Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog

The global tropical cyclone season of 2010: record inactivity
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 1:14 AM GMT on April 03, 2011 +9
The year 2010 was one of the strangest on record globally for tropical cyclones. Each year, the globe has about 92 tropical cyclones--called hurricanes in the Atlantic and Eastern Pacific, typhoons in the Western Pacific, and tropical cyclones in the Southern Hemisphere. But in 2010, we had just 68 of these storms--the fewest since the dawn of the satellite era in 1970. The previous record slowest year was 1977, when 69 tropical cyclones occurred world-wide. Both the Western Pacific and Eastern Pacific had their quietest seasons on record in 2010, the Atlantic had its 3rd busiest season since record keeping began in 1851, and the Southern Hemisphere had a below average season. As a result, the Atlantic, which ordinarily accounts for just 13% of global cyclone activity, accounted for 28% in 2010--the greatest proportion since accurate tropical cyclone records began in the 1970s. Global Accumulated Cyclone Energy (ACE) for 2010 was the lowest since the late 1970s (ACE is a measure of the total destructive power of a hurricane season, based on the number of days strong winds are observed.)


Figure 1. Visible satellite image of 2010's strongest tropical cyclone: Super Typhoon Megi at 2:25 UTC October 18, 2010. A reconnaissance aircraft measured a central pressure of 885 mb and surface winds of 190 mph in the storm, making Megi the 8th strongest tropical cyclone in world history. Image credit: NASA.

A record quiet 2010 Northwest Pacific Typhoon Season
The Western Pacific set records for fewest number of named storms (fifteen, previous record seventeen in 1998) and typhoons (nine, tied with the previous record of nine in 1998. Note that Tropical Storm Mindulle was upgraded to a typhoon in post-analysis after the season was over.) Reliable records began in the mid-1960s. For just the second year in history, the Atlantic had more named storms and hurricane-strength storms than the Western Pacific. The only other year this occurred was in 2005. Ordinarily, the Western Pacific has double to triple the amount of tropical cyclones of the Atlantic. One other notable feature of the 2010 season was the lack of a land-falling typhoon on the Japanese mainland. This is only the second such occurrence since 1988.

In 2010, there was only one super typhoon--a storm with at least 150 mph winds--in the Western Pacific. However, this storm, Super Typhoon Megi, was a doozy. Megi's sustained winds cranked up to a fearsome 190 mph and its central pressure bottomed out at 885 mb on October 16, making it the 8th most intense tropical cyclone in world history. Fortunately, Megi weakened significantly before hitting the Philippines as a Category 3 typhoon. Megi killed 69 people on Taiwan and in the Philippines and did $700 million in damage, and was the second deadliest and damaging typhoon of 2010. Category 3 Typhoon Fanapi was the deadliest and most damaging typhoon of 2010, doing over $1 billion in damage to Taiwan and China and killing 105.

The record quiet typhoon season in 2010 was due, in part, to the La Niña phenomena. During such events, the formation region for Western Pacific typhoons moves northwestward, closer to China. Thus, storms that form in the Western Pacific spend less time over water before they encounter land, resulting in a lesser chance to become a named storm, and less time to intensify. They also accumulate a lower ACE due to their shorter duration. Since the Western Pacific is responsible for 35% of the world's major tropical cyclones, the global ACE value is strongly tied to year-to-year variations in the El Niño/La Niña cycle.


Figure 2.
Statistics for the global tropical cyclone season of 2010. The two numbers in each box represent the actual number observed in 2010, followed by the averages from the period 1983-2007 (in parentheses). Averages and records were computed using the December 23, 2008 release of NOAA's International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship.

A record quiet 2010 Eastern Pacific Typhoon Season
In the Eastern Pacific, it was also a record-quiet season. On average, the Eastern Pacific has 15 named storms, 8 hurricanes, and 3 intense hurricanes in a season. In 2010, there were 8 named storms, 3 hurricanes, and 2 intense hurricanes. The previous record quietest season since 1966 was the year 1977, when the Eastern Pacific had 8 named storms, 4 hurricanes, and zero intense hurricanes. La Niña was largely responsible for the quiet Eastern Pacific hurricane season, due in part to the cool sea surface temperatures it brought. It is quite remarkable that both the Eastern and Western Pacific ocean basins had record quiet seasons in the same year--there is no historical precedent for such an occurrence.

