Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog

An African wave worth watching; 2nd warmest June on record
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 1:51 PM GMT on July 17, 2009 +2
There's finally a African tropical wave worth mentioning, in what has been a very inactive June/July period for African waves with a potential to develop. A tropical wave near 12N 36W, about 1200 miles west of the coast of Africa, is triggering some modest heavy thunderstorm activity over the open ocean as the storm moves west at 10 - 15 mph. NHC designated this wave 97 L at noon today. Wind shear is a modest 15 knots over the disturbance, which is low enough to allow some slow development over the next few days. As long as the disturbance stays south of Puerto Rico's latitude (18°N), wind shear should remain low enough to allow development. However, there is a substantial amount of African dust and dry air surrounding the system on its west and north sides. This dry air will retard development, and may be able to completely disrupt the disturbance at some point over the next 3 - 4 days. None of the computer models develop the disturbance. The National Hurricane Center is giving this system a low (less than 30% chance) of developing into a tropical depression in the next 48 hours.


Figure 1. The first African wave of 2009 worth watching.

Second warmest June on record
The globe recorded its second warmest June on record, 0.02°C short of the record set in 2005, according to the National Climatic Data Center. The period January - June was the fifth warmest such period on record. Global temperature records go back to 1880. The most notable warmer-than-average temperatures were recorded across parts of Africa and most of Eurasia, where temperatures were 3°C (5°F) or more above average. The global ocean Sea Surface Temperature (SST) for June 2009 was the warmest on record, 0.59°C (1.06°F) above the 20th century average. This broke the previous June record set in 2005. The record June SSTs were due in part to the development of El Niño conditions in the Eastern Pacific. If El Niño conditions continue to strengthen during the coming months, we will probably set one or more global warmest-month-on-record marks later this year. The last time Earth experienced a second warmest month on record was in October 2008.


Figure 1. Departure of temperature from average for June 2009. Image credit: National Climatic Data Center.

June sea ice extent in the Arctic 4th lowest on record
June 2009 Northern Hemisphere sea ice extent was the 4th lowest since 1979, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center. The record June low was set in 2006. This summer's melt is lagging behind the melting in the summer of 2007, which set the record for the lowest amount of summer sea ice in the Arctic. Forecasts of summer Arctic sea ice melt made in early June by two teams of German scientists put the odds of a new record sea ice minimum this year between 7% and 28%. With the amount of sunlight in the Arctic now on the wane, it appears unlikely that we will set a new record sea ice minimum in 2009. This year will probably have the 2nd or 3rd least sea ice extent on record come September, when the melting season ends. The ice-free seas that nearly surround Greenland now have contributed to temperatures of 2 - 3°C above average over the island over the past ten days. With clear skies and above-average temperatures likely over most of the island for at least the next week, we can expect near-record July melting over portions of the Greenland Ice Sheet this month.

Northwest Passage likely to open for the third consecutive year
The fabled Northwest Passage is more than half clear now, and has a good chance of melting free for the third consecutive year--and third time in recorded history. The first recorded attempt to find and sail the Northwest Passage was in 1497, and ended in failure. The thick ice choking the waterways thwarted all attempts at passage for the next four centuries. Finally, in 1905, Roald Amundsen completed the first successful navigation of the Northwest Passage. It took his ship two-and-a-half years to navigate through narrow passages of open water, and his ship spent two cold, dark winters locked in the ice during the feat.

We can be sure the Northwest Passage was never open from 1900 on, as we have detailed ice edge records from ships (Walsh and Chapman, 2001). It is very unlikely the Passage was open between 1497 and 1900, since this spanned a cold period in the northern latitudes known as "The Little Ice Age". Ships periodically attempted the Passage and were foiled during this time. The Northwest passage may have been open at some period during the Medieval Warm Period, between 1000 and 1300 AD.


Figure 3. Ice extent as measured by an AMSR-E microwave satellite sensor on July 15, 2009. Most of the famed Northwest Passage (red lines) has melted out. Image credit: University of Bremen.

References
Walsh, J.E and W.L.Chapman, 2001, "Twentieth-century sea ice variations from observational data", Annals of Glaciology, 33, Number 1, January 2001 , pp. 444-448.

