Hot in Denver: Heat Waves (1)

By: Dr. Ricky Rood , 10:54 PM GMT on August 03, 2008

In the summer I live in Boulder, Colorado and this summer has been hot and dry. In fact in both Denver and Boulder the record for number of days above 90 degrees F has been broken. This is a sustained heat wave, not a heat wave where daily records fall one right after another.

Heat waves that impact human health are generally listed as the environmental condition which causes the most deaths annually. From a human health point of view, they are primarily an urban problem. From the point of view of the climate scientist, heat waves are expected to increase in intensity, frequency and duration. That is, it will be hotter, more often, and the heat will last longer.

Examination of the problem of heat waves is useful for understanding how climate change fits in. Human health is currently impact by excess environmental heat. Therefore a warming climate is likely to amplify the risk, but the fact that there is heat related health impacts is NOT a consequence of climate change. Heat waves, like many other impacts, represent a class of problem that already exists that is likely to be amplified by climate change.

Also like many other problems if your job was to reduce the deaths associated with excess environmental heat, then your motivation to reduce carbon dioxide emissions would be very low. Any impact on heat waves from reducing CO2 emissions would be realized far in the future. The most effective ways to lessen the health threats associated with heat waves are improved heat-health warning systems, better communication of threat conditions and proper responses to affected communities, and provision of a way to stay cool. Therefore, if your job was to reduce the deaths associates with heat waves, you would concentrate your efforts on developing the societal capabilities to warn, taking action, and protecting vulnerable communities.

Figure 1 provides a schematic for thinking about how to improve our abilities to address heat related health threats. There are three basic types of information. The first type is environmental information that informs that there is the likelihood that heat-related health threats are present. The second type of information is geographical information. An important ingredient of determining where heat is a threat is the built environment, city or country, park or parking lot? Knowing the characteristics of the built environment is important, as is a way to determine, for instance, just how hot it might it be in a particular neighborhood. Then once it is known how hot it is, then the health impact is strongly related to knowing if the population is vulnerable. This is often related to wealth and education. Do people have air conditioners or a way to get to a cooling center? Do people see themselves as vulnerable? Do people get the information that dangerous heat is likely? Are people acclimated to high heat?




Figure 1. A schematic of the types of information needed in order to evaluate and respond to environmental heat threats.


From the perspective of someone concerned about climate change and heat waves, then you anticipate how climate change will impact the margins. Will heat health warnings be needed at more northern cities? Will they need to be initiated earlier in the year? Will more facilities be needed to cool people? Strategies to build resilience follow from urban planning, for instance, the use of parks, and policy such as use of roofing materials to moderate urban warming. These strategies are all called for in the absence of climate change; climate change is an additional increment.

r

Some previous heat wave blogs

Letter from India
Heat, Flood, and Fires
Records and Patterns


Reader Comments

Comments will take a few seconds to appear.

Post Your Comments

Please sign in to post comments.

Sign In or Register Sign In or Register

Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.

Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted

Viewing: 72 - 22

Page: 1 | 2Blog Index

72. Dr. Ricky Rood , Professor
4:12 PM GMT on August 10, 2008
Hi,

I was just looking at some of the comments. I've been away a while. WU changed their page. I dropped my laptop.

Are you saying that things did not all move successfully?
Member Since: January 31, 2007 Posts: 355 Comments: 344
71. streamtracker
2:30 PM GMT on August 10, 2008
#61 Mike,

This projection is the latest from the NSIDC

Member Since: October 24, 2005 Posts: 12 Comments: 1731
70. sullivanweather
1:37 AM GMT on August 10, 2008
Quoting MichaelSTL:
Actually, that is because you bumped up an older entry (not sure how that happened, if you click on Ricky's handle it shows this as the current blog



Well, whadduya know...lol

Oops..
Member Since: March 8, 2007 Posts: 273 Comments: 12612
68. sullivanweather
1:12 AM GMT on August 10, 2008
What's also weird is that some 200 comments just disappeared from this blog...
Member Since: March 8, 2007 Posts: 273 Comments: 12612
67. sullivanweather
1:11 AM GMT on August 10, 2008
I always try to bump the current blog when a post is made in an older entry when I see them.

WU should put in place a system that a site such as real climate has where the blog owner can close the comments section to any new comments while leaving the comments up to be viewed, which doesn't happen when one doesn't allow comments in a blog here. All comments end up hidden.
Member Since: March 8, 2007 Posts: 273 Comments: 12612
65. MisterPerfect
1:17 PM GMT on August 08, 2008
Is The End Near?

