Heat Waves (2): Heat and Humans

By: Dr. Ricky Rood , 6:38 PM GMT on August 10, 2008

The long spell of hot days broke in Denver, and my garden is starting to look happier. Still, I want to write one more about heat waves now. (At the bottom, I have a couple of off topic question. One's for teachers, one is for gardeners?)

From a human health point of view, heat waves are often listed as an urban problem. There have been a number of events in the past few years that have brought this message to the forefront. One of the most prominent heat waves was the sustained heat in Europe in 2003, which has been associated with more than 20,000 deaths. (Here is an old USA Today link to the impact in Paris.) The heat wave in Chicago in 1995 motivated much activity in the United States to develop better heat-health warning systems. (Here are a couple of articles from the Bulletin of the American Meteorology Society. Tom Karl and Richard Knight (Chicago Heat Wave) Larry Kalkstein et al. Philadelphia Heat Health Warning System)

In the previous blog the role of environmental , geographical and population information (Figure 1). It would seem to be a simple thing to calculate "when it is hot;" that is, the environmental information.




Figure 1. A schematic of the types of information needed in order to evaluate and respond to environmental heat threats.

Looking at the recent period of prolonged heat in Denver, however, it was not a period of with high human health impact. Perhaps this is because it was well reported, and Denver is an area used to summer heat. Examination of past heat waves give more information.

First, if you look at the Karl and Knight paper referenced above, they use a simple formula for identifying a heat wave. That definition is the nighttime minimum for three days. And, in fact, sustained high nighttime minima are one of the best predictors of human heat health threats. This is an indicator of both the inability of buildings to cool down and people to cool down. In Colorado, where it is dry and often not so cloudy, it continued to cool down at night.

Looking further, a hot spell in April or May in, say, Saint Louis, has a much greater health impact than the same or higher temperatures in August. Hence, there is an element of preparedness, acclimation, or expectation that has a large impact. 95 degrees F in Montreal or Paris is much more dangerous than 95 degrees F in Houston. 95 degrees F in a city where air conditioning is uncommon is more dangerous than where air conditioning is common. Hence the calculation of environmental heat that will be a health threat is far more difficult than calculating the temperature, or even a temperature-humidity combination, like the heat stress index.

(BTW, is you are in an enclosed building, blowing a fan at yourself, a stream of hot air, can make things worse because it dehydrates you faster. Remember that!)

The situation mentioned above is derived primarily from cities, which has been where the greatest public health impact is found. This threat is stongly correlated with chronic day and night high temperatures as well as some measure of "preparedness." There is another type of heat threat which is associated with people who are exercising or who are exposed to extremely high heat. In this case there is a temperature, some place around 105 degrees F, where the mortality rate jumps up. Here is a paper by Sam Keim who works in an emergency room in Arizona.

The human heat health problem indicates the complexity that is realized when trying to address environmental conditions, their impact on health, and how to address those impacts. Next time a little about heat waves and climate change.

Remember my gardening and teaching question below.

r

Some previous heat wave blogs

Hot in Denver: Heat Waves (1)

Letter from India
Heat, Flood, and Fires
Records and Patterns


1) Gardening: I know that some of you are avid gardeners of the organic flavor. I have been trying to find out information about irrigation systems. In particular, have you read anything about PVC pipe and chemicals placed in water or soil?

2) Teaching: I have been contacted by several people who are using my notes to teach climate change across disciplines. Some have expressed interest in starting a "community." If you teach or know of other courses that are teaching problem solving in climate change, let me know. (rbrood@umich.edu)


Reader Comments

Comments will take a few seconds to appear.

Post Your Comments

Please sign in to post comments.

Sign In or Register Sign In or Register

Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.

Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted

Viewing: 39 - 1

Page: 1 — Blog Index

39. M03
5:42 PM GMT on August 28, 2008
A previous comment was made on not understanding someone that doesn't believe in AGW...I'll sum it in two points that I have heard from many people that are average "Joes".
First...There is no PROOF. Both sides of the debate have fancy graphs trying to prove their points, but the sceptics (anti-AGW) have history on their side. That is EVIDENCE. C02 lags behind temp. That is a fact!. That has been proven through history records..Don't believe me?...look it up. Most people already know this.
Second point: Marxist, and Socialist political groups have adopted AGW as their cause for political power and gain at the expense of personal and property rights of the masses. The American people know this and will never except that. To make your AGW cause legit these far left political influences must be seperated from your theory.
If and when proof is found to support AGW..I'll be onboard...At the present time there is none.
37. cyclonebuster
3:48 PM GMT on August 20, 2008
The big question is how do we get rid of all that CO2 Michael? I know one way for sure.
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
35. cyclonebuster
8:19 AM GMT on August 20, 2008
One-Third of U.S. Schools in 'Air Pollution Danger Zone'By Andrea Thompson, Senior Writer

posted: 18 August 2008 03:24 pm ET


As summer vacation ends and children head back to class, they might need a new school supply: face masks.

