About RickyRood
I'm a professor at U Michigan and lead a course on climate change problem solving. These articles often come from and contribute to the course.
By: Dr. Ricky Rood , 10:54 PM GMT on August 03, 2008
In the summer I live in Boulder, Colorado and this summer has been hot and dry. In fact in both Denver and Boulder the record for number of days above 90 degrees F has been broken. This is a sustained heat wave, not a heat wave where daily records fall one right after another.
Heat waves that impact human health are generally listed as the environmental condition which causes the most deaths annually. From a human health point of view, they are primarily an urban problem. From the point of view of the climate scientist, heat waves are expected to increase in intensity, frequency and duration. That is, it will be hotter, more often, and the heat will last longer.
Examination of the problem of heat waves is useful for understanding how climate change fits in. Human health is currently impact by excess environmental heat. Therefore a warming climate is likely to amplify the risk, but the fact that there is heat related health impacts is NOT a consequence of climate change. Heat waves, like many other impacts, represent a class of problem that already exists that is likely to be amplified by climate change.
Also like many other problems if your job was to reduce the deaths associated with excess environmental heat, then your motivation to reduce carbon dioxide emissions would be very low. Any impact on heat waves from reducing CO2 emissions would be realized far in the future. The most effective ways to lessen the health threats associated with heat waves are improved heat-health warning systems, better communication of threat conditions and proper responses to affected communities, and provision of a way to stay cool. Therefore, if your job was to reduce the deaths associates with heat waves, you would concentrate your efforts on developing the societal capabilities to warn, taking action, and protecting vulnerable communities.
Figure 1 provides a schematic for thinking about how to improve our abilities to address heat related health threats. There are three basic types of information. The first type is environmental information that informs that there is the likelihood that heat-related health threats are present. The second type of information is geographical information. An important ingredient of determining where heat is a threat is the built environment, city or country, park or parking lot? Knowing the characteristics of the built environment is important, as is a way to determine, for instance, just how hot it might it be in a particular neighborhood. Then once it is known how hot it is, then the health impact is strongly related to knowing if the population is vulnerable. This is often related to wealth and education. Do people have air conditioners or a way to get to a cooling center? Do people see themselves as vulnerable? Do people get the information that dangerous heat is likely? Are people acclimated to high heat?
Figure 1. A schematic of the types of information needed in order to evaluate and respond to environmental heat threats.
From the perspective of someone concerned about climate change and heat waves, then you anticipate how climate change will impact the margins. Will heat health warnings be needed at more northern cities? Will they need to be initiated earlier in the year? Will more facilities be needed to cool people? Strategies to build resilience follow from urban planning, for instance, the use of parks, and policy such as use of roofing materials to moderate urban warming. These strategies are all called for in the absence of climate change; climate change is an additional increment.
r
Some previous heat wave blogs
Letter from India
Heat, Flood, and Fires
Records and Patterns
Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Please sign in to post comments.
Sign In or Register Sign In or Register
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
|
17 °C
Scattered Clouds
|
72. Dr. Ricky Rood , Professor
4:12 PM GMT on August 10, 2008I was just looking at some of the comments. I've been away a while. WU changed their page. I dropped my laptop.
Are you saying that things did not all move successfully?
71. streamtracker
2:30 PM GMT on August 10, 2008This projection is the latest from the NSIDC
70. sullivanweather
1:37 AM GMT on August 10, 2008Well, whadduya know...lol
Oops..
68. sullivanweather
1:12 AM GMT on August 10, 200867. sullivanweather
1:11 AM GMT on August 10, 2008WU should put in place a system that a site such as real climate has where the blog owner can close the comments section to any new comments while leaving the comments up to be viewed, which doesn't happen when one doesn't allow comments in a blog here. All comments end up hidden.
65. MisterPerfect
1:17 PM GMT on August 08, 2008Report Confirms Large Hadron Collider Will Not Spawn Doomsday Scenario, End World As We Know It
A new report from CERN allegedly puts the final nail in the coffin of doomsday theorists claiming the Large Hadron Collider will result in a reality-ending black hole on Earth. In a word, the report calls the project "safe," and reiterates CERN's original argument that even the most powerful collisions planned for the LHC are nothing compared to what nature has done already for billions of years. "The universe as a whole conducts more than 10 million million LHC-like experiments per second. The possibility of any dangerous consequences contradicts what astronomers see -stars and galaxies still exist," said a layperson's summary of the report.