Climate change and the 2008 global tropical cyclone season
We only have about 30 years of reliable global tropical cyclone data, and tropical cyclones are subject to large natural variations in numbers and intensities. Thus, it will be very difficult at present to prove that climate change is affecting global tropical cyclone activity. (This is less so in the Atlantic, where we have a longer reliable data record to work with.) A common theme of many recent publications on the future of tropical cyclones globally in a warming climate is that the total number of these storms will decrease, but the strongest storms will get stronger. For example, a 2010 review paper published in Nature Geosciences concluded: "greenhouse warming will cause the globally averaged intensity of tropical cyclones to shift towards stronger storms, with intensity increases of 2 - 11% by 2100. Existing modeling studies also consistently project decreases in the globally averaged frequency of tropical cyclones, by 6 - 34%. Balanced against this, higher resolution modeling studies typically project substantial increases in the frequency of the most intense cyclones, and increases of the order of 20% in the precipitation rate within 100 km of the storm centre." Last year, I discussed a paper by Bender et al that concluded that the total number of Atlantic hurricanes is expected to decrease by the end of the century, but there could be an increase of 81% in the number of Category 4 and 5 storms. The net effect of a decrease in total number of hurricanes but an increase in the strongest hurricanes should cause an increase in U.S. hurricane damages of about 30% by the end of the century, the authors computed, assuming that hurricane damages behave as they did during the past century. A new paper just published by Murakami et. al predicts that Western Pacific tropical cyclones may decrease in number by 23% by the end of the century, primarily due to a shift in the formation location and tracks of these storms.

In light of these theoretical results, it is interesting that 2010 saw the lowest number of global tropical cyclones on record, but an average number of very strong Category 4 and 5 storms. Fully 21% of last year's tropical cyclones reached Category 4 or 5 strength, versus just 14% during the period 1983 - 2007. Most notably, in 2010 we had the second strongest tropical cyclone on record in the Arabian Sea (Category 4 Cyclone Phet in June) and the strongest tropical cyclone ever to hit Myanmar/Burma (October's Tropical Cyclone Giri, an upper end Category 4 storm with 155 mph winds.) It is too early to read anything into this year's global tropical cyclone numbers, though--we need many more years of data before making any judgments on how global tropical cyclones might be responding to climate change.


Figure 3. Visible satellite image of Tropical Cyclone Phet on Thursday, June 3, 2010. Record heat over southern Asia in May helped heat up the Arabian Sea to 2°C above normal, and the exceptionally warm SSTs helped fuel Tropical Cyclone Phet into the second strongest tropical cyclone ever recorded in the Arabian Sea. Phet peaked at Category 4 strength with 145 mph winds. Only Category 5 Cyclone Gonu of 2007, which devastated Oman, was a stronger Arabian Sea cyclone. Phet killed 44 people and did $700 million in damage to Oman.


Figure 4. Visible MODIS satellite image of Tropical Cyclone Giri taken at 2:55am EDT October 22, 2010, just prior to landfall in Myanmar/Burma. At the time, Giri was a Category 4 storm with 145 mph winds. Giri killed 157 people and did $359 million in damage. Image credit: NASA.

Jeff Masters
Categories: Hurricane
  Permalink | A A A
Reader Comments
Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted
Viewing: 1801 - 1818

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 — Blog Index

1801. VAbeachhurricanes 6:00 AM GMT on April 07, 2011    
Quoting TomTaylor:
You're missing the point, 3 months of cooling is insignificant.

If we see 30 yrs of cooling, or even 5 years, then I'll hop aboard your ship and say, gee you're right, the earth is cooling.

3 months isn't going to cut it for me though. We've seen numerous temporary cool downs over the past 40 years, but the overall trend is up.


