Dog and Cat house

By: auburn, 3:31 PM GMT on May 28, 2010


Welcome to da Doghouse...right Clem?




Updated: 5:21 PM GMT on May 29, 2010

Permalink

Welcome to the DogHouse

By: auburn, 4:03 AM GMT on May 22, 2010


Welcome to da Doghouse...right Clem?


GOPers Try To Derail Tea Party Favorite
Zachary Roth | May 25, 2010, 10:42AM
North Carolina Republicans are circulating court documents that suggest a far-right Tea-Party-backed congressional candidate claimed to be the Messiah, tried to raise his stepfather from the dead, believed God would drop a 1,000-mile high pyramid as the New Jerusalem on Greenland, and found the Ark of the Covenant in Arizona.

Tim D'Annunzio also has written that he wants to abolish several key government departments, including the IRS. But there's more going on here than just another wacky conservative politician. The effort by GOP leaders to stop D'Annunzio at all costs offers an intriguing test case of their ability to keep control of the party in the face of challenges from the Tea Party wing. Or as D'Annunzio himself has put it: "The power brokers in Raleigh and in Washington are willing to go to any length and use any unscrupulous tactic to try to destroy somebody. They think that they're losing their control over the Republican party."

D'Annunzio is seeking the GOP nomination to take on Rep. Larry Kissell (D-NC) this fall. He was the leader in a primary earlier this month, but didn't win enough of the vote to avoid a runoff in June. The state and national party is backing his opponent, former T.V. sportscaster Harold Johnson. And how.

"I consider Mr. D'Annunzio unfit for public office at any level," Tom Fetzer, the North Carolina GOP chair, told reporters recently. "What he could do to the party as our nominee is secondary in my view to what he could do to the country if he got elected." And a spokesman for the NRCC said: "The issue is, do we give Democrats a candidate that they can absolutely tear apart in the general election? I don't think most Republicans want to see that happen."

To undermine D'Annunzio, the state GOP has been circulating records from his 1995 divorce and from a 1998 child support judgment. In the latter, as the Charlotte Observer reported Sunday, the judge called D'Annunzio "a self-described religious zealot," and wrote that D'Annunzio had "described the government as the 'Antichrist'."

In the divorce case, Anne D'Annunzio said her husband had told her that "God was going to drop a 1,000-mile high pyramid" on Greenland, and also that he had found the Ark of the Covenant in Arizona, among other unusual beliefs.

In addition, a doctor wrote in the custody proceedings that D'Annunzio told him he had once received treatment for heroin dependence, and was jailed three times for offenses that included burglary and assaulting a police officer.

D'Annunzio says his personal problems are in all in the past. But the Born Again candidate still has some pretty extreme political ideas. On a blog he writes, entitled "Christ's War," D'Annunzio declared earlier this year that he wanted to "abolish the Departments of Education, Health and Human Services, Agriculture, Energy, Labor, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Transportation, Treasury, and Home Land Security," and the IRS, as well as "any appellate court that has shown an anti Constitutional activism." He also advocated giving control of Social Security and Medicare to the states.

In March, one of D'Annunzio's top advisers -- a respected North Carolina political hand -- left the campaign over the candidate's refusal to stop posting to the blog.

D'Annunzio won the primary after spending more than $1 million of his own money. In 1999, D'Annunzio, who had served in the army, started a company that makes bullet-proof vests and sells them to the military. Business surged after 9/11, and in 2006 he sold the company for $30 million.

D'Annunzio's run for office poses a direct challenge to the Republican Party -- and not just because party leaders fear he could prove unelectable in the fall. Like some other Tea Party supported candidates, D'Annunzio often seems to be running against the GOP while seeking its nomination. "The Republicans ought to be worried about the Republican Party," he told the Observer. "This is why the Republican Party has seen its day ... Both parties have seen their day."

And some conservative activists seem to like that stance. "He's not the kind of person the parties can rule over and manipulate," one local Tea Party activist who's backing D'Annunzio told the AP.

Last week, Rand Paul used the support of Tea Partiers to win the GOP nomination for Kentucky's U.S. Senate race, against a candidate backed by the party establishment -- but has since been on the defensive about his extreme positions. And Florida governor Charlie Crist, the party establishment's pick in that state's Senate race, ended up quitting the GOP after Tea Partiers threw their support to his opponent, Marco Rubio.

Whether the GOP succeeds in derailing D'Annunzio's campaign could be an indication of its long-term ability to withstand what often seems like a hostile takeover launched by the Tea Party forces.

Left and Right brain?

Study finds left-wing brain, right-wing brain
Even in humdrum nonpolitical decisions, liberals and conservatives literally think differently, researchers show.

Exploring the neurobiology of politics, scientists have found that liberals tolerate ambiguity and conflict better than conservatives because of how their brains work.