Conspiracy theorists will no doubt keep on keeping on about the LHC, regardless of the report, but for the more level-headed amongst us, there's a certain finality to CERN's findings. Not end-of-the-world finality, mind you, just peace of mind. The countdown timer says 16 days until activation. (Aug 24, 2008)
Link
64. cyclonebuster
2:55 AM GMT on August 08, 200863. cyclonebuster
1:48 AM GMT on August 08, 2008Exploration Of Hybrid Offshore Wind-Hydrokinetic Power Projects
Hydro Green Energy's hydrokinetic power turbine array.
by Staff Writers
Houston TX (SPX) Aug 07, 2008
Hydro Green Energy and the Wind Energy Systems Technology Group (W.E.S.T.) have agreed to explore the potential to develop the world's first hybrid offshore wind-hydrokinetic ocean current power projects. If fully developed as envisioned, Hydro Green Energy and W.E.S.T. will utilize the Gulf of Mexico's wind and water currents to generate nearly 5,000 megawatts of clean, renewable electricity.
Link
62. cyclonebuster
12:53 AM GMT on August 08, 200860. cyclonebuster
12:03 AM GMT on August 08, 200859. cyclonebuster
11:58 PM GMT on August 07, 2008ScienceDaily (Aug. 8, 2008) — Climate models have long predicted that global warming will increase the intensity of extreme precipitation events. A new study conducted at the University of Miami and the University of Reading (U.K.) provides the first observational evidence to confirm the link between a warmer climate and more powerful rainstorms.
One of the most serious challenges humanity will face in response to global warming is adapting to changes in extreme weather events. Of utmost concern is that heavy rainstorms will become more common and more intense in a warmer climate due to the increased moisture available for condensation. More intense rain events increase the risk of flooding and can have substantial societal and economic impacts.
To understand how precipitation responds to a warmer climate, researchers in this study used naturally-driven changes associated with El Niño as a laboratory for testing their hypotheses. Based on 20 years of satellite observations, they found a distinct link between tropical rainfall extremes and temperature, with heavy rain events increasing during warm periods and decreasing during cold periods.
"A warmer atmosphere contains larger amounts of moisture which boosts the intensity of heavy downpours," said Dr. Brian J. Soden, associate professor at the University of Miami Rosenstiel School of Marine & Atmospheric Science.
Link
58. robodave
11:48 PM GMT on August 07, 200857. cyclonebuster
10:26 PM GMT on August 07, 200854. cyclonebuster
10:02 PM GMT on August 07, 2008Scientists are still unclear how the disappearance of the Arctic ice will influence weather elsewhere in the world. Some studies show that the western part of North America will suffer extended drought. Others suggest there will be changes to storm tracks and precipitation patterns over Western Europe.
"It's the sort of thing that we're just starting to get a handle on. It's a new area of research because we weren't thinking we would lose sea ice this quickly. Compared to what our climate models said, we're 20, 30 years ahead of schedule in terms of ice loss. This kind of caught us by surprise and the researchers are just starting to catch up.""
52. cyclonebuster
8:07 PM GMT on August 07, 200851. afcjags03
6:37 PM GMT on August 07, 2008Don't you think someone over at RC would have at the very least got some one, like a statistician, to look at his work since he has been on them? Even in the one instance caused Hansen to come out publicly and fix an error in his methodology?
Doing his work in the open isn't enough? That's pretty clear and transparent to me, it's all out there for ANYONE to see. So please explain how that exactly isn't enough?
All one has to do is go check out his site to verify his work. Not sure how much more open you can get.
Even streamtracker has went over there to debate and often he just answers questions with questions of his own, never really answering anything in the process.
Again, still would like to see some examples of this hot air. He won the the award in 2007 for best science blog, as did Real Climate in 2005. So does real climate blow nothing but hot air in that sense?