About one third of American schools are within an air pollution danger zone near major highways and the pollutants that stream from cars and trucks, a new study finds.

Previous research, including the UC Cincinnati Childhood Allergy and Air Pollution Study (CCAAPS), has shown that exposure of school-age children to traffic pollutants near main roads is associated with a greater risk of developing asthma and other respiratory problems later in life.

"This is a major public health concern that should be given serious consideration in future urban development, transportation planning and environmental policies," said study leader Sergey Grinshpun of the University of Cincinnati.

Link
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
34. cyclonebuster
6:41 AM GMT on August 20, 2008
I wonder what that graph would look like if we extrapolated mans supposed effects on climate change on to it??
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
33. redskinsfan22032
12:52 AM GMT on August 20, 2008
Quoting cyclonebuster:
31. redskinsfan22032

"The climate was a lot warmer during the time of the dinosaurs, and the little ice age ended in the middle of the 1800's. Sorry guys, but i believe its a natrual warming trend!"


What little ice age? We have been in an ice age for at least the past 10 million years.


Yes true an ice age period, as there is the greenhouse stage, the snowball earth stage and ice age........but yeah....global warming is in my mind not a man made phenonmena
32. cyclonebuster
12:09 AM GMT on August 20, 2008
31. redskinsfan22032

"The climate was a lot warmer during the time of the dinosaurs, and the little ice age ended in the middle of the 1800's. Sorry guys, but i believe its a natrual warming trend!"


What little ice age? We have been in an ice age for at least the past 10 million years.

Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
31. redskinsfan22032
11:56 PM GMT on August 19, 2008

I personally need to see a lot more proof before I believe what a lot of Liberals keep saying about Global Warming. The climate was a lot warmer during the time of the dinosaurs, and the little ice age ended in the middle of the 1800's. Sorry guys, but i believe its a natrual warming trend!
29. cyclonebuster
3:31 AM GMT on August 19, 2008
Newly Detected Air Pollutant Mimics Damaging Effects Of Cigarette Smoke
ScienceDaily (Aug. 18, 2008) — A previously unrecognized group of air pollutants could have effects remarkably similar to harmful substances found in tobacco smoke, Louisiana scientists are reporting in a study scheduled for presentation today at the 236th National Meeting of the American Chemical Society. Inhaling those pollutants exposes the average person up to 300 times more free radicals daily than from smoking one cigarette, they added.

Link
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
28. cyclonebuster
1:15 AM GMT on August 19, 2008
Gulf 'dead zone' suffocating fish and livelihoodsStory Highlights
Oceanographers say there isn't enough oxygen in the Gulf of Mexico

Water without oxygen means sea life is dying or moving to deeper water

That affects the livelihoods of fishermen who depend on a plentiful catch

Journal: 400 "dead zones" around globe; twice as many as two years ago

Next Article in Technology »



By Allan Chernoff
CNN Senior Correspondent


GULF OF MEXICO (CNN) -- Fisherman Terry Pizani turns his captain's wheel with a mournful expression on his face. Far below, the fishing grounds off the Louisiana coast where the 63-year-old has made a living for five decades have become an aquatic graveyard known as a "dead zone."

"You don't see nothing," he said. "Usually you see bait fish on the water. You don't see no bait fish, nothing. Nothing's there.

"I don't have no kind of testing material to test the water, but I know something's wrong."

Oceanographers who test the Gulf of Mexico waters every month confirm the veteran fisherman is right.

"We're not finding enough oxygen to support life, aquatic life," said scientist Lora Pride aboard the Pelican, the Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium research vessel that studies the Gulf.

CNN traveled aboard the ship August 14-15 as consortium researchers sent sensors to the bottom of the sea, scooped up sediment and collected water samples for analysis at nine testing stations in the Gulf.


Link
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
27. sullivanweather
10:18 PM GMT on August 18, 2008
Apparently the stratospheric flux of sulfur dioxide from the Kasatochi volcano is around 1.5Tg.