In a simple experiment reported todayin the journal Nature Neuroscience, scientists at New York University and UCLA show that political orientation is related to differences in how the brain processes information.

Previous psychological studies have found that conservatives tend to be more structured and persistent in their judgments whereas liberals are more open to new experiences. The latest study found those traits are not confined to political situations but also influence everyday decisions.

The results show "there are two cognitive styles -- a liberal style and a conservative style," said UCLA neurologist Dr. Marco Iacoboni, who was not connected to the latest research.

Participants were college students whose politics ranged from "very liberal" to "very conservative." They were instructed to tap a keyboard when an M appeared on a computer monitor and to refrain from tapping when they saw a W.M appeared four times more frequently than W, conditioning participants to press a key in knee-jerk fashion whenever they saw a letter.

Each participant was wired to an electroencephalograph that recorded activity in the anterior cingulate cortex, the part of the brain that detects conflicts between a habitual tendency (pressing a key) and a more appropriate response (not pressing the key). Liberals had more brain activity and made fewer mistakes than conservatives when they saw a W, researchers said. Liberals and conservatives were equally accurate in recognizing M.

Researchers got the same results when they repeated the experiment in reverse, asking another set of participants to tap when a W appeared.

Frank J. Sulloway, a researcher at UC Berkeley's Institute of Personality and Social Research who was not connected to the study, said the results "provided an elegant demonstration that individual differences on a conservative-liberal dimension are strongly related to brain activity."

Analyzing the data, Sulloway said liberals were 4.9 times as likely as conservatives to show activity in the brain circuits that deal with conflicts, and 2.2 times as likely to score in the top half of the distribution for accuracy.

Sulloway said the results could explain why President Bush demonstrated a single-minded commitment to the Iraq war and why some people perceived Sen. John F. Kerry, the liberal Massachusetts Democrat who opposed Bush in the 2004 presidential race, as a "flip-flopper" for changing his mind about the conflict.

Based on the results, he said, liberals could be expected to more readily accept new social, scientific or religious ideas.

"There is ample data from the history of science showing that social and political liberals indeed do tend to support major revolutions in science," said Sulloway, who has written about the history of science and has studied behavioral differences between conservatives and liberals.

Lead author David Amodio, an assistant professor of psychology at New York University, cautioned that the study looked at a narrow range of human behavior and that it would be a mistake to conclude that one political orientation was better. The tendency of conservatives to block distracting information could be a good thing depending on the situation, he said.

Political orientation, he noted, occurs along a spectrum, and positions on specific issues, such as taxes, are influenced by many factors, including education and wealth. Some liberals oppose higher taxes and some conservatives favor abortion rights.

Still, he acknowledged that a meeting of the minds between conservatives and liberals looked difficult given the study results.

"Does this mean liberals and conservatives are never going to agree?" Amodio asked. "Maybe it suggests one reason why they tend not to get along."

Updated: 7:44 PM GMT on May 27, 2010

Permalink

Rand Paul???

By: auburn, 11:40 PM GMT on May 20, 2010


Welcome to da Doghouse...right Clem?


We are to trust that BP will do what they say they will Rand???


Rand Paul: Obama's criticism of BP 'un-American'

Published - May 21 2010 08:43AM EST

By MICHELE SALCEDO - Associated Press Writer


WASHINGTON— Kentucky's Republican Senate candidate Rand Paul criticized President Barack Obama's handling of the Gulf oil spill Friday as putting "his boot heel on the throat of BP" and "really un-American."

Paul's defense of the oil company came during an interview in which he tried to explain his controversial take on civil rights law, an issue that has overtaken his campaign since his victory in Tuesday's GOP primary.

"What I don't like from the president's administration is this sort of, 'I'll put my boot heel on the throat of BP,'" Rand said in an interview with ABC's "Good Morning America." "I think that sounds really un-American in his criticism of business."

Paul appeared two days after a landslide primary victory over the Republican establishment's candidate, Trey Grayson. He had spent most of the time since his win laboring to explain remarks suggesting businesses be allowed to deny service to blacks without fear of federal interference. On Friday said he wouldn't seek to repeal civil rights legislation.

On the oil spill, Paul, a libertarian and tea party darling, said he had heard nothing from BP indicating it wouldn't pay for the spill that threatens devastating environmental damage along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico.

"And I think it's part of this sort of blame-game society in the sense that it's always got to be somebody's fault instead of the fact that maybe sometimes accidents happen," Paul said.

The senate candidate referred to a Kentucky coal mine accident that killed two men, saying he had met with the families and he admired the coal miners' courage.

"We had a mining accident that was very tragic. ... Then we come in and it's always someone's fault. Maybe sometimes accidents happen," he said.