If you'd like to continue discussing climate change, there's a blog for it


What hes trying to say 30 years out of 4.54 billion shouldn't be considered a base scale either.
Its only .0000000066% of the earths existence...
its been hotter many times, and its been colder many times. And it will be again.
Member Since: September 6, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 4801
1802. Patrap 6:02 AM GMT on April 07, 2011    

Energy from the Sun Has Not Increased


Global surface temperature (top, blue) and the Sun's energy received at the top of Earth's atmosphere (red, bottom). Solar energy has been measured by satellites since 1978.


The amount of solar energy received at the top of our atmosphere has followed its natural 11-year cycle of small ups and downs, but with no net increase. Over the same period, global temperature has risen markedly. This indicates that it is extremely unlikely that solar influence has been a significant driver of global temperature change over several decades.
Member Since: July 3, 2005 Posts: 370 Comments: 111329
1803. VAbeachhurricanes 6:05 AM GMT on April 07, 2011    
Quoting Patrap:

Energy from the Sun Has Not Increased


Global surface temperature (top, blue) and the Sun's energy received at the top of Earth's atmosphere (red, bottom). Solar energy has been measured by satellites since 1978.


The amount of solar energy received at the top of our atmosphere has followed its natural 11-year cycle of small ups and downs, but with no net increase. Over the same period, global temperature has risen markedly. This indicates that it is extremely unlikely that solar influence has been a significant driver of global temperature change over several decades.


Didn't realize the average temperature of the earth is around 1 degree Fahrenheit.
Member Since: September 6, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 4801
1804. TomTaylor 6:05 AM GMT on April 07, 2011    
Quoting VAbeachhurricanes:


What hes trying to say 30 years out of 4.54 billion shouldn't be considered a base scale either.
Its only .0000000066% of the earths existence...
its been hotter many times, and its been colder many times. And it will be again.
fine. Would you rather it not be called climate change? Meteorologists agree the climate is the avg weather over a period of 30yrs or more. Yet you and ifyousayso are clearly better qualified than all of them and there many years of study which allowed them to become mets in the first place.

So we won't call it climate change. We'll just say the earth is warming. Are you happier now? Is there any difference?
Member Since: August 24, 2010 Posts: 18 Comments: 3896
1805. VAbeachhurricanes 6:08 AM GMT on April 07, 2011    
Quoting TomTaylor:
fine. Would you rather it not be called climate change? Meteorologists agree the climate is the avg weather over a period of 30yrs or more. Yet you and ifyousayso are clearly better qualified than all of them and there many years of study which allowed them to become mets in the first place.

So we won't call it climate change. We'll just say the earth is warming. Are you happier now? Is there any difference?


haha, I never said I was better qualified just trying to point out what I thought he was trying to say.
Call it want you want, personally i think the name Climate Change is the stupidest name they could come up with, because it is always changing.
Member Since: September 6, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 4801
1806. TampaSpin 6:08 AM GMT on April 07, 2011    





Member Since: September 2, 2007 Posts: 175 Comments: 19747
1807. TomTaylor 6:09 AM GMT on April 07, 2011    
Quoting VAbeachhurricanes:


Didn't realize the average temperature of the earth is around 1 degree Fahrenheit.
Clearly it is explaining the difference in temp over the last century which was over 1 degree Fahrenheit
Member Since: August 24, 2010 Posts: 18 Comments: 3896
1808. TomTaylor 6:10 AM GMT on April 07, 2011    
Quoting VAbeachhurricanes:


haha, I never said I was better qualified just trying to point out what I thought he was trying to say.
Call it want you want, personally i think the name Climate Change is the stupidest name they could come up with, because it is always changing.
hah that's true
Member Since: August 24, 2010 Posts: 18 Comments: 3896
1809. VAbeachhurricanes 6:12 AM GMT on April 07, 2011    
Quoting TomTaylor:
So you're going to ignore the entire post because you cant properly read a graph? Clearly it is explaining the difference in temp over the last century which was over 1 degree Fahrenheit