I wonder if this will have any effect of some regional/hemispheric cooling of a tenth of a degree or so over the next year. 1.5Tg is only a little under 10% of Pinatubo's SO2 output from its 1991 eruption but it is something to watch for.
Member Since: March 8, 2007 Posts: 273 Comments: 12612
24. sullivanweather
10:06 PM GMT on August 13, 2008


Looks like a pretty large discharge of sulfur dioxide from the August 7, 2008 eruption of Kasatochi volcano. Also note that the eruptive plume rose to 45,000'.

Three major explosive eruptions occured at Kasatochi between approximately 2200 UTC (14:00 AKDT) on 07 August and 0435 UTC on 08 August (20:35 AKDT on 07 August). Ash from these explosions reached at least 45,000 ft above sea level. Ash emissions became continuous following the last explosive event and have produced a continuous ash cloud extending for more than 500 miles in a counterclockwise spiral. Ash from this continuous phase is likely at an altitude in excess of 35,000 ft above sea level. The eruption is ongoing and additional explosive events are possible.

Member Since: March 8, 2007 Posts: 273 Comments: 12612
22. dragonflyF15
5:32 AM GMT on August 12, 2008
I just got back from Alaska and I have to say of my 17 visits up there, this was the coldest wettest summer visit yet (from what my friends say who live there, it's been a whole summer thing, not just me visiting)! But then here in STL I have to say the same, colder and more rain than usual (I believe we are in for another cool front at the end of this week).

As for your PVC question, are you concerned about the PVC material itself or the leaking issue? Sometimes the leakage phenomenon is shown to be a natural occurrence which arises from the adhesion of rubber particles with insufficient binder to fill the voids between particles.

What about using a rain barrel/drip irrigation system? If you are concerned about wasting water and etc a drip irrigation system is ideal. Now, connect that with a rain barrel that collects rainwater from your down spouts and gutters, and you'll have a great water re-use plan.

Harvested rainwater does not contain chlorine, fluoride and other chemicals and is a great choice for watering vegetable and herb gardens.

As for those pots and being away vacationing, try a patio drip irrigation kit. These kits are inexpensive, convenient, and great for vacation watering. You just run the drip microtubing between pots and baskets and then forget about it. You won't come back from holidays to find your mixed hanging basket ready for the compost.

Self watering pots have built in reservoirs that provide consistent low rate water absorption by the plant. Other self watering products such as cones, capillary matting, and water rings are also available for short to long periods of time away.

Another idea to consider is planting a rain garden so that the ground absorbs the run off water that comes through your yard after a storm instead of running down the street to the nearest storm drain.

Planting a rain garden may seem like a small thing, but if you calculate the amount of rain that runs off your roof, you would be very surprised.That rain is supposed to soak into the ground, but instead heads down the street to the storm drain, carrying pollution with it.

Keeping rain where it falls, by putting it into a beautiful rain garden, is a natural solution. You not only get a lovely garden out of it, you have the added benefit of helping protect our rivers, streams and lakes from stormwater pollution.

Now if we can catch that run off water, find a way to filter it and re-use it for watering the landscape....



Member Since: February 13, 2006 Posts: 201 Comments: 2156
20. streamtracker
2:41 AM GMT on August 12, 2008
Not sure what time frame you mean when you say "still won't be warming"
Quoting afcjags03:
RE #2

Looks like Alaska still won't be warming up anytime soon.

But there is this:
Since the 1970s, climate change has doubled the growing season in some places. Since 1950, the overall state temperature has risen by 3.5°F, while wintertime temperatures have risen by 6°F, says Juday, a professor at the University of Alaska-Fairbanks.


Source
Member Since: October 24, 2005 Posts: 12 Comments: 1731
19. streamtracker
2:25 AM GMT on August 12, 2008
#3 afcjags03,

New evidence that AGW does not increase hurricane activity.


As counters points out, you have misinterpreted the results of the paper you link to. Here is the abstract of the paper. Note the concluding sentences.

On Estimates of Historical North Atlantic Tropical Cyclone Activity

Gabriel A. Vecchi and Thomas R. Knutson.
Journal of Climate, Volume 21, Issue 14 (July 2008).

