moving average was 383,750, an increase of 11,750 from the previous week's revised average of 372,000.

Some of the new claims, especially in New Jersey, were due to Hurricane Sandy--but these were offset by a decline in claims filed in New York. The highest numbers of new filings came from Pennsylvania and Ohio, where there were thousands of layoffs in the construction, manufacturing, and automobile industries.

Both states had been targeted by the presidential campaigns. President Obama highlighted his record of job creation in Ohio in particular, focusing on the automobile industry. The state reported 6,450 new jobless claims in the week after the election--second-highest after Pennsylvania, which recorded 7,766 new claims..."

"...reaching a seasonally-adjusted total of 439,000..."

That seems like the number of votes Obama won those states by. And, in 93 weeks, just before the mid-term, their benefits should be running out.

November 2014 is gonna be fun...
  Permalink | A A A
A new Union forming? UPDATED, now from all 50 states.
Posted by: hcubed, 8:45 PM GMT on November 13, 2012 +0
Earlier, I put up a list of the "super 12" - those states that would allow a candidate to be elected president by wining the popular vote in just 11 of them:

California (55)
New York (29)
Texas (38)
Florida (29)
Pennsylvania (20)
Illinois (18)
Ohio (16)
Michigan (16)
New Jersey (14)
North Carolina (15)
Georgia (16)
Virginia (13)

Well in the aftermath of the election, another list has formed - states that have put in petitions to the Gov't to let them withdraw “peacefully” from the United States.

The White House has a website (Link) allowing citizens to put forth petitions for Gov't consideration.

23 states *** Correction - now it's all 50.

That's right, 50 states have petitions pending.

According to the rules of the site, any petition receiving 25,000 online “signatures” on the “We the People” page within 30 days of posting will receive a review by the appropriate executive department and a response from a White House staffer.

So far, Texas has enough. Petitions from Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, North Carolina and Tennessee also have accrued at least 25,000 signatures, the number the Obama administration says it will reward with a staff review of online proposals.

Residents of these states have expressed interest in dissolving their relationship with the United States. Of course, since it's on the internet, it doesn't say you have to be a resident of the state to be counted.

Still, there's a growing concern, and a "rebuttal" petition:

"...A White House petition gathering force calls for citizenship to be stripped and exile for anyone who signs a petition in favor of a state's secession.

"Mr. President, please sign an executive order such that each American citizen who signed a petition from any state to secede from the USA shall have their citizenship stripped and be peacefully deported," the full petition reads.

The title of the petition is, "WE PETITION THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO: Strip the Citizenship from Everyone who Signed a Petition to Secede and Exile Them."

As of this writing, 2,205 have signed the petition; 22,795 more signatures are needed for the issue to be addressed by the White House..."

"...shall have their citizenship stripped..."

I guess somebody doesn't realize what secession means. They WANT to pull away, and handle their OWN affairs.

No taxation. No "representation".
Updated: 3:47 AM GMT on November 15, 2012   Permalink | A A A
Ohio - a battleground state, loses funds.
Posted by: hcubed, 7:04 AM GMT on November 13, 2012 +0
Ohioans’ food stamp aid to be reduced

Benefit to fall $50 a month starting in January

BY KATE GIAMMARISE BLADE STAFF WRITER

"...Ohio families receiving food stamps could get an unwelcome surprise come January: $50 less every month in assistance.

For the 869,000 households enrolled in the program for the poorest Ohioans, that could amount to about $520 million annually out of the grocery budgets.

Because of the way the federal government calculates utility expenses for people receiving the benefit, a mild winter nationwide last year, and a lower price for natural gas, many families could experience a significant cut in aid, those familiar with the program say.

Recipients should get a letter from the state Department of Job and Family Services this month explaining the change, said Ben Johnson, a spokesman for the agency.

Meanwhile, food banks and others that distribute food assistance are bracing for increased demand.

“They are going to increase hunger among our most vulnerable — working families, seniors, children, and persons with disabilities,” said Lisa Hamler-Fugitt, executive director of the Ohio Association of Foodbanks.

Ms. Hamler-Fugitt said her organization is particularly concerned that some seniors or persons with disabilities who have a low benefit amount could lose all their monthly assistance.

“We’re really worried about [the change],” she said..."

Later on, they say that one county, Lucas county, has about 91,000 people — 46,000 households — receive the benefit. Fifty fewer dollars per household per month would amount to about $27 million annually.

So how did the election results go for Lucas County, Ohio?

