Favorites
You don't appear to have any favorites yet, or your cookies may be disabled.
|
Last Updated: 1:26 AM GMT on July 02, 2009
— Last Comment: 5:22 AM GMT on July 04, 2009
| Posted by: RickyRood, 7:42 PM GMT on July 01, 2009 |
Reliability of the Forest
This is the third in a series of blogs on forests taking up the carbon dioxide that comes from the burning of fossil fuels. I started with a discussion of the pine beetle infestation that is currently killing many trees in the western U.S. and Canada. An important point is that disruptions to forests are often a major source of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. Therefore, whether or not the pine beetle infestation is exacerbated by climate change, the impact of the infestation on climate change is definitive. I give a set of links to primary references below.
The forests and soils of the world store an enormous amount of carbon. In the spring the plants take up carbon dioxide, and in the fall carbon dioxide is released. In the figure shown, the uptake of carbon dioxide is slightly larger than the release of carbon dioxide (1 billion tons of carbon is taken up in the net). This stands in comparison with about 5 billion tons of carbon dioxide released by fossil fuel burning. The transfer of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere into trees and soils by biological processes is an important removal process. Our accounting and management of terrestrial ecosystems is an important part of our strategies to manage carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Carbon Budget in the Earth’s Climate System
Forests are an important part of the carbon management puzzle; however, forests cannot be relied on as the place where we place our excess carbon dioxide. There is a limited ability for forests to take up carbon dioxide, and forests are, often, in direct competition with other uses of land on which forests grow. In particular, deforestation, especially to turn land over to agriculture, is an important source of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. Avoiding deforestation is important way to reduce emissions.
In the first blog of the series I introduced a paper by Dale et al. that discusses the importance of disruptions to forests. Climate Change and Forest Disturbances: Dale et al. 2001 The destruction of trees in western North America by the pine beetle is such a disruption. In the limited geographical region studied by Kurz et al., Nature, 2008, they found the forest changed from taking up 0.59 Megatons of C per year to releasing 17.6 Megaton of C per year. The emissions associated with the pine beetle infestation are comparable, in Canada, to both the forest fire emissions and the emissions from the transportation sector. This demonstrates the slow take up of carbon dioxide by a growing forest in contrast to the rapid release of carbon dioxide if the forest dies quickly. This poses a great challenge to carbon management – many years of carbon accumulation can be released very shortly. Therefore, for the long term, the forests are not a robust place to store excess carbon dioxide. Again, this contributes to my conclusion that we will be compelled to develop technology to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it someplace more permanent.
Over the past few years we have experienced other disruptions to the forest which provide examples of the impact of the disruptions. Chambers et al. in Science in 2007 calculated the amount of carbon dioxide released by forests killed and damaged by hurricane Katrina. They calculated a total biomass loss of 105 Teragrams C from the damaged forests, which is comparable to the net annual uptake of carbon dioxide by forests in the U.S. In this case, we see an entire year’s worth of carbon take up lost to a single disruptive event. Another type of disruption to forests is drought. In a paper published by Peter’s et al. 2007, the uptake by forests in the North America was reduced by about 50% during the extensive 2002 drought.
The disruptions described above all lead to increasing the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. It is true that climate change through the increase of carbon dioxide and the warming of higher latitudes also accelerates growth and, therefore, uptake of carbon dioxide. Nemani et al. calculated that the take up of carbon dioxide has increased by about 6 % between 1982 and 1999, with interestingly, the largest increase in tropical ecosystems. (Some have argued that the increases in, say, Canada and Siberia, should provide a natural buffer to warming, and hence, are more important to managing carbon dioxide.) Kurz et al., Nature, 2008 compare the loss due to pine beetles with this increased use of carbon dioxide by the trees, and again, find that the loss associated with the disruption to the forest is comparable to increased uptake.
From the perspective of climate change it is important to manage the carbon that is stored in trees. We need to keep the carbon that is in the trees, in the trees. However, to imagine that we truly control the amount of carbon dioxide accumulating in the atmosphere with the uptake by trees is naïve. The trees are not, in the long term, a reliable place to store this carbon dioxide. A single disruptive event to a large forest counters many years of carbon uptake. Additionally, there are ecosystem impacts. If it is a goal to limit warming and stabilize the climate, then we need to reduce emissions. We also, however, need to figure out how to remove the carbon dioxide that has already been emitted.
r
Primary References:
Kurz et al., Nature, 2008
Chambers et al. in Science in 2007
Logan and Powell, American Entomologist, 2001
Nemani et al.
Peter’s et al. 2007
Climate Change and Forest Disturbances: Dale et al. 2001 from class readings
Effects of Climate Change on Range of Pine Beetles: Carrol et al. 2003
Pine Beetle Symposium 2003
Previous Pine Beetle Blogs:
Beetles and the Climate
Climate and the Beetles
Previous Blogs on Phenology and Ranges of Trees
Series of Blogs in 2008 of Spring Coming Earlier
Trees Moving North
View Comments (40)
|
Updated: 1:26 AM GMT on July 02, 2009
|
Permalink |
A A A
|
| Posted by: RickyRood, 7:08 PM GMT on June 22, 2009 |
Climate and the Beetle This is the second in a series of blogs on the pine beetle, western forests in the U.S. and Canada, and their relation to climate change. There have been many discussions on the relationship of the pine beetle infestation and climate change. The analysis of the relationship of infestations of this type to climate change is very difficult. I give a set of links to primary references below. Logan and Powell (2001) describe a model that repr...
View Comments (16)
|
Updated: 7:35 PM GMT on June 22, 2009
|
Permalink |
A A A
|
| Posted by: RickyRood, 5:40 PM GMT on June 15, 2009 |
Climate Change and the Forest This week I am at the Community Climate System Model Annual Workshop . It is in Breckenridge, Colorado. In Colorado there has been a lot of discussion in the past few years about the pine beetle or the pine bark beetle. ( Archive Article in Denver Post ). These beetles are attacking lodgepole pines throughout the western United States and Canada. Some have even predicted that all of the lodgepole pine forests could be killed on m...
View Comments (38)
|
Updated: 7:09 PM GMT on June 22, 2009
|
Permalink |
A A A
|
| Posted by: RickyRood, 4:03 PM GMT on June 05, 2009 |
Stabilization of Carbon Dioxide (4) See below more new policy on comments on this blog.This series of blogs (links below) has been exploring the accumulation of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. They have been leading to the conclusion that we cannot afford to let too much carbon dioxide accumulate in the atmosphere. We are fast approaching 400 parts per million (ppm), compared with about 280 ppm before the industrial revolution. Jim Hansen has made cogent argu...
View Comments (73)
|
Updated: 5:05 PM GMT on June 05, 2009
|
Permalink |
A A A
|
| Posted by: RickyRood, 1:48 PM GMT on May 28, 2009 |
Stabilization of Carbon Dioxide (3) See below new policy on comments on this blog.In the previous two blogs I have been talking about the need for stabilization of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Take away messages are that we are committed to warming, that warming will be with us for a long time, and that if we were to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions by 70% or more over the next 100 years, then it would make a difference to the amount of warming that we wou...
View Comments (23)
|
Updated: 4:22 PM GMT on June 04, 2009
|
Permalink |
A A A
|
View Previous Entries
|
 |
I'm a professor at U of Michigan and lead a course on climate change and how it interplays with business, and policy, and ... That's the blog source. |
|
RickyRood's Wunder Photos
|

Copyright © 2009 Weather Underground, Inc.
 |
Copyright © 2009 Weather Underground, Inc.
|
|