Report Confirms Large Hadron Collider Will Not Spawn Doomsday Scenario, End World As We Know It

A new report from CERN allegedly puts the final nail in the coffin of doomsday theorists claiming the Large Hadron Collider will result in a reality-ending black hole on Earth. In a word, the report calls the project "safe," and reiterates CERN's original argument that even the most powerful collisions planned for the LHC are nothing compared to what nature has done already for billions of years. "The universe as a whole conducts more than 10 million million LHC-like experiments per second. The possibility of any dangerous consequences contradicts what astronomers see -stars and galaxies still exist," said a layperson's summary of the report.

Conspiracy theorists will no doubt keep on keeping on about the LHC, regardless of the report, but for the more level-headed amongst us, there's a certain finality to CERN's findings. Not end-of-the-world finality, mind you, just peace of mind. The countdown timer says 16 days until activation. (Aug 24, 2008)





Link
Member Since: November 1, 2006 Posts: 72 Comments: 20205
64. cyclonebuster
2:55 AM GMT on August 08, 2008
See anything wrong with this map?

Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
63. cyclonebuster
1:48 AM GMT on August 08, 2008
They almost have it hey Ricky?

Exploration Of Hybrid Offshore Wind-Hydrokinetic Power Projects

Hydro Green Energy's hydrokinetic power turbine array.
by Staff Writers
Houston TX (SPX) Aug 07, 2008
Hydro Green Energy and the Wind Energy Systems Technology Group (W.E.S.T.) have agreed to explore the potential to develop the world's first hybrid offshore wind-hydrokinetic ocean current power projects. If fully developed as envisioned, Hydro Green Energy and W.E.S.T. will utilize the Gulf of Mexico's wind and water currents to generate nearly 5,000 megawatts of clean, renewable electricity.

Link
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
62. cyclonebuster
12:53 AM GMT on August 08, 2008
Michael you are correct that can happen especially if SSTs are still warming up.
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
60. cyclonebuster
12:03 AM GMT on August 08, 2008
If you notice it is mostly right over the Kurishro current.

Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
59. cyclonebuster
11:58 PM GMT on August 07, 2008
Climate Change: When It Rains It Really Pours
ScienceDaily (Aug. 8, 2008) — Climate models have long predicted that global warming will increase the intensity of extreme precipitation events. A new study conducted at the University of Miami and the University of Reading (U.K.) provides the first observational evidence to confirm the link between a warmer climate and more powerful rainstorms.
One of the most serious challenges humanity will face in response to global warming is adapting to changes in extreme weather events. Of utmost concern is that heavy rainstorms will become more common and more intense in a warmer climate due to the increased moisture available for condensation. More intense rain events increase the risk of flooding and can have substantial societal and economic impacts.

To understand how precipitation responds to a warmer climate, researchers in this study used naturally-driven changes associated with El Niño as a laboratory for testing their hypotheses. Based on 20 years of satellite observations, they found a distinct link between tropical rainfall extremes and temperature, with heavy rain events increasing during warm periods and decreasing during cold periods.

"A warmer atmosphere contains larger amounts of moisture which boosts the intensity of heavy downpours," said Dr. Brian J. Soden, associate professor at the University of Miami Rosenstiel School of Marine & Atmospheric Science.

Link
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
58. robodave
11:48 PM GMT on August 07, 2008
The loss in 2007 looks greater by what I can tell Micheal. Not sure how you're coming to the conclusion that this year could compete with 2007. I looked at your graph and what you wrote, but in 2007 the "rapid ice melt" was already ahead and the loss was atleast on the same order. The loss would have to be spectacular to compete. I'm trying to look at this from a laymens perspective.
Member Since: August 9, 2007 Posts: 1 Comments: 147
57. cyclonebuster
10:26 PM GMT on August 07, 2008
I would say so Michael. In order for all that polar ice to melt one would think the North Atlantic and North Pacific would have to warm also.
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
54. cyclonebuster
10:02 PM GMT on August 07, 2008
"The polar ice cap is now so thin that, even though this summer has been somewhat cooler than the previous one, large portions will disappear. "It really almost doesn't matter any more. We know we'll get a big loss of ice this year simply because we have so much thin ice," Dr. Serreze said.

Scientists are still unclear how the disappearance of the Arctic ice will influence weather elsewhere in the world. Some studies show that the western part of North America will suffer extended drought. Others suggest there will be changes to storm tracks and precipitation patterns over Western Europe.