Obama/Biden (D) 129,229 or 64.44%
Romney/Ryan (R) 68,100 or 33.96%

So apparently there were at least 197,329 eligible voters in the county, and 91,000 residents get aid. Just that alone (91,000/197,329 or about 46.1%) shows the state of that county.

Voted for "hope and change". Seems like they've got it. And the gov't saves money as a result.
Updated: 7:28 AM GMT on November 13, 2012   Permalink | A A A
Bill McKibben needs a climate history lesson.
Posted by: hcubed, 12:26 AM GMT on November 12, 2012 +0
Once again, we recall the paraphrase of an old line: "...Those who forget historical extreme weather events are doomed to proclaim current extreme weather events are unprecedented".

Bill McKibben’s claims about Sandy in this LA Times story were just a LITTLE off:

"...Sandy was off-the-charts terrible, a storm that broke every record in the books: for storm surge, for barometric pressure, for sheer size..."

The reality of historical extreme weather events blows his “off-the-charts terrible” claims right out of the water:

First: "...a storm that broke every record in the books..."

Well, not every record - for example, the Great Bhola Cyclone, Bangladesh 1970 (Bay of Bengal) was credited with 500,000 deaths.

One down. Maybe he'll have better luck with the other claims.

Second: "...for storm surge...".

Source: Link

"...The Bathurst Bay Cyclone, also known as Tropical Cyclone Mahina, which struck Bathurst Bay, Australia on March 5, 1899, is generally credited with the world record for storm surge. The cyclone's storm surge is variously listed at 13 - 14.6 meters (43 - 48 feet). The Category 5 cyclone was a monster--with sustained winds in excess of 175 mph and a central pressure between 880 and 914 mb. Mahina killed at least 307 people, mostly on pearling ships, and was the deadliest cyclone in Australian history..." From Dr. Masters, PhD, Director of Meteorology, Weather Underground, Inc.

Missed out on the storm surge.

Third: "...for barometric pressure..."

Depends on whether or not he means Atlantic or worldwide. Either way, he's wrong:

Source: wiki

"...In the available records, a total of 70 tropical cyclones attained a pressure of less than 900 hPa (mbar) (26.56 inHg), most of which occurred in the Western North Pacific Ocean. The strongest tropical cyclone recorded worldwide, as measured by minimum central pressure, was Typhoon Tip, which reached a pressure of 870 hPa (25.69 inHg) on October 12, 1979..."

Ok, not worldwide. Maybe Atlantic?

Hurricane Sandy had the lowest pressure ever recorded for any storm north of North Carolina at 943 millibars just before it came in from the sea and hit the New Jersey coast.

But in the full Atlantic? Wilma, 2005 (882/26.0). Also the last Major to make US landfall.

So in a small sub-set of a small subset of the world (N Atlantic, East coast of the US and north of North Carolina), there's the record. But Sandy was in no way the lowest pressure ever.

And last, "...for sheer size..."

Well, let's start worldwide again.

Tip

"...After passing Guam, it rapidly intensified and reached peak winds of 305 km/h (190 mph) and a worldwide record low sea-level pressure of 870 mbar (870.0 hPa; 25.69 inHg) on October 12. At its peak strength, it was also the largest tropical cyclone on record with a wind diameter of 2,220 km (1,380 mi)..."

Seems like Tip (1979) beat Sandy on two counts.

Surely somewhere, there is a sub-set of a sub-set that Sandy comes in first.

Well, yes - the Atlantic - using data from the satellite record (and TIROS1, launched in 1960).

Sandy, 2012 - 945mi, 1,520km.
Tip, 1979 - 1380mi, 2,220 km.

So this one is probable, Atlantic only, and during the satellite record.

But did Sandy break ALL records?

No way.

It's telling that Hurricane Sandy gets a portion of it's wiki writeup about "Relation to global warming", while the most intense storm recorded, Tip, doesn't get that mention.
  Permalink | A A A
CAGW believers get an early Christmas present.
Posted by: hcubed, 2:06 AM GMT on November 10, 2012 +0
"...NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- A coal company headed by a prominent Mitt Romney donor has laid off more than 160 workers in response to President Obama's election victory.

Murray Energy said Friday that it had been "forced" to make the layoffs in response to the bleak prospects for the coal industry during Obama's second term. In a prayer circulated by the company, CEO Robert Murray said Americans had voted "in favor of redistribution, national weakness and reduced standard of living and lower and lower levels of personal freedom."

