Dr. Jeff Masters' WunderBlog

U.S. vulnerability to sea level rise
Posted by: Dr. Jeff Masters, 4:04 PM GMT on June 23, 2009 +2
In the last century, sea level rose 5 - 6 inches (13 - 15 cm) more than the global average of 7 inches (18 cm) along the U.S. Mid-Atlantic and Gulf Coasts, because coastal lands there are sinking. Over 50% of the U.S. coastline is vulnerable or highly vulnerable to sea level rise, according to the Coastal Vulnerability Index (CVI) developed by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). In the U.S., relative sea level rise (the combined effects of global sea level rise plus the fact the land is sinking) is highest along the Mississippi River Delta in Louisiana, where relative sea level rises of 3.2 ft (.98 meters) have been observed during the 20th century. This is one of the highest relative sea level rises in the world. According to the NOAA Tides and Currents sea level rise interactive tool, the U.S. tide gauges that have shown the highest rates of sea level rise over the past century are at Grand Island, LA (1.8 ft rise since 1947), Galveston, TX (1.1 ft since 1957), and Chesapeake Bay, VA (0.6 feet since 1975). Alaska and some areas along the Pacific Northwest coast are at low risk of sea level rise, because the relative sea level is actually falling at present. Land in these regions is rising as it recovers from removal of the weight of the great ice sheets that covered much of North America during the last Ice Age. For example, relative sea level at Kodiak Island, Alaska has fallen by 1.1 feet since 1975, despite the fact global sea level has been increasing.


Figure 1. Twentieth century annual relative sea-level rise rates in mm/year along the U.S. coast. The higher rates for Louisiana (9.85 millimeters [mm] per year, about 3.3 ft/century) and the mid-Atlantic region (1.75 to 4.42 mm per year, 0.6 - 1.4 ft/century) are due to land subsidence. Sea level is stable or dropping relative to the land in the Pacific Northwest, as indicated by the negative values, where the land is tectonically active or rebounding upward in response to the melting of ice sheets since the last Ice Age. Image credit: Coastal Sensitivity to Sea-Level Rise: A Focus on the Mid-Atlantic Region (data from Zervas, 2001).

U.S. Coastal Vulnerability
The Coastal Vulnerability Index (CVI) takes into account six factors:

1) The geology of the coast. Barrier islands, river deltas, and marshes are the most vulnerable to erosion and sea level rise, while steep, rocky cliff shores are the least. Sheltered bays like Galveston Bay and Tampa Bay are less vulnerable than the exposed coasts. (Note, however, that hurricane storm surges are typically higher in sheltered bays, at least for slow-moving storms).

2) How steep the land near the coast is. Gently sloping lands are the most vulnerable. In the Gulf Coast region, the slope variable has the highest risk ranking along the Louisiana coast, the Texas coast north of Corpus Christi, and the southwest Florida coast.

3) The local rate of sea level rise. The sea level is rising faster along the western Gulf of Mexico than the eastern Gulf. The highest rates of sea-level rise in the Gulf of Mexico (and in the United States) are in the Mississippi delta region (10 mm/yr, or 1 inch/2.5 years).

4) The amount of shoreline erosion going on. Most of the U.S. coast is moderately or severely eroding, and very few areas are gaining (Figure 2).

5) The mean tidal range. Shores that have a large difference between low and high tide are less likely to get a significant storm tide--the height above mean sea level of the sum of the storm surge plus the tide. For example, in a region like Maine, which has a 12 ft range between low and high tide, a storm having a 9 ft storm surge will have a storm tide below local high tide for a quarter of a tidal cycle. Shores with a very narrow tidal range (e.g., the 2 ft tidal range common along the Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coast) will get a storm tide of 8 - 10 feet with the 9 ft storm surge in the above example. Shorelines with a narrow tidal range always get high storm tides regardless of when the storm surge hits.

6) How high the waves at shore are. Obviously, shores that experience higher wave heights are at greater risk. In the Gulf of Mexico, wave energy is highest along sections of the Texas coast and on the southern tip of the Mississippi delta.

Figure 2. Shoreline change around the United States based on surveys over the past century. All 30 coastal states are experiencing overall erosion due to natural processes (e.g., storms, sea-level rise) and human activity. If the shoreline is uncolored, no data was available. Image credit: USGS, 1985, and taken from Coastal Sensitivity to Sea-Level Rise: A Focus on the Mid-Atlantic Region).

