"These nations comprise 19% of the total land area of Earth. This is the largest area of Earth's surface to experience all-time record high temperatures in any single year in the historical record."


The first statement is correct; the second is at best dubious. Is one national record really comparable to another (e.g. Belarus to Ascension I.)? Is it correct to add areas of whole nations, because of one record in one limited area? Is it really true that as much as 19% of the surface of Earth has experienced all-time record high temperatures?

Russia is the world's largest country. It now has a new national heat record (or even two). So far, so good. Cyprus also hit a new national heat record this year. Now, if you would divide Russia up into pieces as small as Cyprus, you would find that not all of these almost 2000 pieces have set new records. Maybe 10% did, maybe 20% or more did, but certainly not all of them, thus making up the total area of Russia. However, the whole area of Russia is counted in as part of the 19%; in fact Russia makes up more than half of this area.

On the other hand, USA is also a large nation. Possibly, a U.S. national heat record was set in 2007, but not in 2010 (as yet), so USA is not included. I am not aware of any new U.S. state heat records set in 2010, but if, let's say, Delaware and Rhode Island had new state records set in July, USA will still contribute with just 0 km² to the total area, according to the metrics of Dr. Jeff Masters. That seems wrong to me. They are small states, but together they are as large as Cyprus. Also, some U.S. states are much larger than Delaware. Maybe, if you divided up for instance Alaska or Texas into smaller pieces, you would find new local records here and there? Those areas, too, ought to be added to the total land area percentage figure.

However, if the national record from Death Valley is beaten again this year, suddenly all 9,372,614 km² of the U.S. will be added to the total land area that has experienced all-time high. That also seems wrong to me.

In short, to claim that a certain percentage of the total land area of Earth has experienced all-time record high temperatures, you would have to divide the total area into reasonably small parts (probably much smaller than Cyprus but bigger than Ascension Island's 88 km²). Then you would have to investigate the temperature history of each one. Nations are in this respect in most cases too big units (or in a few cases even too small units), to form a valid base for a statement like the one quoted at the top of this comment.
Member Since: August 15, 2010 Posts: 0 Comments: 1