"The American people have made their choice. They have decided that America must change its course, away from the principals [sic] of our Founders," Murray said in the prayer, which was delivered in a meeting with staff members earlier this week.

"Lord, please forgive me and anyone with me in Murray Energy Corporation for the decisions that we are now forced to make to preserve the very existence of any of the enterprises that you have helped us build."

Murray cited pending regulations from the Environmental Protection Agency and the possibility of a carbon tax as factors that could lead to the "total destruction of the coal industry by as early as 2030." One hundred and two layoffs are planned for Murray operations in Utah, with 54 from Illinois and seven from West Virginia..."

So, less coal miners, less coal being dug up, and fewer "coal trains of death".

CAGW has a win - 160 workers have a loss.

But hey, since they were fired, they get 93 weeks of extended federal unemployment benefits (Qualified claimants who were unemployed during certain periods in 2008 and 2009 can receive up to 99 weeks of federal-state unemployment benefits. After March 23, 2009, claimants are only eligible to receive up to 93 weeks of benefits).

That will keep them going until just before the mid-term elections. Great timing, eh?
  Permalink | A A A
What did we know, when did we know it...
Posted by: hcubed, 12:04 AM GMT on November 09, 2012 +0
...and why weren't we told BEFORE the election?

"...Iran fired on an unarmed U.S. drone last week as it was hovering in international airspace, the Pentagon announced Thursday.

Spokesman George Little said the incident occurred Nov. 1 at 4:50 a.m. ET. He said the unarmed, unmanned drone was conducting "routine surveillance" over the Persian Gulf when it was "intercepted" by Iran. He said the MQ1 Predator drone, which was not hit, was not in Iranian airspace.

On Twitter, Fox News' Jennifer Griffin follows up by saying the attack on the American drone by Iran was not revealed until after the election because it was a "classified" mission.

DoD didn't reveal Iranian fighter jets fired at US drone in days before the US Presidential election because drone on "classified" mission.

— Jennifer Griffin (@JenGriffinFNC) November 8, 2012..."

Wow, seems how the "classified" mission was only listed as such for a week - from Nov 1st to Nov 8th.

I guess they didn't want to scare us into making a wrong decision at the polls...
  Permalink | A A A
Well, the sheeple have spoken.
Posted by: hcubed, 3:16 PM GMT on November 07, 2012 +0
303 Obama, 206 Romney.

Since 538 were available, that means FL hasn't been called for either one. Could still go 303/235

Votes still being processed in a few states:

Example, as of now, Obama leads Romney by 46,039 in the state of FL. Those 29 are still up in the air.

So what do the people get?

Four more years.

Are there any silver linings?

A few.

1. Presidents are limited to two terms. So this will be, good or bad, Obama's last term (god help us).

2. In 2016, the states will have gotten wiser, and will finally straighten out the voter ID battle.

3. We can finally put the "blame Bush for everything" idea to rest. This term Obama has his first term to overcome. Can't blame the debt or deficits on Bush, can he?

4. The House still is being held by Republicans, and there is no super majority in the Senate. You thought you've seen a stalemate before? Watch these next two years carefully. In 2014, we'll see who holds Congress then.

5. We'll see the results of an experiment - what would have happened if Carter had gotten a second term? We're about to find out.

There are people out there that don't understand some things about the Congress. Certain things that either have to start in the House, or be confirmed by the House (such as raising the debt ceiling).

The big one? Article I, Section 7 states that all revenue bills shall originate in the House of Representatives (Appropriations bills, the budget, taxation).

Bills, for example that fund Obamacare.

Obama doesn't control the House (thank god).
  Permalink | A A A
Please, vote.
Posted by: hcubed, 5:00 PM GMT on November 06, 2012 +0
Well, it's election day, and now the American people have a chance to determine the course of events - and the person that will lead the nation.

I'm not going to influence you as to who you'll cast your vote for - the power of the secret ballot is sacred.

Just don't let anyone intimidate you at the polls.

BTW, there is an interesting fact:

"...A look at the Electoral Votes From Each State and a little math will tell you that the Electoral College system makes it possible for a candidate to actually lose the nationwide popular vote, but be elected president by the Electoral College.