The political novice came under blistering scrutiny little more than 24 hours a landslide Republican primary victory. He defeated a rival recruited by Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell, and invited Obama, who never enjoyed popularity in the state, to campaign for Kentucky's Democratic candidates as a strategy toward a Republican win in November.

Paul, 47 and an eye surgeon, is making his first run for public office, and his emergence as a favorite of tea party activists has been one of the most striking developments of the early months of the midterm election campaign. In an appearance on primary night, he credited their support with powering him to his victory, and the first opinion poll since then shows him with a commanding lead over his Democratic rival, Jack Conway.

Updated: 4:01 PM GMT on May 21, 2010

Permalink

Welcome to the Dog House

By: auburn, 12:08 AM GMT on May 19, 2010

The Pledge of Allegiance


The Pledge of Allegiance was written in August 1892 by the socialist minister Francis Bellamy (1855-1931). It was originally published in The Youth's Companion on September 8, 1892. Bellamy had hoped that the pledge would be used by citizens in any country.

In its original form it read:

"I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

In 1923, the words, "the Flag of the United States of America" were added. At this time it read:

"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

In 1954, in response to the Communist threat of the times, President Eisenhower encouraged Congress to add the words "under God," creating the 31-word pledge we say today. Bellamy's daughter objected to this alteration. Today it reads:

"I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all."

Section 4 of the Flag Code states:

The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag: "I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.", should be rendered by standing at attention facing the flag with the right hand over the heart. When not in uniform men should remove any non-religious headdress with their right hand and hold it at the left shoulder, the hand being over the heart. Persons in uniform should remain silent, face the flag, and render the military salute."

The original Bellamy salute, first described in 1892 by Francis Bellamy, who authored the original Pledge, began with a military salute, and after reciting the words "to the flag," the arm was extended toward the flag, palm-down.

At a signal from the Principal the pupils, in ordered ranks, hands to the side, face the Flag. Another signal is given; every pupil gives the flag the military salute — right hand lifted, palm downward, to a line with the forehead and close to it. Standing thus, all repeat together, slowly, "I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands; one Nation indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all." At the words, "to my Flag," the right hand is extended gracefully, palm upward, toward the Flag, and remains in this gesture till the end of the affirmation; whereupon all hands immediately drop to the side.

The Youth's Companion, 1892

Shortly thereafter, the pledge was begun with the right hand over the heart, and after reciting "to the Flag," the arm was extended toward the Flag, palm-down.

In World War II, the salute too much resembled the Nazi salute, so it was changed to keep the right hand over the heart throughout.


Welcome to da Doghouse...right Clem?

Updated: 3:06 PM GMT on May 19, 2010

Permalink

Happy Birthay Bonnie(My wife of 25 years)

By: auburn, 8:10 PM GMT on May 12, 2010

Both my girls are gonna have chilens..I am so excited!they both work full time and are in collage!




All my girls...





Welcome to da Doghouse...right Clem?


Back when we were all like a big ol Family..been looking at old WU get together pictures and had a tear come to my eye...

Updated: 4:44 PM GMT on May 15, 2010

Permalink

Gonna be a GranDaddy X2

By: auburn, 3:21 PM GMT on May 10, 2010

Both my girls are gonna have chilens..I am so excited!they both work full time and are in collage!




All my girls...





Welcome to da Doghouse...right Clem?


Back when we were all like a big ol Family..been looking at old WU get together pictures and had a tear come to my eye...

Updated: 11:11 PM GMT on May 11, 2010

Permalink

Welcome to the DogHouse

By: auburn, 5:39 PM GMT on May 07, 2010

To inform and motivate.

Difference of opinion is welcome as long as it is respectful disagreement in civil discourse; comments that are intentionally only antagonistic or that are abusive or spammed will lead to a swift ban.

NO PERSONAL ATTACKS...if ya dont like some one take it up in Wumail


Welcome to da Doghouse...right Clem?

Permalink

The DogHouse

By: auburn, 6:13 PM GMT on May 03, 2010

NO PERSONAL ATTACKS...if ya dont like some one take it up in Wumail


Welcome to da Doghouse...right Clem?

Permalink

About auburn

Hi,I am from Beauregard Al(outskirts of Auburn)I dont know much about weather but I enjoy it just the same. I have made lots of great friends on WU! UR3

Local Weather

Clear
81 °F
Clear

auburn's Recent Photos

Recommended Links

Personal Weather Stations

Smiths Station, AL
Elevation: 370 ft
Temperature: 78.9 °F
Dew Point: 66.1 °F
Humidity: 65%
Wind: Calm
Wind Gust: 0.0 mph
Updated: 10:35 AM EDT on August 29, 2014

About Personal Weather Stations