50. counters
5:33 PM GMT on August 07, 2008Doing his work in the open isn't enough. Seeing as very few people who comment on his blog ever question his methods or audit his work (ironic, since they pride themselves on merely "auditing" the AGW evidence), I find it amusing that he is hailed by skeptics and doubters. The bottomline is that unless he's getting other statisticians to weigh in on his methods and conclusions, then his thought experiments are nothing more than that.
49. afcjags03
4:30 PM GMT on August 07, 200848. counters
3:35 PM GMT on August 07, 2008Not really. For all his hemming and hawing, McIntyre still refuses to publish his analyses. He has a loyal following of "auditors," but in reality, his auditing is meaningless because he refuses to subject his work through the peer review process. Furthermore, he incessantly tries to find controversy where there is none. It's no surprise that the people at RealClimate and elsewhere consider him nothing more than a bunch of hot air.
47. afcjags03
3:18 PM GMT on August 07, 200846. afcjags03
2:54 PM GMT on August 07, 200845. counters
2:11 PM GMT on August 07, 2008I doubt this period of anomalously rapid melt will amount to something which could top last year's minimum, but it is definitely something to keep an eye on. If the unlikely situation occurs in which we set a new record minimum, it will be hilarious watching "skeptical" blogs react after their complete snarkiness when it came to light earlier in the summers that previous predictions for ice melt were too high.
44. cyclonebuster
5:04 AM GMT on August 07, 200843. cyclonebuster
5:01 AM GMT on August 07, 2008(11:50 pm EDT on 08/06/2008)
0350 GMT on 08/07/2008: Unit of Measure: English Metric Time Zone: Station Local Time Greenwich Mean Time [GMT] British Summer Time [GMT+1] Eastern Greenland [GMT-1] Azores [GMT-2] Western Greenland [GMT-3] Atlantic Standard [GMT-4] US/Eastern Standard US/Central Standard US/Mountain Standard US/Pacific Standard Alaska Standard [GMT-9] Hawaii-Aleutian Standard [GMT-10] Samoa Standard [GMT-11] International Date Line West [GMT-12] Western European [GMT+0] Central European [GMT+1] Eastern European [GMT+2] Moscow [GMT+3] USSR Zone 3 [GMT+4] USSR Zone 4 [GMT+5] USSR Zone 5 [GMT+6] USSR Zone 6 [GMT+7] China Coast [GMT+8] Japan Standard [GMT+9] Guam Standard [GMT+10] GMT+11 International Date Line East [GMT+12]
Click on the graph icon in the table below to see a time series plot of the last five days of that observation.
Wind Speed (WSPD): 9.7 kts
Wind Gust (GST): 11.7 kts
Wave Height (WVHT): 3.0 ft
Dominant Wave Period (DPD): 6 sec
Average Period (APD): 4.3 sec
Mean Wave Direction (MWD): S ( 180 deg true )
Atmospheric Pressure (PRES): 29.78 in
Pressure Tendency (PTDY): +0.03 in ( Rising )
Air Temperature (ATMP): 68.4 °F
Water Temperature (WTMP): 76.8 °F
Dew Point (DEWP): 66.4 °F
Combined plot of Wind Speed, Gust, and Air Pressure
76.8 OFF OF LONG ISLAND
39. cyclonebuster
4:50 AM GMT on August 07, 200838. cyclonebuster
4:44 AM GMT on August 07, 200837. cyclonebuster
4:32 AM GMT on August 07, 200835. cyclonebuster
4:18 AM GMT on August 07, 200833. cyclonebuster
4:01 AM GMT on August 07, 2008Looks like a very active year for us. I would hate to see the Pacific Oceans ACE this year as it is about 5 degrees warmer than the Atlantic Ocean.
32. cyclonebuster
1:18 AM GMT on August 07, 2008ScienceDaily (Aug. 6, 2008) By absorbing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and from the human use of fossil fuels, the world seas function as a giant buffer for the Earth life support system. The chemical balance of the sea has long been regarded as immovable.
Today, researchers know that the pH of the sea surface water has gone down by 0.1, or 25 percent, just since the beginning of industrialisation just over a century ago. Jon Havenhand and Michael Thorndyke, researchers at the University of Gothenburg, along with colleagues in Australia, have studied how this acidification process affects marine animal
Link
31. eoswald
12:10 AM GMT on August 07, 2008My bad, ....i do hear what you're saying...and i feel for you, as it seems to be getting extermely hot there. Although, my point earlier was shown best at your location, the PWS showed that on the 3rd at 4 in the morning........at which point it was 69 degrees with a heat index of 64. that is called "heat stress relief" and is not present during heat waves, by my definition.