In fact, it is possible for a candidate to not get a single person's vote -- not one -- in 39 states or the District of Columbia, yet be elected president by wining the popular vote in just 11 of these 12 states:

California (55)
New York (29) - went to Obama
Texas (38) - went to Romney
Florida (29)
Pennsylvania (20) - went to Obama
Illinois (18) - went to Obama
Ohio (16)
Michigan (16) - went to Obama
New Jersey (14) - went to Obama
North Carolina (15)
Georgia (16) - went to Romney
Virginia (13)

There are 538 total votes in the Electoral College and a presidential candidate must win a majority -- 270 -- electoral votes to be elected. Since 11 of the 12 states in the chart above account for exactly 270 votes, a candidate could win these states, lose the other 39, and still be elected..."

Of course, it depends on WHICH of the 12 states listed they lose - if they lost Virginia's 13, they'd win.

If they lost California's 55 votes, it would be a harder battle, but could still win 270.

So watch those states closely...
Updated: 2:39 AM GMT on November 07, 2012   Permalink | A A A
The record still holds.
Posted by: hcubed, 1:40 PM GMT on November 01, 2012 +0
This year, we've managed to make it all the way up to Tony, for a total of 19 storms.

While that's a long way from the 2005 record of 31 storms (and 4 of those were added after the season), it's good to remember a few things.

First, we'll look at the seasons following (taken from the NHC database):

2006 10 total (5 TS, 5 Hurr)
2007 17 total (1 STS, 2 TD, 8 TS, 6 Hurr)
2008 17 total (1 TD, 8 TS, 8 Hurr)
2009 11 total (2 TD, 6 TS, 3 Hurr)
2010 21 total (2 TD, 7 TS, 12 Hurr)
2011 20 total (1 TD, 12 TS, 7 Hurr)

Wow. For all the seasons from 2006-2011, there was a total of 96 tropical storms. Of those, only 41 made it to Hurricane strength. 41/96 = .427, or less than half.

Now, then, on to the strengths.

Remember, there were those after the 2005 season that said we'd see stronger and more frequent storms like Katrina.

2006 - 3 Cat 1's, and 2 Cat 3's. Neither of the Cat 3's hit the Mainland US.

2007 - 4 Cat 1's, and 2 Cat 5's. Neither of the Cat 5's hit the Mainland US.

2008 - 3 Cat 1's, 1 Cat 3, and 4 Cat 4's. The strongest winds to hit the Mainland US was Ike (hit as a high end Cat 2 with 95mph winds). Still had no Majors hit the US.

2009 - One 4, one 3 and one 2. No Majors hit the Mainland US.

As a running recap, then for the 4 years following 2005, we saw 22 of the 41 previously mentioned hurricanes. There were 10 Cat 1's (10/22 = .454), 1 Cat 2 (1/22 = .045), 4 Cat 3's (4/22 = .181), 5 Cat 4's (5/22 = .227) and 2 Cat 5's (2/22 = .090).

Overall, half of the hurricanes were 1's and 2's, and half were Majors. And none of the Majors had a US mainland landfall.

Found the time to look at the years of 2010 and 2011, to see what those 19 hurricanes did.

2010 - 3 cat 1's, 4 Cat 2's, 1 Cat 3 and 4 Cat 4's. Nothing hit the US as a Major.

2011 - 3 cat 1's, 2 Cat 3's and 2 Cat 4's. Nothing hit the US as a major.

So the years of 2010 and 2011 accounted for 19 of the 41 previously mentioned hurricanes. There were 6 Cat 1's (6/19 = .315), 4 Cat 2's (4/19 = .210), 3 Cat 3's (3/19 = .157), 6 Cat 4's (6/19 = .315) and NO Cat 5's.

That means that of the 19 hurricanes, 10 were Cat 1 or 2, and 9 were Majors.

For the whole period, then?

Slight edge to non-Majors (21/20).

Last cat 5 of the period was Felix in 2007. Last Major to make landfall in the US was Wilma, 2005.

Even if you were to carry it through to 2012 (and the season's not over yet) with the 9 TS and 10 Hurricanes (9/1), there has STILL been no Cat 5's, and no Majors hitting the US.

Raises the edge to non-Majors even more (30/21).

So while people may look as Sandy (and last year's Irene) as truly devestating storms, they were not Majors.

And if people are going to rightly say that a single storm cannot be tied to CAGW, that you need to see the trend, fine.

So far, as of today, it's been 2565 days since the US has been hit by a hurricane with sustained winds greater than 110mph.

Of course, that trend (along with the decided lack of Cat 5 storms for the last 5 seasons) cannot be blamed on CAGW either.

Neither can the higher number of non-majors over majors since 2005.

Where have all the Majors gone?
Updated: 7:19 PM GMT on November 01, 2012   Permalink | A A A