In this study, an estimate of the expected number of Atlantic tropical cyclones (TCs) that were missed by the observing system in the presatellite era (between 1878 and 1965) is developed. The significance of trends in both number and duration since 1878 is assessed and these results are related to estimated changes in sea surface temperature (SST) over the “main development region” (“MDR”). The sensitivity of the estimate of missed TCs to underlying assumptions is examined. According to the base case adjustment used in this study, the annual number of TCs has exhibited multidecadal variability that has strongly covaried with multidecadal variations in MDR SST, as has been noted previously. However, the linear trend in TC counts (1878–2006) is notably smaller than the linear trend in MDR SST, when both time series are normalized to have the same variance in their 5-yr running mean series. Using the base case adjustment for missed TCs leads to an 1878–2006 trend in the number of TCs that is weakly positive, though not statistically significant, with p ∼ 0.2. The estimated trend for 1900–2006 is highly significant (+∼4.2 storms century−1) according to the results of this study. The 1900–2006 trend is strongly influenced by a minimum in 1910–30, perhaps artificially enhancing significance, whereas the 1878–2006 trend depends critically on high values in the late 1800s, where uncertainties are larger than during the 1900s. The trend in average TC duration (1878–2006) is negative and highly significant. Thus, the evidence for a significant increase in Atlantic storm activity over the most recent 125 yr is mixed, even though MDR SST has warmed significantly. The decreasing duration result is unexpected and merits additional exploration; duration statistics are more uncertain than those of storm counts. As TC formation, development, and track depend on a number of environmental factors, of which regional SST is only one, much work remains to be done to clarify the relationship between anthropogenic climate warming, the large-scale tropical environment, and Atlantic TC activity.

I would hardly call the concluding statements either statements as evidence for or against a link between AGW and TC's.

However, we recently saw a paper published in Science that is evidence for a strong link between increased surface temperatures and precipitation.

Atmospheric Warming and the Amplification of Precipitation Extremes
Richard P. Allan and Brian J. Soden
Science Express. August 7, 2008.

Climate models suggest that extreme precipitation events will become more common in an anthropogenically warmed climate. However, observational limitations have hindered a direct evaluation of model projected changes in extreme precipitation. Here, we use satellite observations and model simulations to examine the response of tropical precipitation events to naturally driven changes in surface temperature and atmospheric moisture content. These observations reveal a distinct link between rainfall extremes and temperature, with heavy rain events increasing during warm periods and decreasing during cold periods. Furthermore, the observed amplification of rainfall extremes is found to be larger than predicted by models, implying that projections of future changes in rainfall extremes due to anthropogenic global warming may be underestimated.

By comparing model projections to actual observations they found that models underestimate the positive relationship between temperature and extreme precipitation events.
Member Since: October 24, 2005 Posts: 12 Comments: 1731
18. cyclonebuster
7:43 PM GMT on August 11, 2008
Chinas China is also laiden with radioactive material.
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
17. NRAamy
7:41 PM GMT on August 11, 2008
someone gave me a gift of these lead crystal glasses...I chucked them out....who wants to drink out of lead????
Member Since: January 24, 2007 Posts: 319 Comments: 31956
16. cyclonebuster
7:39 PM GMT on August 11, 2008
Lead is also a very toxic fossil fuel pollutant.
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
15. cyclonebuster
7:36 PM GMT on August 11, 2008
China bans lead paint in toys exported to U.S.
Countries also agree to regular meetings about recall trends



Link
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
14. NRAamy
7:34 PM GMT on August 11, 2008
aw! It's a WeatherNerd Duck!

:)

I avoid "made in China" for those very reasons, cb...

Member Since: January 24, 2007 Posts: 319 Comments: 31956
13. cyclonebuster
7:32 PM GMT on August 11, 2008
Better not play with china toys they are laiden with chemicals that can give us cancer.
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
12. cyclonebuster
7:30 PM GMT on August 11, 2008
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
11. NRAamy
7:26 PM GMT on August 11, 2008
guess I better stick to rubber ducks...
Member Since: January 24, 2007 Posts: 319 Comments: 31956
10. cyclonebuster
7:23 PM GMT on August 11, 2008
9. NRAamy

Hi NRAamy even the ducks are dead ducks with the fossil fuel emissions.


Scientists Analyze Duck Eggs After Alarming Mercury Find in Great Salt Lake, Utah
Friday, August 08, 2008

E-Mail Print Share:

GREAT SALT LAKE, Utah — The Great Salt Lake is so briny that swimmers bob in the water like corks. It is teeming with tiny shrimp that were sold for years in the back of comic books as magical "sea monkeys." And, for reasons scientists cannot explain, it is heavily laden with toxic mercury.

Exactly where the poison is coming from — and how much danger it poses to the millions of migratory birds that feed on the Great Salt Lake — are now under investigation.

"We've got a problem, but we don't know how big it is," said Chris Cline, a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biologist who has been collecting the eggs of cinnamon teal ducks from nests along the rim of the lake so that they can be cracked open and analyzed in the lab.