30. robodave
11:45 PM GMT on August 06, 2008Gingrich: GOP ready to shut government down over drilling
How much money is this going to cost? I sure hope the scientists are right about AGW. I've heard the arguments that since AGW could have disasterous consequences, then it can't hurt to try because we have nothing to lose. Wrong. If we're not correct about AGW, it'll have massive economic impacts and people do die as a result of such things. You can kill people financially.
Can anyone find a link about what is bothering them so much. How much will we gain by drilling where they want to drill? What do we lose, if we drill.
28. counters
3:46 PM GMT on August 06, 2008Anthropogenic greenhouse gases upset the balance of the radiation processes which occur within the atmosphere. By amplifying the concentration of those greenhouse gases, the balance is upset in such a way that the average temperature of the atmospheric system increases. An appropriate analogy is a thermostat; raise the GHG concentrations, temperature goes up - lower the GHG concentrations, and temperature might respond in the opposite. Of course, it's a lot more complicated than that...
This presumption that man cannot control nature is just a strawman. Nature is not some immovable, all powerful force. Small things can have big consequences. For instance, man-made urban areas will have different temperature and precipitation patterns than their surrounding rural areas; that is a perfect example of man "controlling" nature, although the better term would be man "modifying" nature.
27. MisterPerfect
3:12 PM GMT on August 06, 2008Seeing as we haven't been able to control anything the planet throws at us, I'd like to find out exactly how that's possible, merely.
26. counters
2:48 PM GMT on August 06, 200825. Macmcf
5:53 AM GMT on August 06, 2008Sorry that I haven't had a chance to get back to this topic sooner. When I started looking for my dimly remembered reference, I found a great number of studies had all pointed in the same direction. Several of these have been in medical journals, while others have made their way into the popular press. For example, a BBC story on line at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7240463.stm quotes a British Department of Health report as saying that "the risk of a fatal heatwave in the UK within ten years is high, but overall global warming may mean fewer deaths due to temperature," explaining that as the consequence of the much greater number of cold-related deaths which would be prevented. For another, in the December '07 Discover magazine there was a review of a book titled Cool It by Bjorn Lomborg, which contained the following quote:
"How will heat and cold deaths change over the coming century with global warming? Let us for the moment assume—very unrealistically—that we will not adapt at all to the future heat. Still, the biggest cross-European cold/heat study concludes that for an increase of 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit in the average European temperatures, 'our data suggest that any increases in mortality due to increased temperatures would be outweighed by much larger short-term declines in cold-related mortalities.'"
The study that Lomborg is referencing, in turn, is in the British Medical Journal and is titled "Heat related mortality in warm and cold regions of Europe: observational study". It was paid for by an E.U. grant, and is on-line at http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/321/7262/670 . It's not very long, about 5-6 pages, and is worth a read.
Another more recent medical article is on-line in Medscape at http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/494582_5 . (Access to the Medscape library requires registration.)
A great number of references can be generated by Googling "global warming reduce deaths from cold", some of which are obviously selling a point of view. However, most of the technical studies that have been done to obtain realistic numbers using means more scientific than the method of rectal extraction seem to come up with approximately these conclusions:
1) There are nearly ten times more cold-related deaths than heat-related deaths.
2) This ratio is invariant with climate; i.e., people in warm climates do a poorer job of protecting themselves from and/or adapting to cold while doing a better job of protecting themselves from and/or adapting to heat than do people in cold climates. People adjust to weather as they expect it to be.
3) Many of the "heat related deaths" seem to represent short-term acceleration of the death processes of people who were already dying. This is based on the fact that death rates typically fall to sub-normal levels following heat spells.
For what it's worth, that's all I can come up with.
24. cyclonebuster
2:49 AM GMT on August 06, 200823. cyclonebuster
2:48 AM GMT on August 06, 200822. cyclonebuster
2:47 AM GMT on August 06, 2008