I'll have an update on the African tropical wave at least once this weekend if the system doesn't fall apart.

Jeff Masters
  Permalink | A A A
Reader Comments
Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted
Viewing: 751 - 801

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43Blog Index

751. Drakoen 7:51 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting BurnedAfterPosting:


yea we do, I think it is hard for some to survive the ebbs and flows that happen with a developing system, regardless of how many storms they have tracked


You haven't been here long enough. You still need to earn your keep.
Member Since: October 28, 2006 Posts: 57 Comments: 29012
753. BurnedAfterPosting 7:52 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting Drakoen:


You haven't been here long enough. You still need to earn your keep.


LOL I have been part of the weather community on other sites long enough to know how it works, I have heard stories about this site as well

Trust me I know how it works
754. CybrTeddy 7:52 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
96L In 2007 had far more Dry Air to contend with. 97L's a totally different story. It has the possibility to develop. Shear models indicate a drastic decrease in shear.
Member Since: July 8, 2005 Posts: 255 Comments: 20633
755. BurnedAfterPosting 7:53 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
WS he is joking around

regardless of what happens with 97L it will eventually die out lol
756. WPBHurricane05 7:54 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting WeatherStudent:


i've copied and pasted taht previously written statement of ours. when these thing begisn to blow-up, i'll give you a reminder of what you thought of it today, ok, soudns fair with you bud? its called playing fire with fire, :) cheers.


I think he means that eventually it will eventually die. All things have a beginning and an end.
Member Since: July 31, 2006 Posts: 56 Comments: 8005
758. CaneWarning 7:55 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting WeatherStudent:


i've copied and pasted taht previously written statement of ours. when these thing begisn to blow-up, i'll give you a reminder of what you thought of it today, ok, soudns fair with you bud? its called playing fire with fire, :) cheers.


No, I mean it will die no matter what. If it develops it will still hit land and be RIP eventually. :)
Member Since: April 26, 2009 Posts: 3 Comments: 3667
759. reedzone 7:55 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting CybrTeddy:
96L In 2007 had far more Dry Air to contend with. 97L's a totally different story. It has the possibility to develop. Shear models indicate a drastic decrease in shear.


Show me a image of 96L, I don't remember it.. It was 2 years ago though..
Member Since: July 1, 2008 Posts: 13 Comments: 7249
760. TheCaneWhisperer 7:56 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting CybrTeddy:
96L In 2007 had far more Dry Air to contend with. 97L's a totally different story. It has the possibility to develop. Shear models indicate a drastic decrease in shear.


All it takes is those highs to bridge. The shear would die out instantaneously.
761. OSUWXGUY 7:57 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting nrtiwlnvragn:


Upgrades to the Global Forecast BR>

No more changes to GFDL, that model is "frozen".


Thanks! Some good solid info here... That's right the HWRF is supposed to become THE model eventually while the GFDL is put out to pasture. I'm sure there's a boatload of research being funded for it.
762. BurnedAfterPosting 7:57 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting TheCaneWhisperer:


All it takes is those highs to bridge. The shear would die out instantaneously.


yup exactly
763. Cotillion 7:57 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
You know with all these undoubted constant updates, we should just set up a Twitter account for 97L...

I bet it'd try for 'AspiringStorm'.

"Bit lonely out here, taking in some fresh water though. You wouldn't BELIEVE how thirsty I am."

"Anyone got an inhaler? Dry air's getting into my rainbands."

"@St0rm1456 LOL! Nah, not going to FL. Scared of 'gators."

(Of course, any storm is very eloquent and takes great care of their grammar.)
Member Since: August 23, 2008 Posts: 7 Comments: 5300
764. Tazmanian 7:57 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
so if this is 97L where did 95L and 96L go???
Member Since: May 21, 2006 Posts: 5089 Comments: 111624
766. smartguy1 8:00 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
one thing that i have noticed while observing these waves is that none has seemed to persist past 40w since coming off the coast, this one seems to be following that trend not saying it is no doubt the structure looks good but the convection has died out at the moment
767. Seflhurricane 8:01 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
tonight will be ntresting to see if we get a blow up of thunderstorms near the circulation in dmax lets see !!!!!!
Member Since: July 14, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 2910
768. StormJunkie 8:01 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Taz the best answer on that so far is...