If they are trying to make a reputable graph I think the least they should do is take the five extra seconds to label the dang thing correctly.
Say what you mean, and mean what you say. Or in this case, show.
Member Since: September 6, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 4801
1810. IFuSAYso 6:14 AM GMT on April 07, 2011    
A final note before I get out of your hair "go to bed" what happened to to the Ozone debate. The US/Europe didn't fix it. Oh crap, as many scientist stated, it fixed it self in its normal cycle. Don't be so arrogant to think you make a difference when it comes to mother nature. You may poison the planet, but you wont change it. We are no more than gnat poop on the wall in an Olympic swimming pool. Just my dumb ass assessment.
Member Since: March 8, 2011 Posts: 0 Comments: 115
1811. TomTaylor 6:14 AM GMT on April 07, 2011    
Quoting VAbeachhurricanes:


If they are trying to make a reputable graph I think the least they should do is take the five extra seconds to label the dang thing correctly.
Say what you mean, and mean what you say. Or in this case, show.
whatever sinks your ship sailor
Member Since: August 24, 2010 Posts: 18 Comments: 3896
1812. VAbeachhurricanes 6:17 AM GMT on April 07, 2011    
Quoting TomTaylor:
whatever sinks your ship sailor


I thought it was float your boat...
Edit: At first when i clicked image info it said Wikipedia. My Apologies.
It's NOAA, which makes the mistake that much uglier.
Member Since: September 6, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 4801
1813. TomTaylor 6:21 AM GMT on April 07, 2011    
Quoting IFuSAYso:
A final note before I get out of your hair "go to bed" what happened to to the Ozone debate. The US/Europe didn't fix it. Oh crap, as many scientist stated, it fixed it self in its normal cycle. Don't be so arrogant to think you make a difference when it comes to mother nature. You may poison the planet, but you wont change it. We are no more than gnat poop on the wall in an Olympic swimming pool. Just my dumb ass assessment.
Everything has an influence. Ever heard of the butterfly effect?

And in case you didn't know, we are a part of mother nature. We are a species on this earth just like all others. We just have extraordinary intelligence relative to the others
Member Since: August 24, 2010 Posts: 18 Comments: 3896
1814. TomTaylor 6:22 AM GMT on April 07, 2011    
Yeah I know it was a play on the float your boat saying
Member Since: August 24, 2010 Posts: 18 Comments: 3896
1815. VAbeachhurricanes 6:22 AM GMT on April 07, 2011    
Quoting TomTaylor:
Yeah I know it was a play on the float your boat saying


haha, I know mine was a joke about how you changed it to sink your ship, as in I'm wrong haha.
Member Since: September 6, 2007 Posts: 0 Comments: 4801
1816. TampaSpin 6:24 AM GMT on April 07, 2011    
goodnnie everyone......take a look at the 2 graphs i just posted....What do you see?
Member Since: September 2, 2007 Posts: 175 Comments: 19747
1817. MrMixon 7:04 AM GMT on April 07, 2011    
Where the heck do people keep hearing this hogwash about the ozone hole "healing itself"? Um, just to set the record straight, ozone depletion over the poles, and particularly over the southern hemisphere continues to this day, despite what some may have heard.

Here's some reading for you, in case you are a fan of facts.

A recent news article.

Another article.

And NASA's page on the status of the ozone hole.

The bottom line is that even though CFC concentrations have dropped, it's expected to take decades (ETA: 2050ish) for the concentrations to drop enough for the hole to be insignificant. If you've heard otherwise, you've been misinformed.
Member Since: March 26, 2006 Posts: 38 Comments: 964
1818. WatchingThisOne 7:28 AM GMT on April 07, 2011    
NEW BLOG
Member Since: July 15, 2005 Posts: 3 Comments: 1249

Viewing: 1801 - 1818

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 — Blog Index

New Comment
Community Standards Policy Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Post Your Comments
Please sign in to post comments.
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
About JeffMasters
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.

Local Weather
Scattered Clouds
81 °F
Scattered Clouds
Community Activity