The Coastal Vulnerability Index (CVI) web page gives detailed maps of each section of the U.S. coast, along with specific reasons why each portion of the coast was assigned the ranking it got. A brief summary:

The Gulf Coast
The Gulf Coast has 55% of its length in the "very high" or "high" vulnerability range. Fully 41% of the coast falls in the "very high" range, far more than the 28% in that category along the Pacific coast and 23% along the Atlantic coast. The region around New Orleans is the most vulnerable region of the entire U.S. coast. The Florida Panhandle, as well as the West Florida coast, are at low to moderate risk because the land is not sinking much, wave heights are lower, and the slope of the land is relatively steep near the coast. The Texas coast is considered to be at a high to very high risk because of the relatively high mean wave height, sinking land, and shallow coastal slope.

The East Coast
The East Coast has 50% of its length in the "very high" or "high" vulnerability range. The highest vulnerability areas are typically high-energy coastlines where the regional coastal slope is low and where the major landform type is a barrier island. A significant exception to this is found in the lower Chesapeake Bay. Here, the low coastal slope, vulnerable landform type (salt marsh) and high rate of relative sea-level rise combine for a high CVI value. The coastline of northern New England, particularly Maine, shows a relatively low vulnerability to future sea-level rise. This is primarily due to the steep coastal slopes and rocky shoreline characteristic of the region, as well as the large tidal range.

The Pacific Coast
The Pacific Coast has 50% of its length in the "very high" or "high" vulnerability range. Areas of very high vulnerability include the San Francisco - Monterey Bay coast and in southern California from San Luis Obispo to San Diego, where the coast is most highly populated. The highest vulnerability areas are typically lower-lying beach areas. The low risk, least vulnerable areas generally occur at rocky headlands along cliffed coasts where the coastal slope is steep, relative sea-level is falling, tide range is large, and wave energy is lower. Examples of these areas are the northern coast of Washington, Monterey, and Cape Mendocino, California.


Figure 3. The Coast Vulnerability Index (CVI) for the U.S.

References
Coastal Sensitivity to Sea-Level Rise: A Focus on the Mid-Atlantic Region.

National Assessment of Coastal Vulnerability to Sea-Level Rise: Preliminary Results for the U.S. Gulf of Mexico Coast (USGS, 2000).

Jeff Masters
  Permalink | A A A
Reader Comments
Display: 0, 50, 100, 200 Sort: Newest First - Order Posted
Viewing: 1351 - 1377

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 — Blog Index

1353. IKE 3:16 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
Quoting DestinJeff:


... cue the "going to pull a Dolly" posts

btw... Ana Montana, Ike? Really? have you no shame?


LOL.
Member Since: June 9, 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37044
1354. kmanislander 3:17 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
Quoting DestinJeff:


little bit closer to home than the "pre-CV system" (somebody will call it that)... i'll keep my eyes on the carrib for now, despite the universal disdain for the NAM


The 12Z NAM has a 1004 mb low near the Yucatan on Saturday. For that to materialise things would have to get going quickly near Nicaragua.
Member Since: August 19, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 14939
1355. OSUWXGUY 3:18 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
Quoting kmanislander:


I do indeed. We won't have long to wait to see how it plays out. The NAM has been developing a 1004 mb low in the NW Caribbean late this weekend for several runs now.


Hey Kman! Agreed...something else to keep an eye on...especially with ALL models showing low shear in that area.
1356. Ossqss 3:20 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
TCHP is very ripe in that area Kman. The site is too slow to post it, at least from this PC.
Member Since: June 12, 2005 Posts: 6 Comments: 8154
1357. BahaHurican 3:21 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
Quoting hurricane2009:


Its only happened twice 1907 and 1914
Well, it's getting to be that time of century again. . . lol
-----------------
Hey, Aussie. How cool has it gotten?
Member Since: October 25, 2005 Posts: 19 Comments: 17588
1358. weathersp 3:22 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
Quoting DestinJeff:


... cue the "going to pull a Dolly" posts

btw... Ana Montana, Ike? Really? have you no shame?