"It's the sort of thing that we're just starting to get a handle on. It's a new area of research because we weren't thinking we would lose sea ice this quickly. Compared to what our climate models said, we're 20, 30 years ahead of schedule in terms of ice loss. This kind of caught us by surprise and the researchers are just starting to catch up.""
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
52. cyclonebuster
8:07 PM GMT on August 07, 2008
I would like to see the ACE for this chart year to date wouldn't you? Especially with the 2005 year we had on it.

Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
51. afcjags03
6:37 PM GMT on August 07, 2008
Again, you are basicly just giving your opinion and showing me nothing.

Don't you think someone over at RC would have at the very least got some one, like a statistician, to look at his work since he has been on them? Even in the one instance caused Hansen to come out publicly and fix an error in his methodology?

Doing his work in the open isn't enough? That's pretty clear and transparent to me, it's all out there for ANYONE to see. So please explain how that exactly isn't enough?

All one has to do is go check out his site to verify his work. Not sure how much more open you can get.

Even streamtracker has went over there to debate and often he just answers questions with questions of his own, never really answering anything in the process.

Again, still would like to see some examples of this hot air. He won the the award in 2007 for best science blog, as did Real Climate in 2005. So does real climate blow nothing but hot air in that sense?
Member Since: August 16, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 147
50. counters
5:33 PM GMT on August 07, 2008
Steve McIntyre caters to the skeptic crowd. It's admirable that he shows the methodology behind his work and publishes his code, but he clearly plays to a crowd which is at the very least hostile to the AGW conclusion.

Doing his work in the open isn't enough. Seeing as very few people who comment on his blog ever question his methods or audit his work (ironic, since they pride themselves on merely "auditing" the AGW evidence), I find it amusing that he is hailed by skeptics and doubters. The bottomline is that unless he's getting other statisticians to weigh in on his methods and conclusions, then his thought experiments are nothing more than that.
Member Since: February 4, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 166
49. afcjags03
4:30 PM GMT on August 07, 2008
I think your wrong and your opinion is a little biased. McIntyre is not a climate scientist and also publishes his work and coding efforts unlike many at RC. So i'm not sure what has to be peer reviewed when he puts it all out there as it is, maybe you can show me some examples because that is the first I ahve heard of it. He also is not a skeptic of AGW as much as some would lead you to believe, he merely is auditing people's work, and doing quite a fine job of it.
Member Since: August 16, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 147
48. counters
3:35 PM GMT on August 07, 2008
Quoting afcjags03:
An interesting read. Link


Not really. For all his hemming and hawing, McIntyre still refuses to publish his analyses. He has a loyal following of "auditors," but in reality, his auditing is meaningless because he refuses to subject his work through the peer review process. Furthermore, he incessantly tries to find controversy where there is none. It's no surprise that the people at RealClimate and elsewhere consider him nothing more than a bunch of hot air.
Member Since: February 4, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 166
47. afcjags03
3:18 PM GMT on August 07, 2008
An interesting read. Link
Member Since: August 16, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 147
46. afcjags03
2:54 PM GMT on August 07, 2008
The arctic has been facing some strong southerly winds over the past week or so. Looks like that will be clearing out shortly though.
Member Since: August 16, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 147
45. counters
2:11 PM GMT on August 07, 2008
Interesting short-term trend emerging at the northern ice cap:



I doubt this period of anomalously rapid melt will amount to something which could top last year's minimum, but it is definitely something to keep an eye on. If the unlikely situation occurs in which we set a new record minimum, it will be hilarious watching "skeptical" blogs react after their complete snarkiness when it came to light earlier in the summers that previous predictions for ice melt were too high.
Member Since: February 4, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 166
44. cyclonebuster
5:04 AM GMT on August 07, 2008
I guess they don't have to worry about hypothermia anymore this time of the year up there.
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
43. cyclonebuster
5:01 AM GMT on August 07, 2008
Conditions at 44017 as of
(11:50 pm EDT on 08/06/2008)
0350 GMT on 08/07/2008: Unit of Measure: English Metric Time Zone: Station Local Time Greenwich Mean Time [GMT] British Summer Time [GMT+1] Eastern Greenland [GMT-1] Azores [GMT-2] Western Greenland [GMT-3] Atlantic Standard [GMT-4] US/Eastern Standard US/Central Standard US/Mountain Standard US/Pacific Standard Alaska Standard [GMT-9] Hawaii-Aleutian Standard [GMT-10] Samoa Standard [GMT-11] International Date Line West [GMT-12] Western European [GMT+0] Central European [GMT+1] Eastern European [GMT+2] Moscow [GMT+3] USSR Zone 3 [GMT+4] USSR Zone 4 [GMT+5] USSR Zone 5 [GMT+6] USSR Zone 6 [GMT+7] China Coast [GMT+8] Japan Standard [GMT+9] Guam Standard [GMT+10] GMT+11 International Date Line East [GMT+12]
Click on the graph icon in the table below to see a time series plot of the last five days of that observation.