They were remarkable invest so they retired the numbers
Member Since: August 17, 2005 Posts: 26 Comments: 15240
769. reedzone 8:01 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Shear already decreasing about 5 knots..

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8sht.html
Member Since: July 1, 2008 Posts: 13 Comments: 7249
770. Seflhurricane 8:02 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting smartguy1:
one thing that i have noticed while observing these waves is that none has seemed to persist past 40w since coming off the coast, this one seems to be following that trend not saying it is no doubt the structure looks good but the convection has died out at the moment
we have to wait and see normally they go through phases maybe i will explode tonight or 97L will be long gone ??
Member Since: July 14, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 2910
771. Seflhurricane 8:03 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
for starters this system has almost everything in its favor except the lack of thunderstorms and the dry air nearby.
Member Since: July 14, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 2910
772. willdunc79 8:04 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
I agree that we shoul wait until Dmax and see what thi invest does but I say that the dry air will totally kill off this invest but hey let's wait and see.
Member Since: June 27, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 152
773. StormJunkie 8:04 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting smartguy1:
one thing that i have noticed while observing these waves is that none has seemed to persist past 40w since coming off the coast, this one seems to be following that trend not saying it is no doubt the structure looks good but the convection has died out at the moment


True sg1, but this is the absolute worst time of day for it as well. Will have to see if it rebuilds convection when night falls.
Member Since: August 17, 2005 Posts: 26 Comments: 15240
774. Seflhurricane 8:05 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
anyone know the water temperatures around our invest
Member Since: July 14, 2009 Posts: 0 Comments: 2910
775. cg2916 8:06 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting willdunc79:
I agree that we shoul wait until Dmax and see what thi invest does but I say that the dry air will totally kill off this invest but hey let's wait and see.

What is DMAX?
Member Since: December 21, 2007 Posts: 13 Comments: 2954
776. nrtiwlnvragn 8:06 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting OSUWXGUY:


Thanks! Some good solid info here... That's right the HWRF is supposed to become THE model eventually while the GFDL is put out to pasture. I'm sure there's a boatload of research being funded for it.


GFDN (Navy version of GFDL) will continue to be improved.
Member Since: September 23, 2005 Posts: 12 Comments: 9089
777. smartguy1 8:06 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
yes agreed sh, patience is needed time will tell..
778. Drakoen 8:08 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting WeatherStudent:
drak, on the visable staellite imagery this afternoon, it appears to be establishing three distinctive feeder bands to sustain itself, one to i's east, the other one to it's south, and last one to it's west. thoughts my friend?


Don't start with the 20 questions. I'm not in the mood.
Member Since: October 28, 2006 Posts: 57 Comments: 29012
779. weatherwatcher12 8:11 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
It's an invest? Can someone fill me in, my power just came back.
Member Since: May 16, 2009 Posts: 1 Comments: 1231
780. StormJunkie 8:11 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting Seflhurricane:
anyone know the water temperatures around our invest


Almost 81 degrees at the surface, which is all that really matters with the way this thing is moving.
Member Since: August 17, 2005 Posts: 26 Comments: 15240
781. StormJunkie 8:14 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
No need to answer him then drak...That is if you are not in the mood.

Member Since: August 17, 2005 Posts: 26 Comments: 15240
782. Stormchaser2007 8:15 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
97L?