Is there way I can click "like this comment" more than once? LOL
Member Since: January 14, 2007 Posts: 17 Comments: 4112
1359. BahaHurican 3:23 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
Quoting DestinJeff:


little bit closer to home than the "pre-CV system" (somebody will call it that)... i'll keep my eyes on the carrib for now, despite the universal disdain for the NAM
Even if not a truly tropical entity, it could be a rainmaker for the area.
Member Since: October 25, 2005 Posts: 19 Comments: 17588
1360. weathersp 3:25 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
Member Since: January 14, 2007 Posts: 17 Comments: 4112
1361. BahaHurican 3:25 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
Later, all. Gotta head 2 wk.. . .:o(
Member Since: October 25, 2005 Posts: 19 Comments: 17588
1362. AussieStorm 3:26 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
Quoting BahaHurican:
Well, it's getting to be that time of century again. . . lol
-----------------
Hey, Aussie. How cool has it gotten?

well it was 5C here this morning and it got to a balmy 15C today. but at least the sun was out. Currently its a whole 9C and its ment to get down to 5C again tonight. Glad i got my electric blanket.
Member Since: September 30, 2007 Posts: 5 Comments: 13272
1363. futuremet 3:28 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
Member Since: July 19, 2008 Posts: 43 Comments: 4049
1364. Ossqss 3:29 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
Quoting weathersp:


Can you grab the 26 depth, I cannot get connected, big brother stepped on it.
Member Since: June 12, 2005 Posts: 6 Comments: 8154
1365. weathersp 3:30 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
Quoting Ossqss:


Can you grab the 26 depth, I cannot get connected, big brother stepped on it.

Member Since: January 14, 2007 Posts: 17 Comments: 4112
1366. stoormfury 3:40 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
broad area of low pressure in the GOMEX. within this area are a number of mid level votices spinning around. convection has been on the increase as the system appers to be drifting to the southwest. shear is only marginal, but is expected to be very favouable the next 72 hrs. there are no evidence to suggest that the the mid levl vortices are working down to the surface. before that happens the convection has to coalesce to one area of heavy convection. this area should be quite interesting the next few days
Member Since: August 22, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 2302
1367. IKE 3:42 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
12Z GFS at 36 hours....

Member Since: June 9, 2005 Posts: 23 Comments: 37044
1368. RitaEvac 3:43 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
Member Since: July 14, 2008 Posts: 1 Comments: 8874
1369. CybrTeddy 3:43 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
Area of Interest 1: MLC with gaining convection in Caribbean.

Area of Interest 2: Strong Cape Verde wave.
Member Since: July 8, 2005 Posts: 253 Comments: 20201
1370. Patrap 3:44 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
Member Since: July 3, 2005 Posts: 370 Comments: 111244
1371. weathersp 3:49 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
Quoting Patrap:
GOM 84 Hour Wind Forecast Model


Good Link..Thanks Pat! saving that one..
Member Since: January 14, 2007 Posts: 17 Comments: 4112
1372. kmanislander 3:49 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
Back later
Member Since: August 19, 2006 Posts: 0 Comments: 14939
1373. OSUWXGUY 3:50 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
GFS is definitely persistent with the African Wave. Has a tropical system develop by 48 hours... 12UTC Saturday morning. Let's see how this actually plays out!


1374. RitaEvac 3:50 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
10AM CDT already 94 in Houston
Member Since: July 14, 2008 Posts: 1 Comments: 8874
1375. weathersp 3:51 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
Off topic majorly..

have any of you all tried Chips that thave been in the freezer for an hour on a hot day?

You all should try..
Member Since: January 14, 2007 Posts: 17 Comments: 4112
1376. Ossqss 3:52 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
New Blog !
Member Since: June 12, 2005 Posts: 6 Comments: 8154
1377. KEEPEROFTHEGATE (Mod) 4:11 PM GMT on June 25, 2009    
and the tunder rolls
Member Since: July 15, 2006 Posts: 143 Comments: 40398

Viewing: 1351 - 1377

Page: 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 — Blog Index

New Comment
Community Standards Policy Comments will take a few seconds to appear.
Post Your Comments
Please sign in to post comments.
Not only will you be able to leave comments on this blog, but you'll also have the ability to upload and share your photos in our Wunder Photos section.
About JeffMasters
Jeff co-founded the Weather Underground in 1995 while working on his Ph.D. He flew with the NOAA Hurricane Hunters from 1986-1990.

Community Activity