Wind Speed (WSPD): 9.7 kts
Wind Gust (GST): 11.7 kts
Wave Height (WVHT): 3.0 ft
Dominant Wave Period (DPD): 6 sec
Average Period (APD): 4.3 sec
Mean Wave Direction (MWD): S ( 180 deg true )
Atmospheric Pressure (PRES): 29.78 in
Pressure Tendency (PTDY): +0.03 in ( Rising )
Air Temperature (ATMP): 68.4 °F
Water Temperature (WTMP): 76.8 °F
Dew Point (DEWP): 66.4 °F
Combined plot of Wind Speed, Gust, and Air Pressure

76.8 OFF OF LONG ISLAND
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
39. cyclonebuster
4:50 AM GMT on August 07, 2008
HOLY CRAP 80 DEGREE WATER UP PAST BOSTON?
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
38. cyclonebuster
4:44 AM GMT on August 07, 2008
Michael check out Randys blog out. Look at the missions he is flying this year monitoring SSTs at various depths. That is very interesting.
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
37. cyclonebuster
4:32 AM GMT on August 07, 2008
I don't know Michael it still looks at least 2C warmer to me. Perhaps, even 3C warmer.
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
35. cyclonebuster
4:18 AM GMT on August 07, 2008
Not according to this it is much warmer over in the Pacific.

Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
33. cyclonebuster
4:01 AM GMT on August 07, 2008

Looks like a very active year for us. I would hate to see the Pacific Oceans ACE this year as it is about 5 degrees warmer than the Atlantic Ocean.


Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
32. cyclonebuster
1:18 AM GMT on August 07, 2008
Acidification Of Sea Hampers Reproduction Of Marine Species
ScienceDaily (Aug. 6, 2008) By absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and from the human use of fossil fuels, the world seas function as a giant buffer for the Earth life support system. The chemical balance of the sea has long been regarded as immovable.
Today, researchers know that the pH of the sea surface water has gone down by 0.1, or 25 percent, just since the beginning of industrialisation just over a century ago. Jon Havenhand and Michael Thorndyke, researchers at the University of Gothenburg, along with colleagues in Australia, have studied how this acidification process affects marine animal


Link
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
31. eoswald
12:10 AM GMT on August 07, 2008
Quoting MichaelSTL:
Quoting eoswald:
hot but no heat wave! over night temperatures at your local dipping down to high 60's/low 70's! too much overnight heat-stress relief for concern!


What about the 80 dewpoint/120 heat index? Have always heard that it is the humidity (also posted to see if anybody knew if dew points were supposed to rise as well as temperatures, thus making heat waves even worse than just a temperature rise alone; haven't seen anything about this).



My bad, ....i do hear what you're saying...and i feel for you, as it seems to be getting extermely hot there. Although, my point earlier was shown best at your location, the PWS showed that on the 3rd at 4 in the morning........at which point it was 69 degrees with a heat index of 64. that is called "heat stress relief" and is not present during heat waves, by my definition.
30. robodave
11:45 PM GMT on August 06, 2008
I hope we're right about AGW because it looks like it'll shutdown the government:
Gingrich: GOP ready to shut government down over drilling

How much money is this going to cost? I sure hope the scientists are right about AGW. I've heard the arguments that since AGW could have disasterous consequences, then it can't hurt to try because we have nothing to lose. Wrong. If we're not correct about AGW, it'll have massive economic impacts and people do die as a result of such things. You can kill people financially.

Can anyone find a link about what is bothering them so much. How much will we gain by drilling where they want to drill? What do we lose, if we drill.
Member Since: August 9, 2007 Posts: 1 Comments: 147
28. counters
3:46 PM GMT on August 06, 2008
Quoting MisterPerfect:
merely that we attempt to prevent it from warming to a level which could have dangerous related effects on the climate.

Seeing as we haven't been able to control anything the planet throws at us, I'd like to find out exactly how that's possible, merely.



Anthropogenic greenhouse gases upset the balance of the radiation processes which occur within the atmosphere. By amplifying the concentration of those greenhouse gases, the balance is upset in such a way that the average temperature of the atmospheric system increases. An appropriate analogy is a thermostat; raise the GHG concentrations, temperature goes up - lower the GHG concentrations, and temperature might respond in the opposite. Of course, it's a lot more complicated than that...