Member Since: June 9, 2007 Posts: 4 Comments: 15294
783. Drakoen 8:15 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Can't help say it looks pretty anemic right now lol
Member Since: October 28, 2006 Posts: 57 Comments: 29012
784. RMM34667 8:16 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
763. Cotillion 7:57 PM GMT on July 17, 2009

LOL. very well done!
Member Since: September 7, 2006 Posts: 5 Comments: 912
785. smartguy1 8:16 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
sj and as you just pointed out higher sst's lay ahead for the system albeit one to two days away, and they gradually get warmer and warmer, it will be interesting to see if it can maintain itself to take advantage of the warmer waters.
786. cg2916 8:16 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Someone please tell me what DMIN and DMAX are, without using those big giant words, please.
Member Since: December 21, 2007 Posts: 13 Comments: 2954
787. ssmate 8:16 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Drak,

What will happen during DMAX? Will dry air eat this up? will it continue west or recurve? Will shear help or inhibit?, are you liking the HWRF model or not? I'm not freaking out but should I be worried here in FL?
Member Since: July 17, 2008 Posts: 0 Comments: 347
788. CaneWarning 8:16 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Yeah it doesn't have much convection...but that doesn't matter so much right now.
Member Since: April 26, 2009 Posts: 3 Comments: 3667
789. CaneWarning 8:17 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting cg2916:
Someone please tell me what DMIN and DMAX are, without using those big giant words, please.


It's been posted several times.
Member Since: April 26, 2009 Posts: 3 Comments: 3667
790. cchsweatherman 8:17 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
After analyzing Invest 97L, it does seem to have some good low-level structure coming together with clear cyclonic circulation and inflow becoming established from the south and east. In watching water vapor imagery, the disturbance could be drawing in some dry air from the north and west, which combined with diurnal minimum, has lead to a marked decrease in convection. Like many others have stated, it will be very interesting to see what happens during diurnal maximum.

But I do want to say that given the fact that we still don't have a true system out there, its really hard to determine its future. So, for right now, I'm just going to sit back and watch this disturbance.
Member Since: April 14, 2007 Posts: 8 Comments: 4928
791. Tazmanian 8:18 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
guys whats see what 97L dos 1st
Member Since: May 21, 2006 Posts: 5089 Comments: 111624
793. CaneWarning 8:20 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting WeatherStudent:


i'm sorry, i didn't know. i apologies. would anyoen else liek to take a stab at my questiont then?


The answer is yes.
Member Since: April 26, 2009 Posts: 3 Comments: 3667
794. Drakoen 8:20 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting WeatherStudent:


i'm sorry, i didn't know. i apologies. would anyoen else liek to take a stab at my questiont then?


Maybe a lesson on how to spell and type would be in order first.
Member Since: October 28, 2006 Posts: 57 Comments: 29012
795. CaneWarning 8:21 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting Drakoen:


Maybe a lesson on how to spell and type would be in order first.


You should "apologies" for that. Sorry couldn't resist. :)
Member Since: April 26, 2009 Posts: 3 Comments: 3667
796. Tazmanian 8:23 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting Drakoen:


Maybe a lesson on how to spell and type would be in order first.




now that was funny
Member Since: May 21, 2006 Posts: 5089 Comments: 111624
797. Drakoen 8:22 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
Quoting CaneWarning:


You should "apologies" for that. Sorry couldn't resist. :)


I guess a grammar and syntax class wouldn't hurt either.
Member Since: October 28, 2006 Posts: 57 Comments: 29012
799. IKE 8:24 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
It looks about 10 times better then the wave that is around 55W looked when it was at 35-40W.

Member Since: June 9, 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37070
801. Patrap 8:24 PM GMT on July 17, 2009    
LRO Sees Apollo Landing Sites
07.17.09


NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, or LRO, has returned its first imagery of the Apollo moon landing sites. The pictures show the Apollo missions' lunar module descent stages sitting on the moon's surface, as long shadows from a low sun angle make the modules' locations evident.

The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera, or LROC, was able to image five of the six Apollo sites, with the remaining Apollo 12 site expected to be photographed in the coming weeks.

The satellite reached lunar orbit June 23 and captured the Apollo sites between July 11 and 15. Though it had been expected that LRO would be able to resolve the remnants of the Apollo mission, these first images came before the spacecraft reached its final mapping orbit. Future LROC images from these sites will have two to three times greater resolution.
Member Since: July 3, 2005 Posts: 377 Comments: 112972

Viewing: 751 - 801

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43Blog Index

New Comment
Community Standards Policy Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Post Your Comments
Please sign in to post comments.
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
About JeffMasters
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.

Community Activity