Three years ago, in an alarming finding, U.S. Geological Survey tests showed the lake had some of the highest mercury readings ever recorded in a body of water in the United States. The state warned people not to eat certain kinds of ducks because of the mercury.

This summer, scientists are fanning out across the lake and its marshy shoreline for the start of what is expected to be a multiyear study. The Environmental Protection Agency and the state are footing most of the $280,000 bill for the initial phase.

Link
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
9. NRAamy
7:17 PM GMT on August 11, 2008
hey cb!

:)
Member Since: January 24, 2007 Posts: 319 Comments: 31956
8. cyclonebuster
7:12 PM GMT on August 11, 2008
3rd highest ace ever on record.

Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
7. counters
7:10 PM GMT on August 11, 2008
My bad, the last quip wasn't directed at you. It was moreso directed at the inevitable retort we'll see from skeptics the blogosphere-over about how this "disproves AGW." Such is life, though.
Member Since: February 4, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 166
6. afcjags03
5:52 PM GMT on August 11, 2008
Wasn't ringing any bells, thus the use of the term, "new evidence."
Member Since: August 16, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 147
5. counters
5:25 PM GMT on August 11, 2008
Quoting afcjags03:
Link

New evidence that AGW does not increase hurricane activity. From Journal of Climate


Not really. This paper was a statistical analysis of the significance of trends in correlation to a single variable, that of MDR SST's. It did not explicitly refute the hypothesis that there has been an increase in the amount of hurricanes; it extrapolated that any trend was influenced in particular by two periods of time (the late 1800's and 1910-1930) such that tweaking the start and end dates of the trend analysis gave divergent results. Furthermore, it noted that there was still a very high level of uncertainty in storm records for these time periods, which makes it especially difficult to determine the significance of the apparent trends we're seeing.

The effect of AGW on hurricane activity and strength is an active area of research which regular yields new, intriguing results. This is why prominent researchers such as Dr. Kerry Emmanuel of MIT seem to "waffle" on the issue; as soon as they commit to one point of view, something new is unearthed which turns things upside down.

It's much too early to ring victory anthems on either side of the debate.
Member Since: February 4, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 166
4. afcjags03
5:10 PM GMT on August 11, 2008
RE #2

Looks like Alaska still won't be warming up anytime soon.
Member Since: August 16, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 147
3. afcjags03
5:08 PM GMT on August 11, 2008
Link

New evidence that AGW does not increase hurricane activity. From Journal of Climate
Member Since: August 16, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 147
2. sullivanweather
1:33 PM GMT on August 11, 2008
Another volcanic eruption in Alaska...




Three major explosive eruptions occured at Kasatochi between approximately 2200 UTC (14:00 AKDT) on 07 August and 0435 UTC on 08 August (20:35 AKDT on 07 August). Ash from these explosions reached at least 45,000 ft above sea level. Ash emissions became continuous following the last explosive event and have produced a continuous ash cloud extending for more than 500 miles in a counterclockwise spiral. Ash from this continuous phase is likely at an altitude in excess of 35,000 ft above sea level. The eruption is ongoing and additional explosive events are possible.


Kasatochi Island and the general area around the island are within a hazard zone and should be avoided. Significant ash fall, pyroclastic flows and surges, and ballistic fallout may occur without warning. If the eruption intensifies and large pyroclastic flows and surges are generated, these may travel over water for tens of miles. It is also possible for these flows to initiate waves if they interact dynamically with the sea
Member Since: March 8, 2007 Posts: 273 Comments: 12612
1. sullivanweather
7:01 AM GMT on August 11, 2008
Ricky,

I've read that PVC pipe does leach some volitile compounds, notably organotins.

Since you are installing this in a place where it could get very cold you should use polyethylene (black roll) piping. It has a bit more elasticity helping it to stand up better to cold weather (especially since it can get really cold out there w/o protective snow cover on occasion), although it is slightly more difficult to install. I also have read that polyethylene can leach, but not as much as PVC.
Member Since: March 8, 2007 Posts: 273 Comments: 12612

Viewing: 39 - 1

Page: 1 — Blog Index

Top of Page

Dr. Ricky Rood's Climate Change Blog

About RickyRood

I'm a professor at U Michigan and lead a course on climate change problem solving. These articles often come from and contribute to the course.

Local Weather

Scattered Clouds
17 °C
Scattered Clouds

RickyRood's Recent Photos

Clouds in the lee of the Rockies at sunset.
Clouds in the lee of the Rockies at sunset.
Clouds in the lee of the Rockies at sunset.
Clouds in the lee of the Rockies at sunset.
×