This presumption that man cannot control nature is just a strawman. Nature is not some immovable, all powerful force. Small things can have big consequences. For instance, man-made urban areas will have different temperature and precipitation patterns than their surrounding rural areas; that is a perfect example of man "controlling" nature, although the better term would be man "modifying" nature.
Member Since: February 4, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 166
27. MisterPerfect
3:12 PM GMT on August 06, 2008
merely that we attempt to prevent it from warming to a level which could have dangerous related effects on the climate.

Seeing as we haven't been able to control anything the planet throws at us, I'd like to find out exactly how that's possible, merely.

Member Since: November 1, 2006 Posts: 72 Comments: 20205
26. counters
2:48 PM GMT on August 06, 2008
Let's be very clear about one thing: no one is suggesting that we undergo processes to reduce the global temperature - merely that we attempt to prevent it from warming to a level which could have dangerous related effects on the climate.
Member Since: February 4, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 166
25. Macmcf
5:53 AM GMT on August 06, 2008
Quoting MichaelSTL:
Quoting Macmcf:
What about that study a while back that showed that, since far more people die from cold-related causes than from heat-related ones, the health effect of reducing those deaths will far exceed that of increasing heat-related deaths?


Care to post a link to that study? I have always heard that heat is the number 1 weather-related killer...

Sorry that I haven't had a chance to get back to this topic sooner. When I started looking for my dimly remembered reference, I found a great number of studies had all pointed in the same direction. Several of these have been in medical journals, while others have made their way into the popular press. For example, a BBC story on line at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7240463.stm quotes a British Department of Health report as saying that "the risk of a fatal heatwave in the UK within ten years is high, but overall global warming may mean fewer deaths due to temperature," explaining that as the consequence of the much greater number of cold-related deaths which would be prevented. For another, in the December '07 Discover magazine there was a review of a book titled Cool It by Bjorn Lomborg, which contained the following quote:
"How will heat and cold deaths change over the coming century with global warming? Let us for the moment assume—very unrealistically—that we will not adapt at all to the future heat. Still, the biggest cross-European cold/heat study concludes that for an increase of 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit in the average European temperatures, 'our data suggest that any increases in mortality due to increased temperatures would be outweighed by much larger short-term declines in cold-related mortalities.'"
The study that Lomborg is referencing, in turn, is in the British Medical Journal and is titled "Heat related mortality in warm and cold regions of Europe: observational study". It was paid for by an E.U. grant, and is on-line at http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/321/7262/670 . It's not very long, about 5-6 pages, and is worth a read.
Another more recent medical article is on-line in Medscape at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/494582_5 . (Access to the Medscape library requires registration.)
A great number of references can be generated by Googling "global warming reduce deaths from cold", some of which are obviously selling a point of view. However, most of the technical studies that have been done to obtain realistic numbers using means more scientific than the method of rectal extraction seem to come up with approximately these conclusions:
1) There are nearly ten times more cold-related deaths than heat-related deaths.
2) This ratio is invariant with climate; i.e., people in warm climates do a poorer job of protecting themselves from and/or adapting to cold while doing a better job of protecting themselves from and/or adapting to heat than do people in cold climates. People adjust to weather as they expect it to be.
3) Many of the "heat related deaths" seem to represent short-term acceleration of the death processes of people who were already dying. This is based on the fact that death rates typically fall to sub-normal levels following heat spells.
For what it's worth, that's all I can come up with.
Member Since: July 23, 2001 Posts: 0 Comments: 0
24. cyclonebuster
2:49 AM GMT on August 06, 2008
How are we going to remove the heat caused by GHGs?
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
23. cyclonebuster
2:48 AM GMT on August 06, 2008
Anyone with some ideas?
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907
22. cyclonebuster
2:47 AM GMT on August 06, 2008
When we going to hear how we are going to solve this warming problem we have?
Member Since: January 2, 2006 Posts: 136 Comments: 20907

Viewing: 72 - 22

Page: 1 | 2Blog Index

Top of Page

Dr. Ricky Rood's Climate Change Blog

About RickyRood

I'm a professor at U Michigan and lead a course on climate change problem solving. These articles often come from and contribute to the course.

Local Weather

Scattered Clouds
17 °C
Scattered Clouds

RickyRood's Recent Photos

Clouds in the lee of the Rockies at sunset.
Clouds in the lee of the Rockies at sunset.
Clouds in the lee of the Rockies at sunset.
Clouds in the lee of the Rockies at sunset.
×